如果你真的只想从Set中选择“任意”对象，而不保证随机性，最简单的方法是使用迭代器返回的第一个对象。

    Set<Integer> s = ...
    Iterator<Integer> it = s.iterator();
    if(it.hasNext()){
        Integer i = it.next();
        // i is a "random" object from set
    }

int size = myHashSet.size();
int item = new Random().nextInt(size); // In real life, the Random object should be rather more shared than this
int i = 0;
for(Object obj : myhashSet)
{
    if (i == item)
        return obj;
    i++;
}

这比接受答案中的for-each循环要快:

int index = rand.nextInt(set.size());
Iterator<Object> iter = set.iterator();
for (int i = 0; i < index; i++) {
    iter.next();
}
return iter.next();

for-each构造在每次循环时调用Iterator.hasNext()，但由于index < set.size()，该检查是不必要的开销。我看到速度提高了10-20%，但是YMMV。(而且，编译时不需要添加额外的return语句。)

请注意，这段代码(以及大多数其他答案)可以应用于任何集合，而不仅仅是集合。通用方法形式:

public static <E> E choice(Collection<? extends E> coll, Random rand) {
    if (coll.size() == 0) {
        return null; // or throw IAE, if you prefer
    }

    int index = rand.nextInt(coll.size());
    if (coll instanceof List) { // optimization
        return ((List<? extends E>) coll).get(index);
    } else {
        Iterator<? extends E> iter = coll.iterator();
        for (int i = 0; i < index; i++) {
            iter.next();
        }
        return iter.next();
    }
}

c++。这应该是相当快的，因为它不需要遍历整个集合，也不需要对它排序。这应该适用于大多数现代编译器，假设它们支持tr1。如果没有，您可能需要使用Boost。

Boost文档有助于解释这一点，即使你不使用Boost。

诀窍在于利用数据已被划分为多个bucket的事实，并快速识别随机选择的bucket(具有适当的概率)。

//#include <boost/unordered_set.hpp>  
//using namespace boost;
#include <tr1/unordered_set>
using namespace std::tr1;
#include <iostream>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <assert.h>
using namespace std;

int main() {
  unordered_set<int> u;
  u.max_load_factor(40);
  for (int i=0; i<40; i++) {
    u.insert(i);
    cout << ' ' << i;
  }
  cout << endl;
  cout << "Number of buckets: " << u.bucket_count() << endl;

  for(size_t b=0; b<u.bucket_count(); b++)
    cout << "Bucket " << b << " has " << u.bucket_size(b) << " elements. " << endl;

  for(size_t i=0; i<20; i++) {
    size_t x = rand() % u.size();
    cout << "we'll quickly get the " << x << "th item in the unordered set. ";
    size_t b;
    for(b=0; b<u.bucket_count(); b++) {
      if(x < u.bucket_size(b)) {
        break;
      } else
        x -= u.bucket_size(b);
    }
    cout << "it'll be in the " << b << "th bucket at offset " << x << ". ";
    unordered_set<int>::const_local_iterator l = u.begin(b);
    while(x>0) {
      l++;
      assert(l!=u.end(b));
      x--;
    }
    cout << "random item is " << *l << ". ";
    cout << endl;
  }
}

不如就

public static <A> A getRandomElement(Collection<A> c, Random r) {
  return new ArrayList<A>(c).get(r.nextInt(c.size()));
}

Clojure的解决方案:

(defn pick-random [set] (let [sq (seq set)] (nth sq (rand-int (count sq)))))