I use to do not specify action attribute at all. It is actually how my framework is designed all pages get submitted back exact to same address. But today I discovered problem. Sometimes I borrow action attribute value to make some background call (I guess some people name them AJAX). So I found that IE keeps action attribute value as empty if action attribute wasn't specified. It is a bit odd in my understanding, since if no action attribute specified, the JavaScript counterpart has to be at least undefined. Anyway, my point is before you choose best practice you need to understand more context, like will you use the attribute in JavaScript or not.

只使用

?

<form action="?" method="post" enctype="multipart/form-data" name="myForm" id="myForm">

它并不违反HTML5标准。

I use to do not specify action attribute at all. It is actually how my framework is designed all pages get submitted back exact to same address. But today I discovered problem. Sometimes I borrow action attribute value to make some background call (I guess some people name them AJAX). So I found that IE keeps action attribute value as empty if action attribute wasn't specified. It is a bit odd in my understanding, since if no action attribute specified, the JavaScript counterpart has to be at least undefined. Anyway, my point is before you choose best practice you need to understand more context, like will you use the attribute in JavaScript or not.

当你放空动作时，一些安全过滤认为它是恶意的或网络钓鱼。因此，他们可以阻止你的页面。所以建议不要让action=为空。

我认为最好明确地说明表单的位置。如果你想要完全安全，如果你想要表单提交回自身，在action属性中输入相同的URL。尽管主流浏览器会将""赋值到同一页面，但不能保证非主流浏览器也会这样做。

当然，整个URL包括GET数据，就像Juddling指出的那样。

实际上，当前HTML5草案的Form Submission分段不允许action=""。这是违反规格的。

action和formaction内容属性(如果指定)必须具有一个有效的非空URL值，该值可能被空格包围。(重点)

墨卡托的回答中引用的部分是对实现的要求，而不是对作者的要求。作者必须遵循作者要求。如何阅读本规范:

特别是，有一些一致性要求适用于生产者，例如作者和他们创建的文档，还有一些一致性要求适用于消费者，例如Web浏览器。它们可以通过它们的需求来区分:对生产者的需求说明了允许什么，而对消费者的需求说明了软件如何操作。

html4允许一个空的url，而html4的改变是因为“浏览器对一个空的action=”“属性”做了一些奇怪的事情。考虑到更改的原因，最好也不要在HTML4中这样做。