func removeDublicate (ab: [Int]) -> [Int] {
var answer1:[Int] = []
for i in ab {
    if !answer1.contains(i) {
        answer1.append(i)
    }}
return answer1
}

用法:

let f = removeDublicate(ab: [1,2,2])
print(f)

斯威夫特4. x:

extension Sequence where Iterator.Element: Hashable {
  func unique() -> [Iterator.Element] {
    return Array(Set<Iterator.Element>(self))
  }

  func uniqueOrdered() -> [Iterator.Element] {
    return reduce([Iterator.Element]()) { $0.contains($1) ? $0 : $0 + [$1] }
  }
}

用法:

["Ljubljana", "London", "Los Angeles", "Ljubljana"].unique()

or

["Ljubljana", "London", "Los Angeles", "Ljubljana"].uniqueOrdered()

斯威夫特5.7

使用有序集

您可以将具有重复元素的数组传递给以下通用函数，该函数处理有序Set并返回没有重复元素的新数组。

import Foundation

internal func withoutDuplicates<T>(_ array: [T]) -> [T] {
    
    let orderedSet: NSMutableOrderedSet = []
    var modifiedArray = [T]()
    
    orderedSet.addObjects(from: array)
    
    for i in 0...(orderedSet.count - 1) {
        modifiedArray.append(orderedSet[i] as! T)
    }
    return modifiedArray
}

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

let arrayOfStrings: [String] = ["A","A","A","B","B","C","C"]
let arrayOfIntegers: [UInt8] = [1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3]
let arrayOfBooleans: [Bool] = [true, false, false, true]

let ordered_01 = withoutDuplicates(arrayOfStrings)
let ordered_02 = withoutDuplicates(arrayOfIntegers)
let ordered_03 = withoutDuplicates(arrayOfBooleans)

结果:

// ordered_01  –––>  ["A","B","C"]
// ordered_02  –––>  [1, 2, 3]
// ordered_03  –––>  [true, false]

使用无序集

如果新数组中元素的顺序对您来说并不重要，则在处理时使用无序集。无序集中的元素类型必须符合哈希协议。

import UIKit

fileprivate func noDuplicates<T: Hashable>(_ array: [T]) -> [T] {
    
    var unorderedSet = Set<T>()
    var modifiedArray: [T] = []
    
    for i in 0...(array.count - 1) {
        unorderedSet.insert(array[i])
    }
    for i in unorderedSet.indices {
        modifiedArray.append(unorderedSet[i])
    }
    return modifiedArray
}

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

let arrayOfInts: [Int] = [10, 5, 7, 200, -500, 10, 7, 5]
let arrayOfStrs: [String] = ["A","A","A","B","B","C","C"]
let arrayOfBools: [Bool] = [true, false, false, true]

let unordered_01 = noDuplicates(arrayOfInts)
let unordered_02 = noDuplicates(arrayOfStrs)
let unordered_03 = noDuplicates(arrayOfBools)

结果:

// unordered_01  –––>  [200, 7, 10, -500, 5]
// unordered_02  –––>  ["B", "C", "A"]
// unordered_03  –––>  [false, true]

像函数式程序员一样思考:)

要根据元素是否已经出现来筛选列表，需要索引。可以使用enumeration获取索引，并使用map返回值列表。

let unique = myArray
    .enumerated()
    .filter{ myArray.firstIndex(of: $0.1) == $0.0 }
    .map{ $0.1 }

这保证了秩序。如果你不介意顺序，那么Array(Set(myArray))的现有答案更简单，可能更有效。

更新:一些关于效率和正确性的注意事项

一些人对效率进行了评论。我肯定是先写正确而简单的代码，然后再找出瓶颈，尽管我知道这是否比Array(Set(Array))更清楚是有争议的。

这个方法比Array(Set(Array))慢很多。正如评论中所指出的，它确实保持了顺序，并对非Hashable的元素起作用。

然而，@Alain T的方法也保持了秩序，也快得多。所以除非你的元素类型是不可哈希的，或者你只是需要一个快速的一行，那么我建议采用他们的解决方案。

以下是MacBook Pro(2014)在Xcode 11.3.1 (Swift 5.1)发布模式下的一些测试。

profiler函数和两个比较方法:

func printTimeElapsed(title:String, operation:()->()) {
    var totalTime = 0.0
    for _ in (0..<1000) {
        let startTime = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent()
        operation()
        let timeElapsed = CFAbsoluteTimeGetCurrent() - startTime
        totalTime += timeElapsed
    }
    let meanTime = totalTime / 1000
    print("Mean time for \(title): \(meanTime) s")
}

func method1<T: Hashable>(_ array: Array<T>) -> Array<T> {
    return Array(Set(array))
}

func method2<T: Equatable>(_ array: Array<T>) -> Array<T>{
    return array
    .enumerated()
    .filter{ array.firstIndex(of: $0.1) == $0.0 }
    .map{ $0.1 }
}

// Alain T.'s answer (adapted)
func method3<T: Hashable>(_ array: Array<T>) -> Array<T> {
    var uniqueKeys = Set<T>()
    return array.filter{uniqueKeys.insert($0).inserted}
}

以及少量的测试输入:

func randomString(_ length: Int) -> String {
  let letters = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ0123456789"
  return String((0..<length).map{ _ in letters.randomElement()! })
}

let shortIntList = (0..<100).map{_ in Int.random(in: 0..<100) }
let longIntList = (0..<10000).map{_ in Int.random(in: 0..<10000) }
let longIntListManyRepetitions = (0..<10000).map{_ in Int.random(in: 0..<100) }
let longStringList = (0..<10000).map{_ in randomString(1000)}
let longMegaStringList = (0..<10000).map{_ in randomString(10000)}

给出输出:

Mean time for method1 on shortIntList: 2.7358531951904296e-06 s
Mean time for method2 on shortIntList: 4.910230636596679e-06 s
Mean time for method3 on shortIntList: 6.417632102966309e-06 s
Mean time for method1 on longIntList: 0.0002518167495727539 s
Mean time for method2 on longIntList: 0.021718120217323302 s
Mean time for method3 on longIntList: 0.0005312927961349487 s
Mean time for method1 on longIntListManyRepetitions: 0.00014377200603485108 s
Mean time for method2 on longIntListManyRepetitions: 0.0007293639183044434 s
Mean time for method3 on longIntListManyRepetitions: 0.0001843773126602173 s
Mean time for method1 on longStringList: 0.007168249964714051 s
Mean time for method2 on longStringList: 0.9114790915250778 s
Mean time for method3 on longStringList: 0.015888616919517515 s
Mean time for method1 on longMegaStringList: 0.0525397013425827 s
Mean time for method2 on longMegaStringList: 1.111266262292862 s
Mean time for method3 on longMegaStringList: 0.11214958941936493 s

包含相等性检查，而插入检查哈希，最安全的检查方式如下:

extension Array where Element: Hashable {

    /// Big O(N) version. Updated since @Adrian's comment. 
    var uniques: Array {
        // Go front to back, add element to buffer if it isn't a repeat.
         var buffer: [Element] = []
         var dictionary: [Element: Int] = [:]
         for element in self where dictionary[element] == nil {
             buffer.append(element)
             dictionary[element] = 1
         }
         return buffer
    }
}

如果你想保持秩序，那么就用这个

let fruits = ["apple", "pear", "pear", "banana", "apple"] 
let orderedNoDuplicates = Array(NSOrderedSet(array: fruits).map({ $0 as! String }))