ViewBag vs MVC中的ViewData

http://royalarun.blogspot.in/2013/08/viewbag-viewdata-tempdata-and-view.html

ViewBag和ViewData的相似之处:

当您从控制器移动到视图时，有助于维护数据。用于 将数据从控制器传递到相应的视图。短寿命意味着 值在重定向发生时变为空。这是因为他们的目标 是提供一种在控制器和视图之间通信的方法。这是 服务器调用中的通信机制。

ViewBag和ViewData的区别:

ViewData是派生自的对象字典 viewdatdictionary类，并使用字符串作为键访问。ViewBag 动态属性是否利用了新的动态特性 在c# 4.0。ViewData需要对复杂的数据类型进行类型转换 检查空值以避免错误。ViewBag不需要 复杂数据类型的类型转换。

ViewBag & ViewData示例:

public ActionResult Index()
{   
    ViewBag.Name = "Arun Prakash";   
    return View();
}

public ActionResult Index()
{  
    ViewData["Name"] = "Arun Prakash";  
    return View();
}   

视图呼叫

@ViewBag.Name    
@ViewData["Name"]

public ActionResult Index()
{
    ViewBag.Name = "Monjurul Habib";
    return View();
}

public ActionResult Index()
{
    ViewData["Name"] = "Monjurul Habib";
    return View();
} 

In View:

@ViewBag.Name 
@ViewData["Name"] 

在ViewBag内部，属性以名称/值对的形式存储在ViewData字典中。

注意:在MVC 3的大多数预发布版本中，ViewBag属性被命名为ViewModel，这段代码来自MVC 3发布说明:

有人建议我发布我发布的这个信息的来源，下面是来源: http://www.asp.net/whitepapers/mvc3-release-notes#_Toc2_4

MVC 2 controllers support a ViewData property that enables you to pass data to a view template using a late-bound dictionary API. In MVC 3, you can also use somewhat simpler syntax with the ViewBag property to accomplish the same purpose. For example, instead of writing ViewData["Message"]="text", you can write ViewBag.Message="text". You do not need to define any strongly-typed classes to use the ViewBag property. Because it is a dynamic property, you can instead just get or set properties and it will resolve them dynamically at run time. Internally, ViewBag properties are stored as name/value pairs in the ViewData dictionary. (Note: in most pre-release versions of MVC 3, the ViewBag property was named the ViewModel property.)

ViewData:它需要对复杂的数据类型进行类型转换，并检查空值以避免错误。

ViewBag:对于复杂的数据类型，它不需要类型强制转换。

考虑下面的例子:

public class HomeController : Controller
{
    public ActionResult Index()
    {
        var emp = new Employee
        {
            EmpID=101,
            Name = "Deepak",
            Salary = 35000,
            Address = "Delhi"
        };

        ViewData["emp"] = emp;
        ViewBag.Employee = emp;

        return View(); 
    }
}

View的代码如下:

@model MyProject.Models.EmpModel;
@{ 
 Layout = "~/Views/Shared/_Layout.cshtml"; 
 ViewBag.Title = "Welcome to Home Page";
 var viewDataEmployee = ViewData["emp"] as Employee; //need type casting
}

<h2>Welcome to Home Page</h2>
This Year Best Employee is!
<h4>@ViewBag.Employee.Name</h4>
<h3>@viewDataEmployee.Name</h3>

Although you might not have a technical advantage to choosing one format over the other, you should be aware of some important differences between the two syntaxes. One obvious difference is that ViewBag works only when the key you’re accessing is a valid C# identifi er. For example, if you place a value in ViewData["Key With Spaces"], you can’t access that value using ViewBag because the code won’t compile. Another key issue to consider is that you cannot pass in dynamic values as parameters to extension methods. The C# compiler must know the real type of every parameter at compile time in order to choose the correct extension method. If any parameter is dynamic, compilation will fail. For example, this code will always fail: @Html.TextBox("name", ViewBag.Name). To work around this, either use ViewData["Name"] or cast the va

有一些细微的区别，这意味着你可以使用ViewData和ViewBag与视图略有不同的方式。这篇文章http://weblogs.asp.net/hajan/archive/2010/12/11/viewbag-dynamic-in-asp-net-mvc-3-rc-2.aspx中概述了一个优点，并展示了在示例中可以通过使用ViewBag而不是ViewData来避免强制转换。