所有的答案都表明ViewBag和/或ViewData是将数据从控制器传递到视图，这是错误的信息。两者都非常有用，可以将数据从视图传递到布局或局部视图(或ViewComponents等)。它不是控制器专属的。

默认的asp.net示例在布局页面中有:

<title>@ViewData["Title"] - MyApp</title>

在任何情况下

ViewData["Title"] = "Details";

然后，问这个问题:“ViewBag和ViewData之间有什么区别?”

最显著的区别是ViewData是一个强类型字典 ViewBag是一个动态类型。

注意里面的数据IS the SAME

ViewData["Title"] = "MyTitle";
ViewBag.Title; // returns "MyTitle";

什么时候用这个或那个?

ViewBag doesn't support not valid C# names. you can't access ViewData["Key With Space"] with ViewBag ViewBag.Something is dynamic and you may have problems when calling methods (like extension methods) that needs to know the exact parameter at compile time. ViewBag can check for nulls syntactical cleaner: ViewBag.Person?.Name ViewData have all the properties of a Dictionary like ContainsKey, Add, etc. so you can use ViewData.Add("somekey", "somevalue") keep in mind it might throw exceptions. Using ViewData on views needs TypeCasting while ViewBag don't.

知道了细微的差别，使用其中一种更像是一种口味偏好。

通常你可以想到ViewBag。ViewData别名的任意键["AnyKey"]

在ViewBag内部，属性以名称/值对的形式存储在ViewData字典中。

注意:在MVC 3的大多数预发布版本中，ViewBag属性被命名为ViewModel，这段代码来自MVC 3发布说明:

有人建议我发布我发布的这个信息的来源，下面是来源: http://www.asp.net/whitepapers/mvc3-release-notes#_Toc2_4

MVC 2 controllers support a ViewData property that enables you to pass data to a view template using a late-bound dictionary API. In MVC 3, you can also use somewhat simpler syntax with the ViewBag property to accomplish the same purpose. For example, instead of writing ViewData["Message"]="text", you can write ViewBag.Message="text". You do not need to define any strongly-typed classes to use the ViewBag property. Because it is a dynamic property, you can instead just get or set properties and it will resolve them dynamically at run time. Internally, ViewBag properties are stored as name/value pairs in the ViewData dictionary. (Note: in most pre-release versions of MVC 3, the ViewBag property was named the ViewModel property.)

有一些细微的区别，这意味着你可以使用ViewData和ViewBag与视图略有不同的方式。这篇文章http://weblogs.asp.net/hajan/archive/2010/12/11/viewbag-dynamic-in-asp-net-mvc-3-rc-2.aspx中概述了一个优点，并展示了在示例中可以通过使用ViewBag而不是ViewData来避免强制转换。

ViewData用于将数据从控制器传递给ViewData，它是从viewdatdictionary类派生出来的。仅对当前请求可用。仅要求复杂数据类型的类型转换，并检查null值以避免错误。如果发生重定向，则其值为null

ViewBag是一个动态属性，它利用了c# 4.0中的新动态特性。它也仅对当前请求可用。如果发生重定向，则其值为null

ViewBag

它返回Type Object。 它是ControllerBase类的一个动态属性。 ViewBag仅适用于。net Framework 4.0及以上版本。 因为ViewBag属性本质上是动态的，所以在使用前不需要进行类型转换。 ViewBag返回动态类型对象，它的属性也是动态的。 它比ViewData快一点。

显示数据

它返回键值字典对集合。 ViewData是一个字典对象，它是ControllerBase类的属性。 ViewData比ViewBag快。 类型转换代码在枚举时是必需的，因为它是字典对集合。 ViewData返回对象(键值对的类型和值是类型对象，所以在使用前需要转换)

public ActionResult Index()
{   
    ViewBag.Name = "";   
    return View();
}

public ActionResult Index()
{  
    ViewData["Name"] = "Arun Prakash";  
    return View();
}

视图呼叫

@ViewBag.Name    
@ViewData["Name"]

Although you might not have a technical advantage to choosing one format over the other, you should be aware of some important differences between the two syntaxes. One obvious difference is that ViewBag works only when the key you’re accessing is a valid C# identifi er. For example, if you place a value in ViewData["Key With Spaces"], you can’t access that value using ViewBag because the code won’t compile. Another key issue to consider is that you cannot pass in dynamic values as parameters to extension methods. The C# compiler must know the real type of every parameter at compile time in order to choose the correct extension method. If any parameter is dynamic, compilation will fail. For example, this code will always fail: @Html.TextBox("name", ViewBag.Name). To work around this, either use ViewData["Name"] or cast the va