有没有比下面的pausecomp函数(取自此处)更好的方法来设计JavaScript中的睡眠?

function pausecomp(millis)
{
    var date = new Date();
    var curDate = null;
    do { curDate = new Date(); }
    while(curDate-date < millis);
}

这不是JavaScript中的Sleep的重复-动作之间的延迟;我希望在函数的中间有一个真正的睡眠,而不是在代码执行之前有一段延迟。


当前回答

实际上,您可以使用与pausecomp函数相同的while循环实现sleep()(这基本上是相同的):

const sleep = (seconds) => {
    const waitUntil = new Date().getTime() + seconds * 1000
    while(new Date().getTime() < waitUntil) {
        // do nothing
    }
}

您可以像这样使用sleep()方法:

const main = () => {
    const a = 1 + 3

    // Sleep 3 seconds before the next action
    sleep(3)
    const b = a + 4

    // Sleep 4 seconds before the next action
    sleep(4)
    const c = b + 5
}

main()

这就是我想象你会使用睡眠功能的方式,而且读起来相对简单。我借鉴了另一篇文章《JavaScript中的睡眠——动作之间的延迟》,以展示您可能打算如何使用它。

不幸的是,你的电脑会变热,所有工作都会受阻。如果在浏览器中运行,该选项卡将停止,用户将无法与页面交互。

如果您将代码重组为异步的,那么您可以将setTimeout()作为与其他文章相同的睡眠函数。

// define sleep using setTimeout
const sleep = (seconds, callback) => setTimeout(() => callback(), seconds * 1000)

const main = () => {
    const a = 1 + 3
    let b = undefined
    let c = undefined

    // Sleep 3 seconds before the next action
    sleep(3, () => {
        b = a + 4

        // Sleep 4 seconds before the next action
        sleep(4, () => {
            c = b + 5
        })
    })
}

main()

正如你所说,这不是你想要的。我修改了Sleep in JavaScript中的示例-动作之间的延迟,以说明为什么会出现这种情况。当您添加更多动作时,要么需要将逻辑拉入单独的函数,要么将代码嵌套得越来越深(回调地狱)。

为了解决“回调地狱”,我们可以使用promise来定义睡眠:

const sleep = (seconds) => new Promise((resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve(), seconds * 1000)))

const main = () => {
    const a = 1 + 3
    let b = undefined
    let c = undefined

    // Sleep 3 seconds before the next action
    return sleep(3)
        .then(() => {
            b = a + 4

            // Sleep 4 seconds before the next action
            return sleep(4)
        })
        .then(() => {
            c = b + 5
        })
}

main()

Promise可以避免深度嵌套,但看起来仍然不像我们最初使用的常规同步代码。我们希望编写看起来同步的代码,但没有任何缺点。

让我们再次使用async/await重写我们的主方法:

const sleep = (seconds) => new Promise((resolve => setTimeout(() => resolve(), seconds * 1000)))

const main = async () => {
    const a = 1 + 3

    // Sleep 3 seconds before the next action
    await sleep(3)
    const b = a + 4

    // Sleep 4 seconds before the next action
    await sleep(4)
    const c = b + 5
}

main()

使用async/await,我们可以调用sleep(),就好像它是一个同步的阻塞函数一样。这解决了您可能在其他帖子中使用回调解决方案时遇到的问题,并避免了长时间循环的问题。

其他回答

现在还可以使用本机模块util来提供常规同步函数。

const { promisify } = require('util')
const sleep = promisify(setTimeout)

module.exports = () => {
  await someAsyncFunction()
  await sleep(2000)
  console.log('2 seconds later...')
}

我在JavaScript sleep/wait上搜索了很多网页。。。如果你想让JavaScript“RUN,DELAY,RUN”。。。大多数人得到的要么是“RUN,RUN(无用的东西),RUN”,要么是“RUN,RUN+延迟RUN”。。。

我想:这是一个有效的解决方案。。。但你必须把你的跑步代码切碎…:是的,我知道,这只是一个更容易理解的重构。。。还

示例1:

<html>
<body>
<div id="id1">DISPLAY</div>

<script>
// JavaScript sleep by "therealdealsince1982"; copyrighted 2009
// setInterval
var i = 0;

function run() {
    // Pieces of codes to run
    if (i == 0){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (i == 1){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (i == 2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (i >2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (i == 5){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>all code segment finished running</p>"; clearInterval(t); } // End interval, stops run
    i++; // Segment of code finished running, next...
}

run();
t = setInterval("run()", 1000);

</script>
</body>
</html>

示例2:

<html>
<body>
<div id="id1">DISPLAY</div>

<script>
// JavaScript sleep by "therealdealsince1982"; copyrighted 2009
// setTimeout
var i = 0;

function run() {
    // Pieces of codes to run, can use switch statement
    if (i == 0){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " ran</p>"; sleep(1000);}
    if (i == 1){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " ran</p>"; sleep(2000);}
    if (i == 2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " ran</p>"; sleep(3000);}
    if (i == 3){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + i + " ran</p>";} //stops automatically
    i++;
}

function sleep(dur) {t=setTimeout("run()", dur);} // Starts flow control again after 'dur'

run(); // Starts
</script>
</body>
</html>

示例3:

<html>
<body>
<div id="id1">DISPLAY</div>

<script>
// JavaScript sleep by "therealdealsince1982"; copyrighted 2009
// setTimeout
var i = 0;

function flow() {
    run(i);
    i++; // Code segment finished running, increment i; can put elsewhere
    sleep(1000);
    if (i == 5) {clearTimeout(t);} // Stops flow, must be after sleep()
}

function run(segment) {
    // Pieces of codes to run, can use switch statement
    if (segment == 0){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment == 1){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment == 2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment >2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment "+ segment +" is ran</p>"; }
}

function sleep(dur) {t=setTimeout("flow()", dur);} // Starts flow control again after 'dur'

flow(); // Starts flow
</script>
</body>
</html>

示例4:

<html>
<body>
<div id="id1">DISPLAY</div>

<script>
// JavaScript sleep by "therealdealsince1982"; copyrighted 2009
// setTimeout, switch
var i = 0;

function flow() {
    switch(i)
    {
        case 0:
            run(i);
            sleep(1000);
            break;
        case 1:
            run(i);
            sleep(2000);
            break;
        case 5:
            run(i);
            clearTimeout(t); // Stops flow
            break;
        default:
            run(i);
            sleep(3000);
            break;
    }
}

function run(segment) {
    // Pieces of codes to run, can use switch statement
    if (segment == 0){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment == 1){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment == 2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    if (segment >2){document.getElementById("id1").innerHTML= "<p>code segment " + segment + " is ran</p>"; }
    i++; // Current segment of code finished running, next...
}

function sleep(dur) {t=setTimeout("flow()", dur);} // Starts flow control again after 'dur'

flow(); // Starts flow control for first time...
</script>
</body>
</html>

需要使用“休眠”方法的对象的方法,如下所示:

function SomeObject() {
    this.SomeProperty = "xxx";
    return this;
}
SomeObject.prototype.SomeMethod = function () {
    this.DoSomething1(arg1);
    sleep(500);
    this.DoSomething2(arg1);
}

几乎可以翻译为:

function SomeObject() {
    this.SomeProperty = "xxx";
    return this;
}
SomeObject.prototype.SomeMethod = function (arg1) {
    var self = this;
    self.DoSomething1(arg1);
    setTimeout(function () {
        self.DoSomething2(arg1);
    }, 500);
}

不同之处在于,“SomeMethod”操作在执行操作“DoSomething2”之前返回。“SomeMethod”的调用者不能依赖于此。由于“睡眠”方法不存在,我使用后一种方法并相应地设计代码。

你不能在JavaScript中做这样的睡眠,或者更确切地说,你不应该这样做。运行sleep或while循环将导致用户的浏览器挂起,直到循环完成。

使用您引用的链接中指定的计时器。

对于浏览器,我同意使用setTimeout和setInterval。

但是对于服务器端代码,它可能需要一个阻塞函数(例如,这样可以有效地进行线程同步)。

如果您正在使用Node.js和Meteor,您可能遇到了在光纤中使用setTimeout的限制。下面是服务器端睡眠的代码。

var Fiber = require('fibers');

function sleep(ms) {
    var fiber = Fiber.current;
    setTimeout(function() {
        fiber.run();
    }, ms);
    Fiber.yield();
}

Fiber(function() {
    console.log('wait... ' + new Date);
    sleep(1000);
    console.log('ok... ' + new Date);
}).run();
console.log('back in main');

参见:Node.js光纤,睡眠