视觉是大多数程序员认为理所当然的感官之一。大多数程序员会花几个小时盯着电脑显示器(尤其是在他们全神贯注的时候),但我知道有些程序员是盲人(比如目前在谷歌工作的T.V. Raman)。
如果您是一个盲人(或逐渐失明),您将如何设置您的开发环境来帮助您编程?
(每个回答一个建议。这个问题的目的是把好的想法带到最高层。此外,屏幕阅读器可以更早地阅读到好的想法。)
视觉是大多数程序员认为理所当然的感官之一。大多数程序员会花几个小时盯着电脑显示器(尤其是在他们全神贯注的时候),但我知道有些程序员是盲人(比如目前在谷歌工作的T.V. Raman)。
如果您是一个盲人(或逐渐失明),您将如何设置您的开发环境来帮助您编程?
(每个回答一个建议。这个问题的目的是把好的想法带到最高层。此外,屏幕阅读器可以更早地阅读到好的想法。)
当前回答
在我读研究生的时候,我们的研究团队中有一个盲人。他年纪大一点,大概四十五岁左右。他向我们讲述了他如何编写自己的第一台计算机(那时候文本语音转换还不普及),以莫尔斯电码输出屏幕上的内容。为了克服这个明显的“先有鸡还是先有蛋”的问题,他每次都必须从头开始重写代码,直到代码能够正常工作,可以重新读给他听为止。
现在他使用文本转语音,尽管他在实际编写任何代码之前都非常彻底地计划了代码,以最小化调试循环。
他还非常擅长做ppt演讲,尽管他视力不好,但格式和其他视力正常的演讲者一样好。
其他回答
I am a blind developer and I work under Windows, GNU Linux and MacOS X. Each of platform has different workflows for blind users. This depends on the screen reader that the blind developer uses. Development tools are not completely accessible for blind developers. I can type code and use compiling functions in all IDEs but there are many problems if I have to design an interface using designing tools as Interface Builder, XGlade or other. When I was developing with Borland Delphi I could add a control, a Button for example, and I could modify each visual attribute of the control using object inspector window. Many IDEs use object inspector windows to modify visual and non visual attributes but the problem for a blind developer is add new controls because the method to add a new control consists of dragging and dropping a control from the palette to the canvas. Visual studio 200x uses alternative methods to do this but the interface of the IDE changes in each new version and this is a big problem because screen readers for Windows need special support, using scripts, to identify each area of some non standar applications. A blind developer can use Visual studio 2008 with his screen reader but when a new version of this IDE appears he has to wait for a new version of scripts for this version of the IDE. Xcode with Interface builder has no alternative for dragging and dropping tasks yet. I asked it to Apple many times but they are working in other things. I published 3 apps in the App store (Accessible minesweeper, accessible fruitmachine and Programar a ciegas RSS) and I had to design all the interface by code. It's a hard work but I can manage all features of each control. Eclipse has an accessible code editor but other development tools as debug console,plugins for designing or documentation area present problems for assistive tools for blind users.
对于盲目的开发人员来说,文档也是一个问题。许多示例和演示使用图像来显示解释(在图片中设置环境设置)
我认为问题不在于盲目。问题是,公司和开发团队认为可访问性会影响最终的软件,但它不会影响开发软件。他们认为盲人用户可以成为客户,但盲人用户不能成为开发伙伴。
盲人协会要求产品和服务的可访问性,但他们忘记了盲人开发者。盲人可以当律师、记者、教师,但盲人开发者即使对盲人来说也是一个奇怪的概念。很多时候我感到孤独,因为我的一些盲人朋友不能理解我的工作。
你可以在这篇西班牙文的文章中阅读我对这个问题的看法,在我的博客http://www.programaraciegas.net/2010/11/05/la-accesibilidad-en-crisis-para-los-desarrolladores-ciegos/ 网页中有一个翻译工具。对不起,我没有翻译。
盲文键盘到底是什么?
有像盲文书写器这样的东西,但你永远不会用它作为计算机的输入设备。
如果你只是在谈论一个带有盲文符号的键盘,这也是一个非常糟糕的主意。当你打字的时候,你会有更多的键要触到,而且它仍然会变慢。
触摸打字不是一种视觉技能,盲人也能做到和正常人一样好。
我是一个完全失明的大学生,有过几次编程实习,所以我的答案将基于这些。我使用windows xp作为我的操作系统,“大白鲨”用合成语音来阅读屏幕上出现的内容。对于java编程,我使用eclipse,因为它是一个可访问的功能齐全的IDE。
根据我的经验,使用SWT作为GUI工具包的java程序比使用Swing的程序更容易访问,这就是为什么我远离netbeans的原因。对于任何。net编程,我都使用visual studio 2005,因为它是我实习时使用的标准版本,使用Jaws和一组脚本非常容易访问,这些脚本是为了使表单设计器等东西更容易访问而开发的。
对于C和c++编程,我使用cygwin和gcc作为我的编译器,emacs或vim作为我的编辑器,这取决于我需要做什么。我的很多实习工作都是为Z/OS编程。我使用rlogin会话通过Cygwin访问大型机上的USS子系统,并使用C3270作为我的3270模拟器访问大型机的ISPF部分。
我通常依赖于合成语音,但也有盲文显示。我发现我通常用语音工作得更快,但在标点符号很重要且复杂的情况下使用盲文显示。这方面的例子是带有大量嵌套括号和JCL的if语句,其中标点符号非常重要。
更新
我正在cygwin http://emacspeak.sourceforge.net下使用Emacspeak,我不确定这是否可以用作编程编辑器,因为它似乎有点反应不太好,但我还没有查看任何配置选项。
有一次我遇到了Sam Hartman,他是一个著名的Debian开发人员,从2000年开始,他是盲人。在这次采访中,他谈到了Linux用户的可访问性。他使用Debian和Gnome -orca作为屏幕阅读器,它与Gnome一起工作,并且“在Iceweasel/Firefox和Libreoffice方面做得相对不错”。
在谈到编程时,他说:
虽然[地精-虎鲸]会说地精终端,但它真的不够好 说终端程序,我很舒服地使用它。所以,我跑了 Emacspeak包。在其中,我运行Emacs 在终端模拟器中,我倾向于运行Screen。为了增加 有趣的是,我经常在内部运行额外的Emacs实例 屏幕。
我是个盲人,在过去的12年里一直是一名程序员。目前,我是一名高级架构师,在Sapient公司(一家总部位于剑桥的咨询公司,创建基于web和基于厚客户端的企业解决方案)工作。 我使用了几个屏幕阅读器,但大多数情况下都坚持使用Jaws用于窗口和NVDA。
I have mostly worked on the Microsoft platform and visual studio as my environment. I also use tools like the MS Sql enterprise studio and others for DB access, network monitoring etc. I tried to spend some time with emacspeak but since my work was mostly based on the MS platform, never really spent a lot of time there. I have also spent a couple of years working on C++ on linux - mostly used notepad or visual studio on windows for all the coding and then samba to share files with the linux environment. Also used borland C for some experimental stuff. Have recently been playing around with python, which as other people have noted above is particularly unfriendly for a blind user because it is written using indentation as the nesting mechanism. Having said that, NVDA, the most popular open source screen reader is written completely using python and some of the commiters on that project are themself blind. A particularly interesting question I get frequently asked as an architect is how do I deal with diagrams - UML and visio and rational rose etc. Visio is probably the most accessible diagraming tool out there. I was able to write jaws scripts to read rational rose diagrams for me. I've used a tool called T-dub (technical diagram understanding for the blind) developed by some german university for accessing UML 2.0 diagrams. Have used a java-based ugly tool called magic draw for doing model-driven development and was a commiter on the androMDA project and helped develop the .Net code generator from a UML model.
In general, I find that I thrive most in a team environment where I can work on my strengths. For example, while a diagram is extremely useful to communicate/document a design, the actual design process involves a lot of thinking and brainstorming and when the design has been thought out, one of your team mates can help you quickly put together a neatly drawn picture out of it. People incorrectly mis-construe the above to be lack of independence or ability while I see this as pure inter-dependence -- as in I am sure that the team mate alone could never have come up with that design on his/her own and in-turn, if I depend on him to document the design, so be it. Most hurdles I face are tool-based inaccessibility. For example all oracle products have been progressively declining in accessibility over the years (shame on them) and a team environment basically allows me an extra layer of defense against these over and above my screen readers and custom scripts.