在我最近的应用程序中，我遇到了一个严重的伪随机数生成器问题:我多次通过Python脚本调用我的C程序，并使用以下代码作为种子:

srand(time(NULL))

然而,由于:

Rand将生成相同的伪随机序列，在srand中给出相同的种子(参见man srand); 如前所述，time函数每秒只会变化:如果应用程序在同一秒内运行多次，time每次都会返回相同的值。

我的程序生成了相同的数字序列。 你可以做三件事来解决这个问题:

mix time output with some other information changing on runs (in my application, the output name): srand(time(NULL) | getHashOfString(outputName)) I used djb2 as my hash function. Increase time resolution. On my platform, clock_gettime was available, so I use it: #include<time.h> struct timespec nanos; clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &nanos) srand(nanos.tv_nsec); Use both methods together: #include<time.h> struct timespec nanos; clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &nanos) srand(nanos.tv_nsec | getHashOfString(outputName));

选项3确保了你(据我所知)最好的种子随机性，但它可能只会在非常快速的应用中产生差异。 在我看来，选择2是一个安全的赌注。

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

void main() 
{
    int visited[100];
    int randValue, a, b, vindex = 0;

    randValue = (rand() % 100) + 1;

    while (vindex < 100) {
        for (b = 0; b < vindex; b++) {
            if (visited[b] == randValue) {
                randValue = (rand() % 100) + 1;
                b = 0;
            }
        }

        visited[vindex++] = randValue;
    }

    for (a = 0; a < 100; a++)
        printf("%d ", visited[a]);
}

Rand()是生成随机数最方便的方法。

你也可以从任何在线服务如random.org捕获随机数。

下面是我的方法(围绕rand()的包装器):

我还扩展到允许min为INT_MIN而max为INT_MAX的情况，这通常不可能单独使用rand()，因为它返回从0到RAND_MAX的值，包括(1/2范围)。

像这样使用它:

const int MIN = 1;
const int MAX = 1024;
// Get a pseudo-random number between MIN and MAX, **inclusive**.
// Seeding of the pseudo-random number generator automatically occurs
// the very first time you call it.
int random_num = utils_rand(MIN, MAX);

定义和氧描述:

#include <assert.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
#include <stdlib.h>

/// \brief      Use linear interpolation to rescale, or "map" value `val` from range
///             `in_min` to `in_max`, inclusive, to range `out_min` to `out_max`, inclusive.
/// \details    Similar to Arduino's ingenious `map()` function:
///             https://www.arduino.cc/reference/en/language/functions/math/map/
///
/// TODO(gabriel): turn this into a gcc statement expression instead to prevent the potential for
/// the "double evaluation" bug. See `MIN()` and `MAX()` above.
#define UTILS_MAP(val, in_min, in_max, out_min, out_max) \
    (((val) - (in_min)) * ((out_max) - (out_min)) / ((in_max) - (in_min)) + (out_min))

/// \brief      Obtain a pseudo-random integer value between `min` and `max`, **inclusive**.
/// \details    1. If `(max - min + 1) > RAND_MAX`, then the range of values returned will be
///             **scaled** to the range `max - min + 1`, and centered over the center of the
///             range at `(min + max)/2`. Scaling the numbers means that in the case of scaling,
///             not all numbers can even be reached. However, you will still be assured to have
///             a random distribution of numbers across the full range.
///             2. Also, the first time per program run that you call this function, it will
///             automatically seed the pseudo-random number generator with your system's
///             current time in seconds.
/// \param[in]  min         The minimum pseudo-random number you'd like, inclusive. Can be positive
///                         OR negative.
/// \param[in]  max         The maximum pseudo-random number you'd like, inclusive. Can be positive
///                         OR negative.
/// \return     A pseudo-random integer value between `min` and `max`, **inclusive**.
int utils_rand(int min, int max)
{
    static bool first_run = true;
    if (first_run)
    {
        // seed the pseudo-random number generator with the seconds time the very first run
        time_t time_now_sec = time(NULL);
        srand(time_now_sec);
        first_run = false;
    }

    int range = max - min + 1;
    int random_num = rand();  // random num from 0 to RAND_MAX, inclusive

    if (range > RAND_MAX)
    {
        static_assert(
            sizeof(long int) > sizeof(int),
            "This must be true or else the below mapping/scaling may have undefined overflow "
            "and not work properly. In such a case, try casting to `long long int` instead of "
            "just `long int`, and update this static_assert accordingly.");

        random_num = UTILS_MAP((long int)random_num, (long int)0, (long int)RAND_MAX, (long int)min,
                               (long int)max);
        return random_num;
    }

    // This is presumably a faster approach than the map/scaling function above, so do this faster
    // approach below whenever you don't **have** to do the more-complicated approach above.
    random_num %= range;
    random_num += min;

    return random_num;
}

参见:

[我在写下上面的答案后发现了这个问答，但它显然非常相关，他们对非缩放范围的情况做了同样的事情]我如何从rand()中获得特定的数字范围? [我需要进一步研究和阅读这个答案-似乎有一些好的观点，保持良好的随机性不使用模量]我如何从rand()得到一个特定的数字范围? http://c-faq.com/lib/randrange.html

您可以使用悬浮指针的概念。

指向已删除(或释放)内存位置的指针称为悬浮指针。

它将在打印时显示随机值。

FWIW，答案是肯定的，有一个stdlib.h函数叫rand;此函数主要针对速度和分布进行调优，而不是针对不可预测性。几乎所有语言和框架的内置随机函数都默认使用这个函数。还有“加密”随机数生成器，它们的可预测性要低得多，但运行速度要慢得多。在任何类型的与安全相关的应用程序中都应该使用它们。