这个问题来自于对过去50年左右计算领域各种进展的评论。
其他一些与会者请我把这个问题作为一个问题向整个论坛提出。
这里的基本思想不是抨击事物的现状,而是试图理解提出基本新思想和原则的过程。
我认为我们在大多数计算领域都需要真正的新想法,我想知道最近已经完成的任何重要而有力的想法。如果我们真的找不到他们,那么我们应该问“为什么?”和“我们应该做什么?”
这个问题来自于对过去50年左右计算领域各种进展的评论。
其他一些与会者请我把这个问题作为一个问题向整个论坛提出。
这里的基本思想不是抨击事物的现状,而是试图理解提出基本新思想和原则的过程。
我认为我们在大多数计算领域都需要真正的新想法,我想知道最近已经完成的任何重要而有力的想法。如果我们真的找不到他们,那么我们应该问“为什么?”和“我们应该做什么?”
当前回答
收缩包装软件
在1980年以前,软件大多是专门编写的。如果你经营一家企业,想要计算机化,你通常会有一台计算机、编译器和数据库,然后自己写东西。业务软件通常是为适应业务实践而编写的。这并不是说没有固定的软件(我在1980年之前使用SPSS),但这不是常态,我看到的往往是基础设施和研究软件。
现在,你可以去电脑商店,在货架上找到经营小生意所需的一切。它的设计并不是为了无缝地适应您曾经拥有的任何实践,但是一旦您学会或多或少地按照它的工作流程工作,它就会很好地工作。像SAP和仁科(PeopleSoft)这样的大企业比过去更接近于收缩包装。
这并不是一个彻底的突破,但在1980年之后,有一个非常明确的转变,从昂贵的定制软件到低成本的现成软件,灵活性从软件转移到业务流程。
它还影响了软件的经济性。定制软件解决方案可以盈利,但无法规模化。你只能向一个客户收取这么多钱,你不能把同样的东西卖给多个客户。使用收缩包装软件,你可以卖出很多很多相同的东西,在一个非常大的销售基础上摊销开发成本。(你必须提供支持,但这是有限度的。就当这是销售软件的边际成本吧。)
Theoretically, where there are big winners from a change, there are going to be losers. So far, the business of software has kept expanding, so that as areas become commoditized other areas open up. This is likely to come to an end sometime, and moderately talented developers will find themselves in a real crunch, unable to work for the big boys and crowded out of the market. (This presumably happens for other fields; I suspect the demand for accountants is much smaller than it would be without QuickBooks and the like.)
其他回答
个人广播通信
Facebook、Twitter、Buzz、柴酷……实现是不同的,侧重于不同的方面-管理受众,简洁性,讨论。特定的服务来来去去,但新的通信概念仍然存在。博客当然是这一切的开端,但新的服务使交流变得具有社会性,这是一个本质的区别。
虽然不太确定这是否属于计算的范畴,但这是很重要的,只有通过计算和网络才能实现。
当然,1980年以前是施乐PARC的辉煌时期。在图形用户界面、鼠标、激光打印机、互联网和个人电脑刚刚诞生的时候。(鉴于我太年轻了,不可能活在那个年代,而你几乎在努力发明所有这些东西,关于1980年的事情,我不能告诉你任何你不知道的事情,所以我们继续吧。)
The thing is, though, that the pre-1980 days were a lot more vibrant in terms of truly disruptive new technologies. That's the way it is with any new field -- hwo many game-changing technology advances have you seen in railroads in the past 100 years? How many have you seen in lightbulbs? In the printing press? Once something ignites a hype in the right circles, there is an explosive period of invention, followed by a long period of maturing. After that, you're not going to see the same kind of completely radical changes again UNLESS the basic circumstances change.
幸运的是,这可能会发生在一些领域,而且已经发生在其他一些领域:
Mobility - smart phones bring computing to a truly portable platform, which will soon include location-based services and proximity-based ad-hoc networks. It's a completely new paradigm that's potentially as game-changing as the GUI has been The WWW (HTTP, HTML and DNS) has already been mentioned and is an obvious addition to the list, since it is enabling global, inexpensive, mainstream rich communication across the globe - all thanks to a computing platform On the interface side, both touch, multitouch (Jeff Han comes to mind) and the Wiimote need mentioning. Currently, they are basically curiosities, but so were the early GUIs. OOP design patterns -- higher level solutions as best practices to hard problems. Depending on your definition of 'computing', it may or may not belong on the list, but if you count OOP as a significant advance pre-1980 (I certainly do), I think design patterns and the GoF deserve a mention too Google's PageRank and MapReduce algorithms - I am pleased to notice I wasn't the first to mention them, and seriously --- where would the world be without the principles of both of them? I vividly remember what the world looked like before them, and suffice it to say Google really IS my friend. Non-volatile memory -- it's on the hardware side, but it is going to play a significant role in the future of computing - making bootup times a thing of the past, for example, and enabling us to use computers in entirely new ways Semantic (natural language) search / analysis / classification / translation... We're not quite there yet, but companies like Powerset give the impression that we're on the brink. On that note, intelligent HTMs should be on this list as well. I am yet another believer in Jeff Hawkins' model and approach, and if it works, it will mean a complete redefinition of what computers can do, what it means to be human, and where the world can go from here. Creating a real intelligence in that way (synthetically) would be bigger than anything the human race has accomplished before. GNU + Linux 3D printing / rapid prototyping (and, in time, manufacturing) P2P (which also lead to VoIP etc.) E-ink, once the technologies mature a bit more RFID might belong on the list, but the verdict is still out on that one Quantum Computing is the most obvious element on the list, except we still haven't been able to get enough qubits to play along. However, my friends in the field tell me there's incredible progress going on even as we speak, so I'm holding my breath for that one. And finally, I want to mention a personal favourite: distributed intelligence, or its other name: artificial artificial intelligence. The idea of connecting a huge number of people in a network and allowing them access to the combined minds of everyone else through some form of question answering interface. It's been done a number of times recently, with Yahoo Answers, Askville, Amazon Mechanical Turk, and so on, but in my mind, those are all missing the mark by a LOT... much like the many implementations of distributed hypertext that came before Tim Berners-Lee's HTML, or the many web crawlers before Google. Seriously -- someone needs to build an search interface into 'the hive mind' to blow everyone else out of the water. IMHO - it is only a matter of time.
数字音乐合成器。
我认为,整个音乐场景都受到了廉价复调合成器的影响。 早期的复调合成器是有效地多个模拟合成器(离散或使用CEM或SSM芯片)。它们都很昂贵,而且数量有限。在80年代,第一个数字系统出现了(我不确定,但我认为Kurzweil是第一个)。 今天,大多数都是数字的——甚至模拟的也是典型的“虚拟模拟”。
问候
编辑:哎呀-我刚刚发现CMI灯管是在1978年发明的。忘掉上面的,抱歉。
有一件事让我吃惊,那就是简陋的电子表格。非程序员的人用一个简单的公式网格就可以为现实世界的问题构建狂野而奇妙的解决方案。在桌面应用程序中复制他们的努力通常需要比编写电子表格多10到100倍的时间,最终的应用程序通常更难使用,充满bug !
我相信电子表格成功的关键是自动依赖分析。如果电子表格的用户被迫使用观察者模式,他们就没有机会得到正确的结果。
因此,最大的进步是自动依赖分析。现在,为什么没有任何现代平台(Java, .Net, Web Services)将其构建到系统的核心中呢?特别是在一个通过并行化扩展的时代——依赖关系图导致并行重新计算变得微不足道。
编辑:我刚查过。VisiCalc发布于1979年——让我们假设它是1980年后的发明。
Edit2:似乎艾伦已经注意到了电子表格——如果让他来这个论坛的问题是正确的!
不确定1980年的情况,但人工智能社区几十年来一直是一个创意生成器,他们仍然在做。