如果你想要一些快速和肮脏的东西，我建议使用秒表代替更大程度的精度。

Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();
// Do Work
sw.Stop();

Console.WriteLine("Elapsed time: {0}", sw.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds);

或者，如果你需要一些更复杂的东西，你可能应该考虑使用第三方分析器，如ANTS。

因为我不太关心精度，所以我最终比较了它们。我正在捕获网络上的大量数据包，我想在我收到每个数据包时放置时间。下面是测试500万次迭代的代码

    int iterations = 5000000;

    // Test using datetime.now
    {
        var date = DateTime.UtcNow.AddHours(DateTime.UtcNow.Second);

        var now = DateTime.UtcNow;

        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            if (date == DateTime.Now)
                Console.WriteLine("it is!");
        }
        Console.WriteLine($"Done executing {iterations} iterations using datetime.now. It took {(DateTime.UtcNow - now).TotalSeconds} seconds");
    }

    // Test using datetime.utcnow
    {
        var date = DateTime.UtcNow.AddHours(DateTime.UtcNow.Second);

        var now = DateTime.UtcNow;

        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            if (date == DateTime.UtcNow)
                Console.WriteLine("it is!");
        }
        Console.WriteLine($"Done executing {iterations} iterations using datetime.utcnow. It took {(DateTime.UtcNow - now).TotalSeconds} seconds");
    }

    // Test using stopwatch
    {
        Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
        sw.Start();

        var now = DateTime.UtcNow;

        for (int i = 0; i < iterations; i++)
        {
            if (sw.ElapsedTicks == DateTime.Now.Ticks)
                Console.WriteLine("it is!");
        }
        Console.WriteLine($"Done executing {iterations} iterations using stopwatch. It took {(DateTime.UtcNow - now).TotalSeconds} seconds");
    }

输出结果为:

Done executing 5000000 iterations using datetime.now. It took 0.8685502 seconds 
Done executing 5000000 iterations using datetime.utcnow. It took 0.1074324 seconds 
Done executing 5000000 iterations using stopwatch. It took 0.9625021 seconds

总之，DateTime。如果您不太关心精度，UtcNow是最快的。这也支持了这个问题的答案https://stackoverflow.com/a/6986472/637142。

使用System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch类。

Stopwatch sw = new Stopwatch();
sw.Start();

// Do some code.

sw.Stop();

// sw.ElapsedMilliseconds = the time your "do some code" took.

不，不是。使用秒表(在系统诊断中)

Stopwatch sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
PerformWork();
sw.Stop();

Console.WriteLine("Time taken: {0}ms", sw.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds);

秒表自动检查是否存在高精度计时器。

值得一提的是DateTime。Now通常比DateTime慢一些。UtcNow是因为需要在时区、夏令时等方面做一些工作。

DateTime。UtcNow的分辨率通常为15毫秒。请看John Chapman关于DateTime的博客文章。现在我们来做一个精确的总结。

有趣的琐事:秒表回落到DateTime。UtcNow如果你的硬件不支持高频计数器。你可以通过查看静态字段Stopwatch. ishighresolution来检查Stopwatch是否使用硬件来实现高精度。

这是正确的方法:

using System;
using System.Diagnostics;

class Program
{
    public static void Main()
    {
        Stopwatch stopWatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();

            // some other code

        stopWatch.Stop();

        // this not correct to get full timer resolution
        Console.WriteLine("{0} ms", stopWatch.ElapsedMilliseconds);

        // Correct way to get accurate high precision timing
        Console.WriteLine("{0} ms", stopWatch.Elapsed.TotalMilliseconds);
    }
}

要了解更多信息，请使用秒表而不是DataTime来获得准确的性能计数器。

我很少做这种性能检查(我倾向于认为“这个很慢，让它快一点”)，所以我几乎总是这样做。

谷歌确实显示了许多用于性能检查的资源/文章。

许多人提到使用pinvoke来获取性能信息。我研究的很多材料都只提到了使用perfmon..

编辑:

看过秒表的对话..好了!我学到了一些东西:)

这篇文章看起来不错