下面是我使用链表实现的堆栈和队列:

// Linked List function Node(data) { this.data = data; this.next = null; } // Stack implemented using LinkedList function Stack() { this.top = null; } Stack.prototype.push = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); newNode.next = this.top; //Special attention this.top = newNode; } Stack.prototype.pop = function() { if (this.top !== null) { var topItem = this.top.data; this.top = this.top.next; return topItem; } return null; } Stack.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.top; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } // var stack = new Stack(); // stack.push(3); // stack.push(5); // stack.push(7); // stack.print(); // Queue implemented using LinkedList function Queue() { this.head = null; this.tail = null; } Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); if (this.head === null) { this.head = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } else { this.tail.next = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } } Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() { var newNode; if (this.head !== null) { newNode = this.head.data; this.head = this.head.next; } return newNode; } Queue.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.head; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } var queue = new Queue(); queue.enqueue(3); queue.enqueue(5); queue.enqueue(7); queue.print(); queue.dequeue(); queue.dequeue(); queue.print();

下面是我使用链表实现的堆栈和队列:

// Linked List function Node(data) { this.data = data; this.next = null; } // Stack implemented using LinkedList function Stack() { this.top = null; } Stack.prototype.push = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); newNode.next = this.top; //Special attention this.top = newNode; } Stack.prototype.pop = function() { if (this.top !== null) { var topItem = this.top.data; this.top = this.top.next; return topItem; } return null; } Stack.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.top; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } // var stack = new Stack(); // stack.push(3); // stack.push(5); // stack.push(7); // stack.print(); // Queue implemented using LinkedList function Queue() { this.head = null; this.tail = null; } Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); if (this.head === null) { this.head = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } else { this.tail.next = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } } Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() { var newNode; if (this.head !== null) { newNode = this.head.data; this.head = this.head.next; } return newNode; } Queue.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.head; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } var queue = new Queue(); queue.enqueue(3); queue.enqueue(5); queue.enqueue(7); queue.print(); queue.dequeue(); queue.dequeue(); queue.print();

Create a pair of classes that provide the various methods that each of these data structures has (push, pop, peek, etc). Now implement the methods. If you're familiar with the concepts behind stack/queue, this should be pretty straightforward. You can implement the stack with an array, and a queue with a linked list, although there are certainly other ways to go about it. Javascript will make this easy, because it is weakly typed, so you don't even have to worry about generic types, which you'd have to do if you were implementing it in Java or C#.

As many have said: native array using push and pop is fine for a stack, but using shift for taking elements from a queue means that the remaining elements need to move, which is potentially slow. The idea of using two stacks to make a queue in kevinyu's answer is a nice idea to fix it, and of course that can be done with native-array-stacks as well. (Edit: there was actually already an answer by Yuki-Dreamer that does this, albeit less compactly. I didn't notice it until now because it was unfairly downvoted.)

下面是一个使用ES5/ES6特性的紧凑实现，它使队列对象的行为尽可能接近本机的push/shift变体，除了每次操作花费O(1)平摊时间:

const queue = () => {
    const a = [], b = [];
    return {
        push: (...elts) => a.push(...elts),
        shift: () => {
            if (b.length === 0) {
                while (a.length > 0) { b.push(a.pop()) }
            }
            return b.pop();
        },
        get length() { return a.length + b.length }
    }
}

现在你可以做:

const q = queue();
q.push(8);
q.push(9);
q.push(10);
console.log(q.length);          // outputs 3
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 8
q.push(11);
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 9
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 10
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 11
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs undefined

队列实现对长度使用getter语法，使其看起来像一个属性，并对push使用rest参数语法，以允许一次推送多个内容。如果你不想这样做，你可以用push: elt => a.push(elt)，替换第4行。(但是请注意，你不能用push: a.push替换它，就像我自己第一次尝试的那样，结果非常奇怪:这是因为它导致本机push方法被调用，并设置为队列对象。)

数组。

栈:

var stack = [];

//put value on top of stack
stack.push(1);

//remove value from top of stack
var value = stack.pop();

队列:

var queue = [];

//put value on end of queue
queue.push(1);

//Take first value from queue
var value = queue.shift();

很抱歉碰到这个话题，但我滚动了许多答案，没有看到任何基于对象的队列的实现，它可以用O(1)执行排队和出队列，并且没有浪费内存。

Dmitri Pavlutin在他的博客https://dmitripavlutin.com/javascript-queue/上有一个很好的入门代码

它只遗漏了一个长度为0的检查，这是很容易添加的。

这个解决方案的最大和唯一的问题是不断增长的索引可能会在某一点上达到一些数量限制，如果队列运行很长时间和/或高速(我的意图是处理音频=高速)。

这个问题没有完美的解决方案……最简单的方法是在队列为空时将索引重置为0。

最后，我添加了一个重构方法，它将所有索引移回开始，以在队列永远不为空的情况下使用。

性能无疑是更好的(以毫秒为单位的时间，排队10000个号码然后退出它们):

class QueueObject {
  constructor () {
    this.data = {}
    this.head = 0
    this.tail = 0
    this.length = 0
  }
  enqueue (value) {
    this.data[this.tail++] = value
    this.length++
  }
  dequeue () {
    let value
    if (this.length > 0) {
      this.length--
      value = this.data[this.head]
      delete this.data[this.head++]
    } else {
      this.head = 0
      this.tail = 0
      value = null
    }
    return value
  }
  refactor () {
    if (this.head > 0) {
      for (let i = this.head; i < this.tail; i++) {
        this.data[i - this.head] = this.data[i]
        delete this.data[i]
      }
      this.tail = this.length
      this.head = 0
    }
  }
}