下面是一个队列的链表版本，它也包括最后一个节点，这是@perkins建议的，也是最合适的。

// QUEUE Object Definition

var Queue = function() {
  this.first = null;
  this.last = null;
  this.size = 0;
};

var Node = function(data) {
  this.data = data;
  this.next = null;
};

Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) {
  var node = new Node(data);

  if (!this.first){ // for empty list first and last are the same
    this.first = node;
    this.last = node;
  } else { // otherwise we stick it on the end
    this.last.next=node;
    this.last=node;
  }

  this.size += 1;
  return node;
};

Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() {
  if (!this.first) //check for empty list
    return null;

  temp = this.first; // grab top of list
  if (this.first==this.last) {
    this.last=null;  // when we need to pop the last one
  }
  this.first = this.first.next; // move top of list down
  this.size -= 1;
  return temp;
};

下面是一个队列的链表版本，它也包括最后一个节点，这是@perkins建议的，也是最合适的。

// QUEUE Object Definition

var Queue = function() {
  this.first = null;
  this.last = null;
  this.size = 0;
};

var Node = function(data) {
  this.data = data;
  this.next = null;
};

Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) {
  var node = new Node(data);

  if (!this.first){ // for empty list first and last are the same
    this.first = node;
    this.last = node;
  } else { // otherwise we stick it on the end
    this.last.next=node;
    this.last=node;
  }

  this.size += 1;
  return node;
};

Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() {
  if (!this.first) //check for empty list
    return null;

  temp = this.first; // grab top of list
  if (this.first==this.last) {
    this.last=null;  // when we need to pop the last one
  }
  this.first = this.first.next; // move top of list down
  this.size -= 1;
  return temp;
};

很抱歉碰到这个话题，但我滚动了许多答案，没有看到任何基于对象的队列的实现，它可以用O(1)执行排队和出队列，并且没有浪费内存。

Dmitri Pavlutin在他的博客https://dmitripavlutin.com/javascript-queue/上有一个很好的入门代码

它只遗漏了一个长度为0的检查，这是很容易添加的。

这个解决方案的最大和唯一的问题是不断增长的索引可能会在某一点上达到一些数量限制，如果队列运行很长时间和/或高速(我的意图是处理音频=高速)。

这个问题没有完美的解决方案……最简单的方法是在队列为空时将索引重置为0。

最后，我添加了一个重构方法，它将所有索引移回开始，以在队列永远不为空的情况下使用。

性能无疑是更好的(以毫秒为单位的时间，排队10000个号码然后退出它们):

class QueueObject {
  constructor () {
    this.data = {}
    this.head = 0
    this.tail = 0
    this.length = 0
  }
  enqueue (value) {
    this.data[this.tail++] = value
    this.length++
  }
  dequeue () {
    let value
    if (this.length > 0) {
      this.length--
      value = this.data[this.head]
      delete this.data[this.head++]
    } else {
      this.head = 0
      this.tail = 0
      value = null
    }
    return value
  }
  refactor () {
    if (this.head > 0) {
      for (let i = this.head; i < this.tail; i++) {
        this.data[i - this.head] = this.data[i]
        delete this.data[i]
      }
      this.tail = this.length
      this.head = 0
    }
  }
}

数组是Javascript中的堆栈。只需使用arr.push(x)和y = arr.pop()。

下面是用Javascript实现队列的最简单方法，对于enqueue(x)和y = dequeue()，它的平摊时间都是O(1)。它使用从插入索引到元素的映射。

function newQueue() {
    return {
        headIdx: 0,
        tailIdx: 0,
        elts: {},
        enqueue: (elt) => queue.elts[queue.tailIdx++] = elt,
        dequeue: () => {
            if (queue.headIdx == queue.tailIdx) {
                throw new Error("Queue is empty");
            }
            return queue.elts[queue.headIdx++];
        },
        size: () => queue.tailIdx - queue.headIdx,
        isEmpty: () => queue.tailIdx == queue.headIdx
    };
}

使用链表实现的队列比这种基于映射的方法更有效，使用循环缓冲区实现的队列比这种基于映射的方法更有效，但这两种数据结构的实现更复杂(特别是循环缓冲区数据结构)。

下面是我使用链表实现的堆栈和队列:

// Linked List function Node(data) { this.data = data; this.next = null; } // Stack implemented using LinkedList function Stack() { this.top = null; } Stack.prototype.push = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); newNode.next = this.top; //Special attention this.top = newNode; } Stack.prototype.pop = function() { if (this.top !== null) { var topItem = this.top.data; this.top = this.top.next; return topItem; } return null; } Stack.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.top; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } // var stack = new Stack(); // stack.push(3); // stack.push(5); // stack.push(7); // stack.print(); // Queue implemented using LinkedList function Queue() { this.head = null; this.tail = null; } Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) { var newNode = new Node(data); if (this.head === null) { this.head = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } else { this.tail.next = newNode; this.tail = newNode; } } Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() { var newNode; if (this.head !== null) { newNode = this.head.data; this.head = this.head.next; } return newNode; } Queue.prototype.print = function() { var curr = this.head; while (curr) { console.log(curr.data); curr = curr.next; } } var queue = new Queue(); queue.enqueue(3); queue.enqueue(5); queue.enqueue(7); queue.print(); queue.dequeue(); queue.dequeue(); queue.print();

在我看来，内建数组对于堆栈来说是很好的。如果你想在TypeScript中使用Queue，这里有一个实现

/**
 * A Typescript implementation of a queue.
 */
export default class Queue {

  private queue = [];
  private offset = 0;

  constructor(array = []) {
    // Init the queue using the contents of the array
    for (const item of array) {
      this.enqueue(item);
    }
  }

  /**
   * @returns {number} the length of the queue.
   */
  public getLength(): number {
    return (this.queue.length - this.offset);
  }

  /**
   * @returns {boolean} true if the queue is empty, and false otherwise.
   */
  public isEmpty(): boolean {
    return (this.queue.length === 0);
  }

  /**
   * Enqueues the specified item.
   *
   * @param item - the item to enqueue
   */
  public enqueue(item) {
    this.queue.push(item);
  }

  /**
   *  Dequeues an item and returns it. If the queue is empty, the value
   * {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public dequeue(): any {
    // if the queue is empty, return immediately
    if (this.queue.length === 0) {
      return null;
    }

    // store the item at the front of the queue
    const item = this.queue[this.offset];

    // increment the offset and remove the free space if necessary
    if (++this.offset * 2 >= this.queue.length) {
      this.queue = this.queue.slice(this.offset);
      this.offset = 0;
    }

    // return the dequeued item
    return item;
  };

  /**
   * Returns the item at the front of the queue (without dequeuing it).
   * If the queue is empty then {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public peek(): any {
    return (this.queue.length > 0 ? this.queue[this.offset] : null);
  }

}

这里有一个笑话测试

it('Queue', () => {
  const queue = new Queue();
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);
  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();

  queue.enqueue(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  queue.enqueue(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  queue.enqueue(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();
});

希望有人觉得这有用，

欢呼,

Stu