Create a pair of classes that provide the various methods that each of these data structures has (push, pop, peek, etc). Now implement the methods. If you're familiar with the concepts behind stack/queue, this should be pretty straightforward. You can implement the stack with an array, and a queue with a linked list, although there are certainly other ways to go about it. Javascript will make this easy, because it is weakly typed, so you don't even have to worry about generic types, which you'd have to do if you were implementing it in Java or C#.

下面是一个队列的链表版本，它也包括最后一个节点，这是@perkins建议的，也是最合适的。

// QUEUE Object Definition

var Queue = function() {
  this.first = null;
  this.last = null;
  this.size = 0;
};

var Node = function(data) {
  this.data = data;
  this.next = null;
};

Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(data) {
  var node = new Node(data);

  if (!this.first){ // for empty list first and last are the same
    this.first = node;
    this.last = node;
  } else { // otherwise we stick it on the end
    this.last.next=node;
    this.last=node;
  }

  this.size += 1;
  return node;
};

Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() {
  if (!this.first) //check for empty list
    return null;

  temp = this.first; // grab top of list
  if (this.first==this.last) {
    this.last=null;  // when we need to pop the last one
  }
  this.first = this.first.next; // move top of list down
  this.size -= 1;
  return temp;
};

Javascript有push和pop方法，它们操作在普通的Javascript数组对象上。

关于排队，请看这里:

http://safalra.com/web-design/javascript/queues/

Queues can be implemented in JavaScript using either the push and shift methods or unshift and pop methods of the array object. Although this is a simple way to implement queues, it is very inefficient for large queues — because of the methods operate on arrays, the shift and unshift methods move every element in the array each time they are called. Queue.js is a simple and efficient queue implementation for JavaScript whose dequeue function runs in amortized constant time. As a result, for larger queues, it can be significantly faster than using arrays.

数组是Javascript中的堆栈。只需使用arr.push(x)和y = arr.pop()。

下面是用Javascript实现队列的最简单方法，对于enqueue(x)和y = dequeue()，它的平摊时间都是O(1)。它使用从插入索引到元素的映射。

function newQueue() {
    return {
        headIdx: 0,
        tailIdx: 0,
        elts: {},
        enqueue: (elt) => queue.elts[queue.tailIdx++] = elt,
        dequeue: () => {
            if (queue.headIdx == queue.tailIdx) {
                throw new Error("Queue is empty");
            }
            return queue.elts[queue.headIdx++];
        },
        size: () => queue.tailIdx - queue.headIdx,
        isEmpty: () => queue.tailIdx == queue.headIdx
    };
}

使用链表实现的队列比这种基于映射的方法更有效，使用循环缓冲区实现的队列比这种基于映射的方法更有效，但这两种数据结构的实现更复杂(特别是循环缓冲区数据结构)。

我在实现BFS时遇到了这个线程。在疑惑为何表现如此糟糕之后，我做了一些调查。array.shift()通常在O(n)中运行，这将我的BFS运行时从O(V+E)增加到O(V^2+E)。

我没有从头开始实现一个队列，而是使用了npm包双端队列，它与之前使用的数组方法兼容，工作起来很有魅力。 deque可以用作堆栈或队列。

    //import package
    import Deque from 'double-ended-queue';

    //create queue
    let queue = new Deque();
    //append
    queue.push(item);
    //dequeue (get first item inserted)
    let firstItem = queue.shift();

    //pop (get last item inserted)
    let lastItem = queue.pop();

Javascript数组shift()很慢，特别是当包含很多元素时。我知道两种方法来实现平摊O(1)复杂度的队列。

首先是使用循环缓冲区和表加倍。我以前实现过这个。你可以在这里看到我的源代码 https://github.com/kevyuu/rapid-queue

第二种方法是使用两个堆栈。这是带有两个堆栈的队列的代码

function createDoubleStackQueue() {
var that = {};
var pushContainer = [];
var popContainer = [];

function moveElementToPopContainer() {
    while (pushContainer.length !==0 ) {
        var element = pushContainer.pop();
        popContainer.push(element);
    }
}

that.push = function(element) {
    pushContainer.push(element);
};

that.shift = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    } else {
        return popContainer.pop();
    }
};

that.front = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return popContainer[popContainer.length - 1];
};

that.length = function() {
    return pushContainer.length + popContainer.length;
};

that.isEmpty = function() {
    return (pushContainer.length + popContainer.length) === 0;
};

return that;}

这是使用jsPerf进行的性能比较

CircularQueue.shift() vs Array.shift()

http://jsperf.com/rapidqueue-shift-vs-array-shift

正如你所看到的，大数据集的速度要快得多