在我看来，内建数组对于堆栈来说是很好的。如果你想在TypeScript中使用Queue，这里有一个实现

/**
 * A Typescript implementation of a queue.
 */
export default class Queue {

  private queue = [];
  private offset = 0;

  constructor(array = []) {
    // Init the queue using the contents of the array
    for (const item of array) {
      this.enqueue(item);
    }
  }

  /**
   * @returns {number} the length of the queue.
   */
  public getLength(): number {
    return (this.queue.length - this.offset);
  }

  /**
   * @returns {boolean} true if the queue is empty, and false otherwise.
   */
  public isEmpty(): boolean {
    return (this.queue.length === 0);
  }

  /**
   * Enqueues the specified item.
   *
   * @param item - the item to enqueue
   */
  public enqueue(item) {
    this.queue.push(item);
  }

  /**
   *  Dequeues an item and returns it. If the queue is empty, the value
   * {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public dequeue(): any {
    // if the queue is empty, return immediately
    if (this.queue.length === 0) {
      return null;
    }

    // store the item at the front of the queue
    const item = this.queue[this.offset];

    // increment the offset and remove the free space if necessary
    if (++this.offset * 2 >= this.queue.length) {
      this.queue = this.queue.slice(this.offset);
      this.offset = 0;
    }

    // return the dequeued item
    return item;
  };

  /**
   * Returns the item at the front of the queue (without dequeuing it).
   * If the queue is empty then {@code null} is returned.
   *
   * @returns {any}
   */
  public peek(): any {
    return (this.queue.length > 0 ? this.queue[this.offset] : null);
  }

}

这里有一个笑话测试

it('Queue', () => {
  const queue = new Queue();
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);
  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();

  queue.enqueue(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  queue.enqueue(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  queue.enqueue(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(2);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(1);
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBe(3);
  expect(queue.getLength()).toBe(0);

  expect(queue.peek()).toBeNull();
  expect(queue.dequeue()).toBeNull();
});

希望有人觉得这有用，

欢呼,

Stu

这是我的实现堆栈。

function Stack() {
this.dataStore = [];
this.top = 0;
this.push = push;
this.pop = pop;
this.peek = peek;
this.clear = clear;
this.length = length;
}
function push(element) {
this.dataStore[this.top++] = element;
}
function peek() {
return this.dataStore[this.top-1];
}
function pop() {
return this.dataStore[--this.top];
}
function clear() {
this.top = 0;
}
function length() {
return this.top;
}

var s = new Stack();
s.push("David");
s.push("Raymond");
s.push("Bryan");
console.log("length: " + s.length());
console.log(s.peek());

var stack = [];
stack.push(2);       // stack is now [2]
stack.push(5);       // stack is now [2, 5]
var i = stack.pop(); // stack is now [2]
alert(i);            // displays 5

var queue = [];
queue.push(2);         // queue is now [2]
queue.push(5);         // queue is now [2, 5]
var i = queue.shift(); // queue is now [5]
alert(i);              // displays 2

摘自“9个你可能不知道的JavaScript技巧”

单端队列

这是一个使用映射的队列。由于插入顺序得到了保证，所以可以像迭代数组一样迭代它。除此之外，它的思想与Queue.js非常相似。

我做了一些简单的测试，但还没有进行广泛的测试。我还添加了一些我认为很好的功能(通过数组构造)或易于实现(例如last()和first())。

它背后的简单版本/直觉如下:

class Queue {
    constructor() {
        this.offset = 0
        this.data = new Map()
    }

    enqueue(item) {
        const current = this.offset + this.length()
        this.data.set(current, item)
    }

    dequeue() {
        if (this.length() > 0) {
            this.data.delete(this.offset)
            this.offset += 1
        }
    }

    first() {
        return this.data.get(this.offset)
    }

    last() {
        return this.data.get(this.offset + this.length() - 1)
    }

    length() {
        return this.data.size
    }
}

简单版本的问题是，当内存索引超过9千万亿(Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER的值)时，需要重新映射内存。此外，我认为它可能很好有数组构造，它很高兴看到值正在进入队列和退出队列返回。可以通过编写以下代码来解释这一点:

class Queue {
    constructor() {
        this.offset = 0
        this.data = new Map()
        if (arguments.length === 1) this._initializeFromArray(arguments[0])
    }

    enqueue(item) {
        const current = this.offset + this.length()
        this.data.set(current, item)
        let result = this.data.get(current)
        this._remapDataIfMaxMemoryViolation(current, Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER)
        return result
    }

    dequeue() {
        let result = undefined
        if (this.length() > 0) {
            result = this.data.get(this.offset)
            this.data.delete(this.offset)
            this.offset += 1
        }
        if (this.length() === 0) this.offset = 0
        return result
    }

    first() {
        return this.data.get(this.offset)
    }

    last() {
        return this.data.get(this.offset + this.length() - 1)
    }

    length() {
        return this.data.size
    }

    _remapDataIfMaxMemoryViolation(current, threshhold) {
        if (current+1 === threshhold) {
            const length = this.length()
            this.offset = 0
            for (const [key, value] of this.data) {
                this.data.set(this.offset, value)
                this.data.delete(key, value)
                this.offset += 1
                if (this.offset === length) break
            }       
        }
    }

    _initializeFromArray(array) {
        for (const value of array) {
            this.data.set(this.offset, value)
            this.offset += 1
        }
    }
}

我在Chrome开发控制台进行了一些测试，对完整版本进行了以下调用。

l = console.log // I'm lazy with typing
q = new Queue()
l('enqueue', q.enqueue(1))
l('enqueue', q.enqueue(2))
l('enqueue', q.enqueue(3))
l('enqueue', q.enqueue("hello"))
l('enqueue', q.enqueue("monkey"))
l('show 5 elements: ', q.data)
l('length', q.length())
l('first', q.first())
l('last', q.last())
l('dequeue', q.dequeue())
l('dequeue', q.dequeue())
l('show 3 elements', q.data)
q._remapDataIfMaxMemoryViolation(q.length()+q.offset-1, 5)
l('show 3 remapped elements', q.data)

l(queue = new Queue([3,4,5,6,7,8,9]))
l(queue.data)

Javascript数组shift()很慢，特别是当包含很多元素时。我知道两种方法来实现平摊O(1)复杂度的队列。

首先是使用循环缓冲区和表加倍。我以前实现过这个。你可以在这里看到我的源代码 https://github.com/kevyuu/rapid-queue

第二种方法是使用两个堆栈。这是带有两个堆栈的队列的代码

function createDoubleStackQueue() {
var that = {};
var pushContainer = [];
var popContainer = [];

function moveElementToPopContainer() {
    while (pushContainer.length !==0 ) {
        var element = pushContainer.pop();
        popContainer.push(element);
    }
}

that.push = function(element) {
    pushContainer.push(element);
};

that.shift = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    } else {
        return popContainer.pop();
    }
};

that.front = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return popContainer[popContainer.length - 1];
};

that.length = function() {
    return pushContainer.length + popContainer.length;
};

that.isEmpty = function() {
    return (pushContainer.length + popContainer.length) === 0;
};

return that;}

这是使用jsPerf进行的性能比较

CircularQueue.shift() vs Array.shift()

http://jsperf.com/rapidqueue-shift-vs-array-shift

正如你所看到的，大数据集的速度要快得多

数组。

栈:

var stack = [];

//put value on top of stack
stack.push(1);

//remove value from top of stack
var value = stack.pop();

队列:

var queue = [];

//put value on end of queue
queue.push(1);

//Take first value from queue
var value = queue.shift();