As many have said: native array using push and pop is fine for a stack, but using shift for taking elements from a queue means that the remaining elements need to move, which is potentially slow. The idea of using two stacks to make a queue in kevinyu's answer is a nice idea to fix it, and of course that can be done with native-array-stacks as well. (Edit: there was actually already an answer by Yuki-Dreamer that does this, albeit less compactly. I didn't notice it until now because it was unfairly downvoted.)

下面是一个使用ES5/ES6特性的紧凑实现，它使队列对象的行为尽可能接近本机的push/shift变体，除了每次操作花费O(1)平摊时间:

const queue = () => {
    const a = [], b = [];
    return {
        push: (...elts) => a.push(...elts),
        shift: () => {
            if (b.length === 0) {
                while (a.length > 0) { b.push(a.pop()) }
            }
            return b.pop();
        },
        get length() { return a.length + b.length }
    }
}

现在你可以做:

const q = queue();
q.push(8);
q.push(9);
q.push(10);
console.log(q.length);          // outputs 3
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 8
q.push(11);
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 9
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 10
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs 11
console.log(q.shift());         // outputs undefined

队列实现对长度使用getter语法，使其看起来像一个属性，并对push使用rest参数语法，以允许一次推送多个内容。如果你不想这样做，你可以用push: elt => a.push(elt)，替换第4行。(但是请注意，你不能用push: a.push替换它，就像我自己第一次尝试的那样，结果非常奇怪:这是因为它导致本机push方法被调用，并设置为队列对象。)

你可以基于这个概念使用你自己的自定义类，这里是你可以用来做这些事情的代码片段

/*
*   Stack implementation in JavaScript
*/



function Stack() {
  this.top = null;
  this.count = 0;

  this.getCount = function() {
    return this.count;
  }

  this.getTop = function() {
    return this.top;
  }

  this.push = function(data) {
    var node = {
      data: data,
      next: null
    }

    node.next = this.top;
    this.top = node;

    this.count++;
  }

  this.peek = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      return this.top.data;
    }
  }

  this.pop = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var out = this.top;
      this.top = this.top.next;
      if (this.count > 0) {
        this.count--;
      }

      return out.data;
    }
  }

  this.displayAll = function() {
    if (this.top === null) {
      return null;
    } else {
      var arr = new Array();

      var current = this.top;
      //console.log(current);
      for (var i = 0; i < this.count; i++) {
        arr[i] = current.data;
        current = current.next;
      }

      return arr;
    }
  }
}

要检查这一点，请使用控制台，并逐一尝试这些行。

>> var st = new Stack();

>> st.push("BP");

>> st.push("NK");

>> st.getTop();

>> st.getCount();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.pop();

>> st.displayAll();

>> st.getTop();

>> st.peek();

Javascript数组shift()很慢，特别是当包含很多元素时。我知道两种方法来实现平摊O(1)复杂度的队列。

首先是使用循环缓冲区和表加倍。我以前实现过这个。你可以在这里看到我的源代码 https://github.com/kevyuu/rapid-queue

第二种方法是使用两个堆栈。这是带有两个堆栈的队列的代码

function createDoubleStackQueue() {
var that = {};
var pushContainer = [];
var popContainer = [];

function moveElementToPopContainer() {
    while (pushContainer.length !==0 ) {
        var element = pushContainer.pop();
        popContainer.push(element);
    }
}

that.push = function(element) {
    pushContainer.push(element);
};

that.shift = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    } else {
        return popContainer.pop();
    }
};

that.front = function() {
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        moveElementToPopContainer();
    }
    if (popContainer.length === 0) {
        return null;
    }
    return popContainer[popContainer.length - 1];
};

that.length = function() {
    return pushContainer.length + popContainer.length;
};

that.isEmpty = function() {
    return (pushContainer.length + popContainer.length) === 0;
};

return that;}

这是使用jsPerf进行的性能比较

CircularQueue.shift() vs Array.shift()

http://jsperf.com/rapidqueue-shift-vs-array-shift

正如你所看到的，大数据集的速度要快得多

你可以使用WeakMaps来实现ES6类中的私有属性，以及JavaScript语言中String属性和方法的好处，如下所示:

const _items = new WeakMap();

class Stack {
  constructor() {
    _items.set(this, []);
  }

push(obj) {
  _items.get(this).push(obj);
}

pop() {
  const L = _items.get(this).length;
  if(L===0)
    throw new Error('Stack is empty');
  return _items.get(this).pop();
}

peek() {
  const items = _items.get(this);
  if(items.length === 0)
    throw new Error ('Stack is empty');
  return items[items.length-1];
}

get count() {
  return _items.get(this).length;
}
}

const stack = new Stack();

//now in console:
//stack.push('a')
//stack.push(1)
//stack.count   => 2
//stack.peek()  => 1
//stack.pop()   => 1
//stack.pop()   => "a"
//stack.count   => 0
//stack.pop()   => Error Stack is empty

下面是一个相当简单的队列实现，有两个目标:

与array.shift()不同，您知道这个出队列方法需要常数时间(O(1))。 为了提高速度，这种方法使用的分配比链表方法少得多。

堆栈实现只共享第二个目标。

// Queue
function Queue() {
        this.q = new Array(5);
        this.first = 0;
        this.size = 0;
}
Queue.prototype.enqueue = function(a) {
        var other;
        if (this.size == this.q.length) {
                other = new Array(this.size*2);
                for (var i = 0; i < this.size; i++) {
                        other[i] = this.q[(this.first+i)%this.size];
                }
                this.first = 0;
                this.q = other;
        }
        this.q[(this.first+this.size)%this.q.length] = a;
        this.size++;
};
Queue.prototype.dequeue = function() {
        if (this.size == 0) return undefined;
        this.size--;
        var ret = this.q[this.first];
        this.first = (this.first+1)%this.q.length;
        return ret;
};
Queue.prototype.peek = function() { return this.size > 0 ? this.q[this.first] : undefined; };
Queue.prototype.isEmpty = function() { return this.size == 0; };

// Stack
function Stack() {
        this.s = new Array(5);
        this.size = 0;
}
Stack.prototype.push = function(a) {
        var other;
    if (this.size == this.s.length) {
            other = new Array(this.s.length*2);
            for (var i = 0; i < this.s.length; i++) other[i] = this.s[i];
            this.s = other;
    }
    this.s[this.size++] = a;
};
Stack.prototype.pop = function() {
        if (this.size == 0) return undefined;
        return this.s[--this.size];
};
Stack.prototype.peek = function() { return this.size > 0 ? this.s[this.size-1] : undefined; };

没有数组(年代)

//Javascript stack linked list data structure (no array)

function node(value, noderef) {
    this.value = value;
    this.next = noderef;
}
function stack() {
    this.push = function (value) {
        this.next = this.first;
        this.first = new node(value, this.next);
    }
    this.pop = function () {
        var popvalue = this.first.value;
        this.first = this.first.next;
        return popvalue;
    }
    this.hasnext = function () {
        return this.next != undefined;
    }
    this.isempty = function () {
        return this.first == undefined;
    }

}

//Javascript stack linked list data structure (no array)
function node(value, noderef) {
    this.value = value;
    this.next = undefined;
}
function queue() {
    this.enqueue = function (value) {
        this.oldlast = this.last;
        this.last = new node(value);
        if (this.isempty())
            this.first = this.last;
        else 
           this.oldlast.next = this.last;
    }
    this.dequeue = function () {
        var queuvalue = this.first.value;
        this.first = this.first.next;
        return queuvalue;
    }
    this.hasnext = function () {
        return this.first.next != undefined;
    }
    this.isempty = function () {
        return this.first == undefined;
    }

}