在之前工作的基础上，我考虑用三种方式增强重试逻辑:

Specifying what exception type to catch/retry. This is the primary enhacement as retrying for any exception is just plain wrong. Not nesting the last try in a try/catch, achieving slightly better performance Making it an Action extension method static class ActionExtensions { public static void InvokeAndRetryOnException<T> (this Action action, int retries, TimeSpan retryDelay) where T : Exception { if (action == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("action"); while( retries-- > 0 ) { try { action( ); return; } catch (T) { Thread.Sleep( retryDelay ); } } action( ); } }

然后可以像这样调用方法(当然也可以使用匿名方法):

new Action( AMethodThatMightThrowIntermittentException )
  .InvokeAndRetryOnException<IntermittentException>( 2, TimeSpan.FromSeconds( 1 ) );

此方法允许对某些异常类型进行重试(立即抛出其他异常类型)。

public static void DoRetry(
    List<Type> retryOnExceptionTypes,
    Action actionToTry,
    int retryCount = 5,
    int msWaitBeforeEachRety = 300)
{
    for (var i = 0; i < retryCount; ++i)
    {
        try
        {
            actionToTry();
            break;
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {
            // Retries exceeded
            // Throws on last iteration of loop
            if (i == retryCount - 1) throw;

            // Is type retryable?
            var exceptionType = ex.GetType();
            if (!retryOnExceptionTypes.Contains(exceptionType))
            {
                throw;
            }

            // Wait before retry
            Thread.Sleep(msWaitBeforeEachRety);
        }
    }
}
public static void DoRetry(
    Type retryOnExceptionType,
    Action actionToTry,
    int retryCount = 5,
    int msWaitBeforeEachRety = 300)
        => DoRetry(new List<Type> {retryOnExceptionType}, actionToTry, retryCount, msWaitBeforeEachRety);

使用示例:

DoRetry(typeof(IOException), () => {
    using (var fs = new FileStream(requestedFilePath, FileMode.Create, FileAccess.Write))
    {
        fs.Write(entryBytes, 0, entryBytes.Length);
    }
});

您还可以考虑添加要重试的异常类型。例如，这是您想要重试的超时异常吗?数据库异常?

RetryForExcpetionType(DoSomething, typeof(TimeoutException), 5, 1000);

public static void RetryForExcpetionType(Action action, Type retryOnExceptionType, int numRetries, int retryTimeout)
{
    if (action == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("action");
    if (retryOnExceptionType == null)
        throw new ArgumentNullException("retryOnExceptionType");
    while (true)
    {
        try
        {
            action();
            return;
        }
        catch(Exception e)
        {
            if (--numRetries <= 0 || !retryOnExceptionType.IsAssignableFrom(e.GetType()))
                throw;

            if (retryTimeout > 0)
                System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(retryTimeout);
        }
    }
}

您可能还注意到，所有其他示例在测试retries == 0时都存在类似的问题，要么重试无穷大，要么在给定负值时无法引发异常。Sleep(-1000)在上面的catch块中也会失败。这取决于你期望人们有多“愚蠢”，但防御性编程永远不会伤害到你。

允许函数和重试消息

public static T RetryMethod<T>(Func<T> method, int numRetries, int retryTimeout, Action onFailureAction)
{
 Guard.IsNotNull(method, "method");            
 T retval = default(T);
 do
 {
   try
   {
     retval = method();
     return retval;
   }
   catch
   {
     onFailureAction();
      if (numRetries <= 0) throw; // improved to avoid silent failure
      Thread.Sleep(retryTimeout);
   }
} while (numRetries-- > 0);
  return retval;
}

如果将简单地重试同一个调用的通用catch语句用作通用异常处理机制，则可能是危险的。话虽如此，这里有一个基于lambda的重试包装器，您可以将其用于任何方法。为了获得更大的灵活性，我选择将重试次数和重试超时作为参数:

public static class Retry
{
    public static void Do(
        Action action,
        TimeSpan retryInterval,
        int maxAttemptCount = 3)
    {
        Do<object>(() =>
        {
            action();
            return null;
        }, retryInterval, maxAttemptCount);
    }

    public static T Do<T>(
        Func<T> action,
        TimeSpan retryInterval,
        int maxAttemptCount = 3)
    {
        var exceptions = new List<Exception>();

        for (int attempted = 0; attempted < maxAttemptCount; attempted++)
        {
            try
            {
                if (attempted > 0)
                {
                    Thread.Sleep(retryInterval);
                }
                return action();
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                exceptions.Add(ex);
            }
        }
        throw new AggregateException(exceptions);
    }
}

你现在可以使用这个实用程序方法来执行重试逻辑:

Retry.Do(() => SomeFunctionThatCanFail(), TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));

or:

Retry.Do(SomeFunctionThatCanFail, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1));

or:

int result = Retry.Do(SomeFunctionWhichReturnsInt, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(1), 4);

或者你甚至可以做一个异步重载。

我已经实现了一个异步版本的接受的答案，就像这样-它似乎工作得很好-有评论吗?

        public static async Task DoAsync(
            Action action,
            TimeSpan retryInterval,
            int maxAttemptCount = 3)
        {
            DoAsync<object>(() =>
            {
                action();
                return null;
            }, retryInterval, maxAttemptCount);
        }

        public static async Task<T> DoAsync<T>(
            Func<Task<T>> action,
            TimeSpan retryInterval,
            int maxAttemptCount = 3)
        {
            var exceptions = new List<Exception>();

            for (int attempted = 0; attempted < maxAttemptCount; attempted++)
            {
                try
                {
                    if (attempted > 0)
                    {
                        Thread.Sleep(retryInterval);
                    }
                    return await action();
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                    exceptions.Add(ex);
                }
            }
            throw new AggregateException(exceptions);
        }

并且，简单地像这样称呼它:

var result = await Retry.DoAsync(() => MyAsyncMethod(), TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5), 4);