我有两本字典，但为了简化起见，我就选这两本:
>>> x = dict(a=1, b=2)
>>> y = dict(a=2, b=2)
现在，我想比较x中的每个键值对在y中是否有相同的对应值，所以我这样写:
>>> for x_values, y_values in zip(x.iteritems(), y.iteritems()):
if x_values == y_values:
print 'Ok', x_values, y_values
else:
print 'Not', x_values, y_values
它的工作原理是返回一个元组，然后比较是否相等。
我的问题:
这对吗?还有更好的办法吗?最好不是在速度上，我说的是代码优雅。
更新:我忘了提到，我必须检查有多少键，值对是相等的。
当前回答
测试两个字典的键和值是否相等:
def dicts_equal(d1,d2):
""" return True if all keys and values are the same """
return all(k in d2 and d1[k] == d2[k]
for k in d1) \
and all(k in d1 and d1[k] == d2[k]
for k in d2)
如果你想返回不同的值，请以不同的方式书写:
def dict1_minus_d2(d1, d2):
""" return the subset of d1 where the keys don't exist in d2 or
the values in d2 are different, as a dict """
return {k,v for k,v in d1.items() if k in d2 and v == d2[k]}
你必须调用它两次，即
dict1_minus_d2(d1,d2).extend(dict1_minus_d2(d2,d1))
其他回答
@mouad的答案很好，如果你假设两个字典都只包含简单的值。然而，如果你有包含字典的字典，你会得到一个异常，因为字典是不可哈希的。
在我的脑海中，这样做可能有用:
def compare_dictionaries(dict1, dict2):
if dict1 is None or dict2 is None:
print('Nones')
return False
if (not isinstance(dict1, dict)) or (not isinstance(dict2, dict)):
print('Not dict')
return False
shared_keys = set(dict1.keys()) & set(dict2.keys())
if not ( len(shared_keys) == len(dict1.keys()) and len(shared_keys) == len(dict2.keys())):
print('Not all keys are shared')
return False
dicts_are_equal = True
for key in dict1.keys():
if isinstance(dict1[key], dict) or isinstance(dict2[key], dict):
dicts_are_equal = dicts_are_equal and compare_dictionaries(dict1[key], dict2[key])
else:
dicts_are_equal = dicts_are_equal and all(atleast_1d(dict1[key] == dict2[key]))
return dicts_are_equal
>>> hash_1
{'a': 'foo', 'b': 'bar'}
>>> hash_2
{'a': 'foo', 'b': 'bar'}
>>> set_1 = set (hash_1.iteritems())
>>> set_1
set([('a', 'foo'), ('b', 'bar')])
>>> set_2 = set (hash_2.iteritems())
>>> set_2
set([('a', 'foo'), ('b', 'bar')])
>>> len (set_1.difference(set_2))
0
>>> if (len(set_1.difference(set_2)) | len(set_2.difference(set_1))) == False:
... print "The two hashes match."
...
The two hashes match.
>>> hash_2['c'] = 'baz'
>>> hash_2
{'a': 'foo', 'c': 'baz', 'b': 'bar'}
>>> if (len(set_1.difference(set_2)) | len(set_2.difference(set_1))) == False:
... print "The two hashes match."
...
>>>
>>> hash_2.pop('c')
'baz'
这是另一个选择:
>>> id(hash_1)
140640738806240
>>> id(hash_2)
140640738994848
所以你可以看到这两个id是不同的。但是丰富的比较操作符似乎可以做到这一点:
>>> hash_1 == hash_2
True
>>>
>>> hash_2
{'a': 'foo', 'b': 'bar'}
>>> set_2 = set (hash_2.iteritems())
>>> if (len(set_1.difference(set_2)) | len(set_2.difference(set_1))) == False:
... print "The two hashes match."
...
The two hashes match.
>>>
在Python 3.6中，可以这样做:-
if (len(dict_1)==len(dict_2):
for i in dict_1.items():
ret=bool(i in dict_2.items())
如果dict_1中的所有项都出现在dict_2中，Ret变量将为真
在PyUnit中有一个比较字典的方法。我使用以下两个字典对它进行了测试，它完全符合您的要求。
d1 = {1: "value1",
2: [{"subKey1":"subValue1",
"subKey2":"subValue2"}]}
d2 = {1: "value1",
2: [{"subKey2":"subValue2",
"subKey1": "subValue1"}]
}
def assertDictEqual(self, d1, d2, msg=None):
self.assertIsInstance(d1, dict, 'First argument is not a dictionary')
self.assertIsInstance(d2, dict, 'Second argument is not a dictionary')
if d1 != d2:
standardMsg = '%s != %s' % (safe_repr(d1, True), safe_repr(d2, True))
diff = ('\n' + '\n'.join(difflib.ndiff(
pprint.pformat(d1).splitlines(),
pprint.pformat(d2).splitlines())))
standardMsg = self._truncateMessage(standardMsg, diff)
self.fail(self._formatMessage(msg, standardMsg))
我不建议在生产代码中导入unittest。我的想法是，PyUnit中的源代码可以重新配置，以在生产环境中运行。它使用pprint来“漂亮地打印”字典。调整这段代码以使其“适合生产”似乎很容易。
def dict_compare(d1, d2):
d1_keys = set(d1.keys())
d2_keys = set(d2.keys())
shared_keys = d1_keys.intersection(d2_keys)
added = d1_keys - d2_keys
removed = d2_keys - d1_keys
modified = {o : (d1[o], d2[o]) for o in shared_keys if d1[o] != d2[o]}
same = set(o for o in shared_keys if d1[o] == d2[o])
return added, removed, modified, same
x = dict(a=1, b=2)
y = dict(a=2, b=2)
added, removed, modified, same = dict_compare(x, y)
