值得注意的是，Zod模式在默认情况下会删除未知属性。如果您已经在使用Zod，那么它很可能适合您的开发过程。

https://github.com/colinhacks/zod

import { z } from "zod";

// muppet schema
const muppet = z.object({
  color: z.string(),
  annoying: z.boolean(),
  height: z.string(),
  meta: z.object({ one: z.string(), two: z.string() }),
});

// TypeScript type if you want it
type TMuppet = z.infer<typeof muppet>;

// elmo example
const elmo: TMuppet = {
  color: "red",
  annoying: true,
  height: "unknown",
  meta: { one: "1", two: "2" },
};

// get a subset of the schema (another schema) if you want
const subset = muppet.pick({ color: true, height: true });

// parsing removes unknown properties by default
subset.parse(elmo); // { color: 'red', height: 'unknown' }

虽然它有点啰嗦，但通过使用Array.prototype.reduce，你可以完成其他人在2年前推荐的underscore/lodash。

var subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce(function(o, k) { o[k] = elmo[k]; return o; }, {});

这种方法从另一方面解决了这个问题:而不是获取一个对象并将属性名传递给它来提取，而是获取一个属性名数组并将它们简化为一个新对象。

While it's more verbose in the simplest case, a callback here is pretty handy, since you can easily meet some common requirements, e.g. change the 'color' property to 'colour' on the new object, flatten arrays, etc. -- any of the things you need to do when receiving an object from one service/library and building a new object needed somewhere else. While underscore/lodash are excellent, well-implemented libs, this is my preferred approach for less vendor-reliance, and a simpler, more consistent approach when my subset-building logic gets more complex.

编辑:es7版本相同:

const subset = ['color', 'height'].reduce((a, e) => (a[e] = elmo[e], a), {});

编辑:这也是咖喱的一个很好的例子!让'pick'函数返回另一个函数。

const pick = (...props) => o => props.reduce((a, e) => ({ ...a, [e]: o[e] }), {});

上面的方法非常接近于另一种方法，除了它让你在运行中构建一个“picker”。如。

pick('color', 'height')(elmo);

这种方法的特别之处在于，你可以很容易地将所选的“picks”传递到任何带有函数的对象中，例如Array#map:

[elmo, grover, bigBird].map(pick('color', 'height'));
// [
//   { color: 'red', height: 'short' },
//   { color: 'blue', height: 'medium' },
//   { color: 'yellow', height: 'tall' },
// ]

对象数组

const aListOfObjects = [{
    prop1: 50,
    prop2: "Nothing",
    prop3: "hello",
    prop4: "What's up",
  },
  {
    prop1: 88,
    prop2: "Whatever",
    prop3: "world",
    prop4: "You get it",
  },
]

创建一个或多个对象的子集可以通过这种方式解构对象来实现。

const sections = aListOfObjects.map(({prop1, prop2}) => ({prop1, prop2}));

我发现最简单的方法，它不会创建不必要的变量，是一个函数，你可以调用，工作原理与lodash相同，如下所示:

pick(obj, keys){
    return  Object.assign({}, ...keys.map(key => ({ [key]: obj[key] })))
}

例如:

pick(obj, keys){
    return  Object.assign({}, ...keys.map(key => ({ [key]: obj[key] })))
}
const obj = {a:1, b:2, c:3, d:4}
const keys = ['a', 'c', 'f']
const picked = pick(obj,keys)
console.log(picked)

Pick = (obj, keys) => { 返回对象。分配({},…键。Map (key => ({ (例子):obj(例子) }))) ｝ Const obj = { 答:1, b: 2 c: 3, d: 4 ｝ Const keys = ['a'， 'c'， 'f'] Const selected = pick(obj, keys) console.log(选)

核心库中没有这样的内置功能，但你可以使用对象解构来实现它…

const {color, height} = sourceObject;
const newObject = {color, height};

你也可以写一个效用函数…

const cloneAndPluck = function(sourceObject, keys) {
    const newObject = {};
    keys.forEach((obj, key) => { newObject[key] = sourceObject[key]; });
    return newObject;
};

const subset = cloneAndPluck(elmo, ["color", "height"]);

像Lodash这样的库也有_.pick()。

打印稿的解决方案:

function pick<T extends object, U extends keyof T>(
  obj: T,
  paths: Array<U>
): Pick<T, U> {
  const ret = Object.create(null);
  for (const k of paths) {
    ret[k] = obj[k];
  }
  return ret;
}

输入信息甚至允许自动补全:

Credit to definitelytyping for U extends keyof T trick!

打印稿操场