请注意，如果您希望每天有10万用户，并且一次活跃数小时(意味着最多有2万+并发用户)，那么您将需要大量的服务器。SO有大约1.5万名注册用户，其中大多数人可能不是每天都活跃。虽然大部分流量来自未注册用户，但我猜他们中很少有人在网站上停留超过几分钟(即他们关注谷歌搜索结果后离开)。

对于这样的容量，预计至少需要30台服务器……这仍然是相当沉重的，每台服务器有1000个并发用户。

"What are the largest sites built on Django today?" There isn't any single place that collects information about traffic on Django built sites, so I'll have to take a stab at it using data from various locations. First, we have a list of Django sites on the front page of the main Django project page and then a list of Django built sites at djangosites.org. Going through the lists and picking some that I know have decent traffic we see: Instagram: What Powers Instagram: Hundreds of Instances, Dozens of Technologies. Pinterest: Alexa rank 37 (21.4.2015) and 70 Million users in 2013 Bitbucket: 200TB of Code and 2.500.000 Users Disqus: Serving 400 million people with Python. curse.com: 600k daily visits. tabblo.com: 44k daily visits, see Ned Batchelder's posts Infrastructure for modern web sites. chesspark.com: Alexa rank about 179k. pownce.com (no longer active): alexa rank about 65k. Mike Malone of Pownce, in his EuroDjangoCon presentation on Scaling Django Web Apps says "hundreds of hits per second". This is a very good presentation on how to scale Django, and makes some good points including (current) shortcomings in Django scalability. HP had a site built with Django 1.5: ePrint center. However, as for novemer/2015 the entire website was migrated and this link is just a redirect. This website was a world-wide service attending subscription to Instant Ink and related services HP offered (*). "Can Django deal with 100,000 users daily, each visiting the site for a couple of hours?" Yes, see above. "Could a site like Stack Overflow run on Django?" My gut feeling is yes but, as others answered and Mike Malone mentions in his presentation, database design is critical. Strong proof might also be found at www.cnprog.com if we can find any reliable traffic stats. Anyway, it's not just something that will happen by throwing together a bunch of Django models :)

当然，还有更多感兴趣的网站和博主，但我必须在某个地方停下来!

一篇关于使用Django构建高流量网站michaelmoore.com的博文，将其描述为排名前10,000的网站。Quantcast数据和compete.com数据。

(*)编辑的作者，包括这些引用，曾经在该项目中作为外包开发人员工作。

目前在Django上构建的“最大”站点是什么?(我主要通过用户流量来衡量规模) Pinterest disqus.com 更多信息请点击:https://www.shuup.com/en/blog/25-of-the-most-popular-python-and-django-websites/

Django能每天处理10万名用户，每个用户访问站点几个小时吗? 是的，但是要使用正确的架构，数据库设计，使用缓存，使用负载平衡和多个服务器或节点

像Stack Overflow这样的站点可以在Django上运行吗? 是的，只需要按照第二个问题中提到的答案

我使用Django的经验很少，但我记得在Django书中有一章他们采访了运行一些大型Django应用程序的人。这里有一个链接。我想这能提供一些启示。

它说curse.com是最大的Django应用程序之一，每月有6000万到9000万的页面浏览量。

我有点唱反调:

你应该看看calhenderson在Django con 2008的主题演讲，标题是“为什么我讨厌Django”，他在演讲中详细介绍了Django在高流量网站中所缺少的所有功能。最后，你必须以开放的心态看待这一切，因为编写可伸缩的Django应用程序是完全可能的，但我认为这是一个很好的演示，与你的问题相关。

如果你想使用开源，那么你有很多选择。但是python是其中最好的，因为它有很多库和一个超级棒的社区。 下面这些原因可能会改变你的想法:

Python is very good but it is a interpreted language which makes it slow. But many accelerator and caching services are there which partly solve this problem. If you are thinking about rapid development then Ruby on Rails is best among all. The main motto of this(ROR) framework is to give a comfortable experience to the developers. If you compare Ruby and Python both have nearly the same syntax. Google App Engine is very good service but it will bind you in its scope, you don't get chance to experiment new things. Instead of it you can use Digital Ocean cloud which will only take $5/Month charge for its simplest droplet. Heroku is another free service where you can deploy your product. Yes! Yes! What you heard is totally correct but here are some examples which are using other technologies Rails: Github, Twitter(previously), Shopify, Airbnb, Slideshare, Heroku etc. PHP: Facebook, Wikipedia, Flickr, Yahoo, Tumbler, Mailchimp etc.

结论是一个框架或语言不会为你做所有的事情。一个更好的架构，设计和策略会给你一个可扩展的网站。Instagram是最大的例子，这个小团队管理着如此庞大的数据。这里有一个关于它的架构的博客，一定要读。