严格相等运算符将告诉您两个对象类型是否相等。然而,是否有一种方法来判断两个对象是否相等,就像Java中的哈希码值一样?

堆栈溢出问题JavaScript中有hashCode函数吗?类似于这个问题,但需要一个更学术的答案。上面的场景说明了为什么有必要有一个,我想知道是否有等效的解决方案。


当前回答

简短的回答

简单的答案是:不,没有一般的方法来确定一个对象等于另一个你所指的意义。例外情况是当您严格地认为一个对象是无类型的。

长话短说

这个概念是一个Equals方法,它比较一个对象的两个不同实例,以指示它们在值级别上是否相等。但是,定义Equals方法应该如何实现取决于具体的类型。对具有基本值的属性进行迭代比较可能还不够:对象可能包含与相等无关的属性。例如,

 function MyClass(a, b)
 {
     var c;
     this.getCLazy = function() {
         if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
         return c;
     }
  }

在上面的例子中,c对于确定MyClass的任何两个实例是否相等并不重要,只有a和b是重要的。在某些情况下,c可能在不同实例之间有所不同,但在比较中并不显著。

注意,当成员本身也可能是某个类型的实例,并且每个实例都需要有确定相等的方法时,这个问题就会出现。

更复杂的是,在JavaScript中,数据和方法之间的区别是模糊的。

一个对象可以引用一个作为事件处理程序调用的方法,这可能不被认为是其“值状态”的一部分。然而,另一个对象很可能被分配一个执行重要计算的函数,从而使这个实例与其他实例不同,仅仅因为它引用了不同的函数。

如果一个对象的现有原型方法被另一个函数覆盖,该怎么办?它还能被认为与另一个相同的实例相等吗?这个问题只能在每种类型的具体情况下回答。

如前所述,异常将是一个严格的无类型对象。在这种情况下,唯一明智的选择是对每个成员进行迭代和递归比较。即使这样,人们也要问一个函数的“值”是什么?

其他回答

这是一个非常干净的CoffeeScript版本,你可以这样做:

Object::equals = (other) ->
  typeOf = Object::toString

  return false if typeOf.call(this) isnt typeOf.call(other)
  return `this == other` unless typeOf.call(other) is '[object Object]' or
                                typeOf.call(other) is '[object Array]'

  (return false unless this[key].equals other[key]) for key, value of this
  (return false if typeof this[key] is 'undefined') for key of other

  true

下面是测试:

  describe "equals", ->

    it "should consider two numbers to be equal", ->
      assert 5.equals(5)

    it "should consider two empty objects to be equal", ->
      assert {}.equals({})

    it "should consider two objects with one key to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana"}.equals {a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with keys in different orders to be equal", ->
      assert {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}.equals {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {fruit: "banana"}}.equals {a: {fruit: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with nested objects that are jumbled to be equal", ->
      assert {a: {a: "banana", kendall: "garrus"}}.equals {a: {kendall: "garrus", a: "banana"}}

    it "should consider two objects with arrays as values to be equal", ->
      assert {a: ["apple", "banana"]}.equals {a: ["apple", "banana"]}



    it "should not consider an object to be equal to null", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals null)

    it "should not consider two objects with different keys to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {})

    it "should not consider two objects with different values to be equal", ->
      assert !({a: "banana"}.equals {a: "grapefruit"})

下面的一些解决方案在性能、功能和风格方面存在问题……它们没有经过充分的考虑,其中一些在不同的情况下失败了。我试图在自己的解决方案中解决这个问题,我非常感谢您的反馈:

http://stamat.wordpress.com/javascript-object-comparison/

//Returns the object's class, Array, Date, RegExp, Object are of interest to us
var getClass = function(val) {
    return Object.prototype.toString.call(val)
        .match(/^\[object\s(.*)\]$/)[1];
};

//Defines the type of the value, extended typeof
var whatis = function(val) {

    if (val === undefined)
        return 'undefined';
    if (val === null)
        return 'null';

    var type = typeof val;

    if (type === 'object')
        type = getClass(val).toLowerCase();

    if (type === 'number') {
        if (val.toString().indexOf('.') > 0)
            return 'float';
        else
        return 'integer';
    }

    return type;
   };

var compareObjects = function(a, b) {
    if (a === b)
        return true;
    for (var i in a) {
        if (b.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            if (!equal(a[i],b[i])) return false;
        } else {
            return false;
        }
    }

    for (var i in b) {
        if (!a.hasOwnProperty(i)) {
            return false;
        }
    }
    return true;
};

var compareArrays = function(a, b) {
    if (a === b)
        return true;
    if (a.length !== b.length)
        return false;
    for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++){
        if(!equal(a[i], b[i])) return false;
    };
    return true;
};

var _equal = {};
_equal.array = compareArrays;
_equal.object = compareObjects;
_equal.date = function(a, b) {
    return a.getTime() === b.getTime();
};
_equal.regexp = function(a, b) {
    return a.toString() === b.toString();
};
//  uncoment to support function as string compare
//  _equal.fucntion =  _equal.regexp;



/*
 * Are two values equal, deep compare for objects and arrays.
 * @param a {any}
 * @param b {any}
 * @return {boolean} Are equal?
 */
var equal = function(a, b) {
    if (a !== b) {
        var atype = whatis(a), btype = whatis(b);

        if (atype === btype)
            return _equal.hasOwnProperty(atype) ? _equal[atype](a, b) : a==b;

        return false;
    }

    return true;
};

这是一个经典的javascript问题!我创建了一个方法来检查深度对象是否相等,其特性是能够从比较中选择要忽略的属性。 参数是要比较的两个对象,加上一个可选的字符串化属性-忽略相对路径数组。

function isObjectEqual( o1, o2, ignorePropsArr=[]) {
    // Deep Clone objects
    let _obj1 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o1)),
        _obj2 = JSON.parse(JSON.stringify(o2));
    // Remove props to ignore
    ignorePropsArr.map( p => { 
        eval('_obj1.'+p+' = _obj2.'+p+' = "IGNORED"');
    });
    // compare as strings
    let s1 = JSON.stringify(_obj1),
        s2 = JSON.stringify(_obj2);
    // return [s1==s2,s1,s2];
    return s1==s2;
}

// Objects 0 and 1 are exact equals
obj0 = { price: 66544.10, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj1 = { price: 66544.10, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj2 = { price: 66544.12, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj3 = { price: 66544.13, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046531], candles: {A: 541, B: 321, C: 4322}}
obj4 = { price: 66544.14, RSIs: [0.000432334, 0.00046530], candles: {A: 543, B: 321, C: 4322}}

isObjectEqual(obj0,obj1) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj2) // false
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj2,['price']) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj3,['price']) // false
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj3,['price','candles.A']) // true
isObjectEqual(obj0,obj4,['price','RSIs[1]'])   // true

这是我的版本。它正在使用new Object。ES5中引入的keys特性以及+、+和+的想法/测试:

function objectEquals(x, y) { 'use strict'; if (x === null || x === undefined || y === null || y === undefined) { return x === y; } // after this just checking type of one would be enough if (x.constructor !== y.constructor) { return false; } // if they are functions, they should exactly refer to same one (because of closures) if (x instanceof Function) { return x === y; } // if they are regexps, they should exactly refer to same one (it is hard to better equality check on current ES) if (x instanceof RegExp) { return x === y; } if (x === y || x.valueOf() === y.valueOf()) { return true; } if (Array.isArray(x) && x.length !== y.length) { return false; } // if they are dates, they must had equal valueOf if (x instanceof Date) { return false; } // if they are strictly equal, they both need to be object at least if (!(x instanceof Object)) { return false; } if (!(y instanceof Object)) { return false; } // recursive object equality check var p = Object.keys(x); return Object.keys(y).every(function (i) { return p.indexOf(i) !== -1; }) && p.every(function (i) { return objectEquals(x[i], y[i]); }); } /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// /// The borrowed tests, run them by clicking "Run code snippet" /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// var printResult = function (x) { if (x) { document.write('<div style="color: green;">Passed</div>'); } else { document.write('<div style="color: red;">Failed</div>'); } }; var assert = { isTrue: function (x) { printResult(x); }, isFalse: function (x) { printResult(!x); } } assert.isTrue(objectEquals(null,null)); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(null,undefined)); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /abc/)); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(/abc/, /123/)); var r = /abc/; assert.isTrue(objectEquals(r, r)); assert.isTrue(objectEquals("hi","hi")); assert.isTrue(objectEquals(5,5)); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(5,10)); assert.isTrue(objectEquals([],[])); assert.isTrue(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2])); assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[2,1])); assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1,2],[1,2,3])); assert.isTrue(objectEquals({},{})); assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:2})); assert.isTrue(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{b:2,a:1})); assert.isFalse(objectEquals({a:1,b:2},{a:1,b:3})); assert.isTrue(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}})); assert.isFalse(objectEquals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}},{1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}})); Object.prototype.equals = function (obj) { return objectEquals(this, obj); }; var assertFalse = assert.isFalse, assertTrue = assert.isTrue; assertFalse({}.equals(null)); assertFalse({}.equals(undefined)); assertTrue("hi".equals("hi")); assertTrue(new Number(5).equals(5)); assertFalse(new Number(5).equals(10)); assertFalse(new Number(1).equals("1")); assertTrue([].equals([])); assertTrue([1,2].equals([1,2])); assertFalse([1,2].equals([2,1])); assertFalse([1,2].equals([1,2,3])); assertTrue(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("2011-03-31"))); assertFalse(new Date("2011-03-31").equals(new Date("1970-01-01"))); assertTrue({}.equals({})); assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:2})); assertTrue({a:1,b:2}.equals({b:2,a:1})); assertFalse({a:1,b:2}.equals({a:1,b:3})); assertTrue({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}})); assertFalse({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:26}}.equals({1:{name:"mhc",age:28}, 2:{name:"arb",age:27}})); var a = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]}; var b = {a: 'text', b:[0,1]}; var c = {a: 'text', b: 0}; var d = {a: 'text', b: false}; var e = {a: 'text', b:[1,0]}; var i = { a: 'text', c: { b: [1, 0] } }; var j = { a: 'text', c: { b: [1, 0] } }; var k = {a: 'text', b: null}; var l = {a: 'text', b: undefined}; assertTrue(a.equals(b)); assertFalse(a.equals(c)); assertFalse(c.equals(d)); assertFalse(a.equals(e)); assertTrue(i.equals(j)); assertFalse(d.equals(k)); assertFalse(k.equals(l)); // from comments on stackoverflow post assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, undefined], [1, 2])); assert.isFalse(objectEquals([1, 2, 3], { 0: 1, 1: 2, 2: 3 })); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(new Date(1234), 1234)); // no two different function is equal really, they capture their context variables // so even if they have same toString(), they won't have same functionality var func = function (x) { return true; }; var func2 = function (x) { return true; }; assert.isTrue(objectEquals(func, func)); assert.isFalse(objectEquals(func, func2)); assert.isTrue(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func } })); assert.isFalse(objectEquals({ a: { b: func } }, { a: { b: func2 } }));

简短的回答

简单的答案是:不,没有一般的方法来确定一个对象等于另一个你所指的意义。例外情况是当您严格地认为一个对象是无类型的。

长话短说

这个概念是一个Equals方法,它比较一个对象的两个不同实例,以指示它们在值级别上是否相等。但是,定义Equals方法应该如何实现取决于具体的类型。对具有基本值的属性进行迭代比较可能还不够:对象可能包含与相等无关的属性。例如,

 function MyClass(a, b)
 {
     var c;
     this.getCLazy = function() {
         if (c === undefined) c = a * b // imagine * is really expensive
         return c;
     }
  }

在上面的例子中,c对于确定MyClass的任何两个实例是否相等并不重要,只有a和b是重要的。在某些情况下,c可能在不同实例之间有所不同,但在比较中并不显著。

注意,当成员本身也可能是某个类型的实例,并且每个实例都需要有确定相等的方法时,这个问题就会出现。

更复杂的是,在JavaScript中,数据和方法之间的区别是模糊的。

一个对象可以引用一个作为事件处理程序调用的方法,这可能不被认为是其“值状态”的一部分。然而,另一个对象很可能被分配一个执行重要计算的函数,从而使这个实例与其他实例不同,仅仅因为它引用了不同的函数。

如果一个对象的现有原型方法被另一个函数覆盖,该怎么办?它还能被认为与另一个相同的实例相等吗?这个问题只能在每种类型的具体情况下回答。

如前所述,异常将是一个严格的无类型对象。在这种情况下,唯一明智的选择是对每个成员进行迭代和递归比较。即使这样,人们也要问一个函数的“值”是什么?