如何使用PHP5类创建单例类?
当前回答
您实际上不需要使用单例模式，因为它被认为是反模式。基本上，有很多理由根本不实现这种模式。首先阅读:PHP单例类的最佳实践。
如果你仍然认为你需要使用单例模式，那么我们可以写一个类，允许我们通过扩展我们的SingletonClassVendor抽象类来获得单例功能。
这就是我解决这个问题的方法。
<?php
namespace wl;
/**
* @author DevWL
* @dosc allows only one instance for each extending class.
* it acts a litle bit as registry from the SingletonClassVendor abstract class point of view
* but it provides a valid singleton behaviour for its children classes
* Be aware, the singleton pattern is consider to be an anti-pattern
* mostly because it can be hard to debug and it comes with some limitations.
* In most cases you do not need to use singleton pattern
* so take a longer moment to think about it before you use it.
*/
abstract class SingletonClassVendor
{
/**
* holds an single instance of the child class
*
* @var array of objects
*/
protected static $instance = [];
/**
* @desc provides a single slot to hold an instance interchanble between all child classes.
* @return object
*/
public static final function getInstance(){
$class = get_called_class(); // or get_class(new static());
if(!isset(self::$instance[$class]) || !self::$instance[$class] instanceof $class){
self::$instance[$class] = new static(); // create and instance of child class which extends Singleton super class
echo "new ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return self::$instance[$class]; // remove this line after testing
}
echo "old ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return static::$instance[$class];
}
/**
* Make constructor abstract to force protected implementation of the __constructor() method, so that nobody can call directly "new Class()".
*/
abstract protected function __construct();
/**
* Make clone magic method private, so nobody can clone instance.
*/
private function __clone() {}
/**
* Make sleep magic method private, so nobody can serialize instance.
*/
private function __sleep() {}
/**
* Make wakeup magic method private, so nobody can unserialize instance.
*/
private function __wakeup() {}
}
使用的例子:
/**
* EXAMPLE
*/
/**
* @example 1 - Database class by extending SingletonClassVendor abstract class becomes fully functional singleton
* __constructor must be set to protected becaouse:
* 1 to allow instansiation from parent class
* 2 to prevent direct instanciation of object with "new" keword.
* 3 to meet requierments of SingletonClassVendor abstract class
*/
class Database extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $type = "SomeClass";
protected function __construct(){
echo "DDDDDDDDD". PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
/**
* @example 2 - Config ...
*/
class Config extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $name = "Config";
protected function __construct(){
echo "CCCCCCCCCC" . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
只是为了证明它能像预期的那样工作:
/**
* TESTING
*/
$bd1 = Database::getInstance(); // new
$bd2 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd3 = Config::getInstance(); // new
$bd4 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd5 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd6 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd7 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd8 = Config::getInstance(); // old
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL DATABASE INSTANCES".PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd1);
echo '$bd1 === $bd2' . ($bd1 === $bd2)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd2 === $bd6' . ($bd2 === $bd6)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd6 === $bd7' . ($bd6 === $bd7)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo PHP_EOL;
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL CONFIG INSTANCES". PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd3);
echo '$bd3 === $bd4' . ($bd3 === $bd4)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd4 === $bd5' . ($bd4 === $bd5)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd5 === $bd8' . ($bd5 === $bd8)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
其他回答
您实际上不需要使用单例模式，因为它被认为是反模式。基本上，有很多理由根本不实现这种模式。首先阅读:PHP单例类的最佳实践。
如果你仍然认为你需要使用单例模式，那么我们可以写一个类，允许我们通过扩展我们的SingletonClassVendor抽象类来获得单例功能。
这就是我解决这个问题的方法。
<?php
namespace wl;
/**
* @author DevWL
* @dosc allows only one instance for each extending class.
* it acts a litle bit as registry from the SingletonClassVendor abstract class point of view
* but it provides a valid singleton behaviour for its children classes
* Be aware, the singleton pattern is consider to be an anti-pattern
* mostly because it can be hard to debug and it comes with some limitations.
* In most cases you do not need to use singleton pattern
* so take a longer moment to think about it before you use it.
*/
abstract class SingletonClassVendor
{
/**
* holds an single instance of the child class
*
* @var array of objects
*/
protected static $instance = [];
/**
* @desc provides a single slot to hold an instance interchanble between all child classes.
* @return object
*/
public static final function getInstance(){
$class = get_called_class(); // or get_class(new static());
if(!isset(self::$instance[$class]) || !self::$instance[$class] instanceof $class){
self::$instance[$class] = new static(); // create and instance of child class which extends Singleton super class
echo "new ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return self::$instance[$class]; // remove this line after testing
}
echo "old ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return static::$instance[$class];
}
/**
* Make constructor abstract to force protected implementation of the __constructor() method, so that nobody can call directly "new Class()".
*/
abstract protected function __construct();
/**
* Make clone magic method private, so nobody can clone instance.
*/
private function __clone() {}
/**
* Make sleep magic method private, so nobody can serialize instance.
*/
private function __sleep() {}
/**
* Make wakeup magic method private, so nobody can unserialize instance.
*/
private function __wakeup() {}
}
使用的例子:
/**
* EXAMPLE
*/
/**
* @example 1 - Database class by extending SingletonClassVendor abstract class becomes fully functional singleton
* __constructor must be set to protected becaouse:
* 1 to allow instansiation from parent class
* 2 to prevent direct instanciation of object with "new" keword.
* 3 to meet requierments of SingletonClassVendor abstract class
*/
class Database extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $type = "SomeClass";
protected function __construct(){
echo "DDDDDDDDD". PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
/**
* @example 2 - Config ...
*/
class Config extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $name = "Config";
protected function __construct(){
echo "CCCCCCCCCC" . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
只是为了证明它能像预期的那样工作:
/**
* TESTING
*/
$bd1 = Database::getInstance(); // new
$bd2 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd3 = Config::getInstance(); // new
$bd4 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd5 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd6 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd7 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd8 = Config::getInstance(); // old
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL DATABASE INSTANCES".PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd1);
echo '$bd1 === $bd2' . ($bd1 === $bd2)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd2 === $bd6' . ($bd2 === $bd6)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd6 === $bd7' . ($bd6 === $bd7)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo PHP_EOL;
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL CONFIG INSTANCES". PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd3);
echo '$bd3 === $bd4' . ($bd3 === $bd4)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd4 === $bd5' . ($bd4 === $bd5)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd5 === $bd8' . ($bd5 === $bd8)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
我知道这可能会引起不必要的争论，但是我知道您可能需要多个数据库连接，所以我承认单例可能不是最好的解决方案……然而，我发现单例模式还有其他非常有用的用途。
Here's an example: I decided to roll my own MVC and templating engine because I wanted something really lightweight. However, the data that I want to display contains a lot of special math characters such as ≥ and μ and what have you... The data is stored as the actual UTF-8 character in my database rather than pre-HTML-encoded because my app can deliver other formats such as PDF and CSV in addition to HTML. The appropriate place to format for HTML is inside the template ("view" if you will) that is responsible for rendering that page section (snippet). I want to convert them to their appropriate HTML entities, but PHPs get_html_translation_table() function is not super fast. It makes better sense to retrieve the data one time and store as an array, making it available for all to use. Here's a sample I knocked together to test the speed. Presumably, this would work regardless of whether the other methods you use (after getting the instance) were static or not.
class EncodeHTMLEntities {
private static $instance = null;//stores the instance of self
private $r = null;//array of chars elligalbe for replacement
private function __clone(){
}//disable cloning, no reason to clone
private function __construct()
{
$allEntities = get_html_translation_table(HTML_ENTITIES, ENT_NOQUOTES);
$specialEntities = get_html_translation_table(HTML_SPECIALCHARS, ENT_NOQUOTES);
$this->r = array_diff($allEntities, $specialEntities);
}
public static function replace($string)
{
if(!(self::$instance instanceof self) ){
self::$instance = new self();
}
return strtr($string, self::$instance->r);
}
}
//test one million encodings of a string
$start = microtime(true);
for($x=0; $x<1000000; $x++){
$dump = EncodeHTMLEntities::replace("Reference method for diagnosis of CDAD, but clinical usefulness limited due to extended turnaround time (≥96 hrs)");
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "Run time: ".($end-$start)." seconds using singleton\n";
//now repeat the same without using singleton
$start = microtime(true);
for($x=0; $x<1000000; $x++){
$allEntities = get_html_translation_table(HTML_ENTITIES, ENT_NOQUOTES);
$specialEntities = get_html_translation_table(HTML_SPECIALCHARS, ENT_NOQUOTES);
$r = array_diff($allEntities, $specialEntities);
$dump = strtr("Reference method for diagnosis of CDAD, but clinical usefulness limited due to extended turnaround time (≥96 hrs)", $r);
}
$end = microtime(true);
echo "Run time: ".($end-$start)." seconds without using singleton";
基本上，我看到的典型结果如下:
php test.php Run time: 27.842966794968 seconds using singleton Run time: 237.78191494942 seconds without using singleton
因此，虽然我不是专家，但我认为没有更方便、更可靠的方法来减少对某些数据的缓慢调用的开销，同时使其超级简单(只需一行代码就可以完成所需的工作)。假设我的例子只有一个有用的方法，因此并不比一个全局定义的函数好，但是一旦你有了两个方法，你就想把它们组合在一起，对吗?我是不是太离谱了?
此外，我更喜欢真正做一些事情的例子，因为有时很难想象一个例子中包含“//在这里做一些有用的事情”这样的语句，这是我在搜索教程时经常看到的。
无论如何，我希望有任何关于为什么在这种情况下使用单例是有害的(或过于复杂)的反馈或评论。
你可能应该添加一个私有的__clone()方法来禁止克隆实例。
private function __clone() {}
如果您不包含此方法，则可能出现以下情况
$inst1=UserFactory::Instance(); // to stick with the example provided above
$inst2=clone $inst1;
现在$inst1 !== $inst2 -它们不再是同一个实例了。
不幸的是，当有多个子类时，Inwdr的答案就失效了。
下面是一个正确的可继承单例基类。
class Singleton
{
private static $instances = array();
protected function __construct() {}
protected function __clone() {}
public function __wakeup()
{
throw new Exception("Cannot unserialize singleton");
}
public static function getInstance()
{
$cls = get_called_class(); // late-static-bound class name
if (!isset(self::$instances[$cls])) {
self::$instances[$cls] = new static;
}
return self::$instances[$cls];
}
}
测试代码:
class Foo extends Singleton {}
class Bar extends Singleton {}
echo get_class(Foo::getInstance()) . "\n";
echo get_class(Bar::getInstance()) . "\n";
我很久以前就写过，想在这里分享
class SingletonDesignPattern {
//just for demo there will be only one instance
private static $instanceCount =0;
//create the private instance variable
private static $myInstance=null;
//make constructor private so no one create object using new Keyword
private function __construct(){}
//no one clone the object
private function __clone(){}
//avoid serialazation
public function __wakeup(){}
//ony one way to create object
public static function getInstance(){
if(self::$myInstance==null){
self::$myInstance=new SingletonDesignPattern();
self::$instanceCount++;
}
return self::$myInstance;
}
public static function getInstanceCount(){
return self::$instanceCount;
}
}
//now lets play with singleton design pattern
$instance = SingletonDesignPattern::getInstance();
$instance = SingletonDesignPattern::getInstance();
$instance = SingletonDesignPattern::getInstance();
$instance = SingletonDesignPattern::getInstance();
echo "number of instances: ".SingletonDesignPattern::getInstanceCount();
