如何使用PHP5类创建单例类?
当前回答
/**
* Singleton class
*
*/
final class UserFactory
{
private static $inst = null;
// Prevent cloning and de-serializing
private function __clone(){}
private function __wakeup(){}
/**
* Call this method to get singleton
*
* @return UserFactory
*/
public static function Instance()
{
if ($inst === null) {
$inst = new UserFactory();
}
return $inst;
}
/**
* Private ctor so nobody else can instantiate it
*
*/
private function __construct()
{
}
}
使用方法:
$fact = UserFactory::Instance();
$fact2 = UserFactory::Instance();
$fact == $fact2;
But:
$fact = new UserFactory()
抛出错误。
参见http://php.net/manual/en/language.variables.scope.php#language.variables.scope.static了解静态变量的作用域以及为什么设置static $inst = null;的工作原理。
其他回答
这应该是Singleton的正确方式。
class Singleton {
private static $instance;
private $count = 0;
protected function __construct(){
}
public static function singleton(){
if (!isset(self::$instance)) {
self::$instance = new Singleton;
}
return self::$instance;
}
public function increment()
{
return $this->count++;
}
protected function __clone(){
}
protected function __wakeup(){
}
}
所有这些复杂性(“后期静态绑定”……对我来说，harumph)只是PHP对象/类模型破碎的标志。如果类对象是一级对象(参见Python)，那么"$_instance"将是一个类实例变量——类对象的成员，而不是其实例的成员/属性，也与它的后代共享相反。在Smalltalk世界中，这就是“类变量”和“类实例变量”之间的区别。
在PHP中，在我看来，我们似乎需要牢记模式是编写代码的指南——我们可能会考虑Singleton模板，但试图编写从实际的“Singleton”类继承的代码对PHP来说是错误的(尽管我认为一些有进取心的人可以创建一个合适的SVN关键字)。
我将继续使用共享模板分别编写每个单例。
请注意，我绝对不会参与单身是邪恶的讨论，生命太短暂了。
我喜欢使用trait的@jose-segura方法，但不喜欢在子类上定义静态变量的需要。下面是一个解决方案，通过将实例缓存在一个静态局部变量中到按类名索引的工厂方法中来避免这种情况:
<?php
trait Singleton {
# Single point of entry for creating a new instance. For a given
# class always returns the same instance.
public static function instance(){
static $instances = array();
$class = get_called_class();
if( !isset($instances[$class]) ) $instances[$class] = new $class();
return $instances[$class];
}
# Kill traditional methods of creating new instances
protected function __clone() {}
protected function __construct() {}
}
用法与@jose-segura相同，只是在子类中不需要静态变量。
制作单例模式的真实和现代方法是:
<?php
/**
* Singleton Pattern.
*
* Modern implementation.
*/
class Singleton
{
/**
* Call this method to get singleton
*/
public static function instance()
{
static $instance = false;
if( $instance === false )
{
// Late static binding (PHP 5.3+)
$instance = new static();
}
return $instance;
}
/**
* Make constructor private, so nobody can call "new Class".
*/
private function __construct() {}
/**
* Make clone magic method private, so nobody can clone instance.
*/
private function __clone() {}
/**
* Make sleep magic method private, so nobody can serialize instance.
*/
private function __sleep() {}
/**
* Make wakeup magic method private, so nobody can unserialize instance.
*/
private function __wakeup() {}
}
现在你可以用它。
<?php
/**
* Database.
*
* Inherited from Singleton, so it's now got singleton behavior.
*/
class Database extends Singleton {
protected $label;
/**
* Example of that singleton is working correctly.
*/
public function setLabel($label)
{
$this->label = $label;
}
public function getLabel()
{
return $this->label;
}
}
// create first instance
$database = Database::instance();
$database->setLabel('Abraham');
echo $database->getLabel() . PHP_EOL;
// now try to create other instance as well
$other_db = Database::instance();
echo $other_db->getLabel() . PHP_EOL; // Abraham
$other_db->setLabel('Priler');
echo $database->getLabel() . PHP_EOL; // Priler
echo $other_db->getLabel() . PHP_EOL; // Priler
正如你所看到的，这种实现更加灵活。
您实际上不需要使用单例模式，因为它被认为是反模式。基本上，有很多理由根本不实现这种模式。首先阅读:PHP单例类的最佳实践。
如果你仍然认为你需要使用单例模式，那么我们可以写一个类，允许我们通过扩展我们的SingletonClassVendor抽象类来获得单例功能。
这就是我解决这个问题的方法。
<?php
namespace wl;
/**
* @author DevWL
* @dosc allows only one instance for each extending class.
* it acts a litle bit as registry from the SingletonClassVendor abstract class point of view
* but it provides a valid singleton behaviour for its children classes
* Be aware, the singleton pattern is consider to be an anti-pattern
* mostly because it can be hard to debug and it comes with some limitations.
* In most cases you do not need to use singleton pattern
* so take a longer moment to think about it before you use it.
*/
abstract class SingletonClassVendor
{
/**
* holds an single instance of the child class
*
* @var array of objects
*/
protected static $instance = [];
/**
* @desc provides a single slot to hold an instance interchanble between all child classes.
* @return object
*/
public static final function getInstance(){
$class = get_called_class(); // or get_class(new static());
if(!isset(self::$instance[$class]) || !self::$instance[$class] instanceof $class){
self::$instance[$class] = new static(); // create and instance of child class which extends Singleton super class
echo "new ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return self::$instance[$class]; // remove this line after testing
}
echo "old ". $class . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
return static::$instance[$class];
}
/**
* Make constructor abstract to force protected implementation of the __constructor() method, so that nobody can call directly "new Class()".
*/
abstract protected function __construct();
/**
* Make clone magic method private, so nobody can clone instance.
*/
private function __clone() {}
/**
* Make sleep magic method private, so nobody can serialize instance.
*/
private function __sleep() {}
/**
* Make wakeup magic method private, so nobody can unserialize instance.
*/
private function __wakeup() {}
}
使用的例子:
/**
* EXAMPLE
*/
/**
* @example 1 - Database class by extending SingletonClassVendor abstract class becomes fully functional singleton
* __constructor must be set to protected becaouse:
* 1 to allow instansiation from parent class
* 2 to prevent direct instanciation of object with "new" keword.
* 3 to meet requierments of SingletonClassVendor abstract class
*/
class Database extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $type = "SomeClass";
protected function __construct(){
echo "DDDDDDDDD". PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
/**
* @example 2 - Config ...
*/
class Config extends SingletonClassVendor
{
public $name = "Config";
protected function __construct(){
echo "CCCCCCCCCC" . PHP_EOL; // remove this line after testing
}
}
只是为了证明它能像预期的那样工作:
/**
* TESTING
*/
$bd1 = Database::getInstance(); // new
$bd2 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd3 = Config::getInstance(); // new
$bd4 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd5 = Config::getInstance(); // old
$bd6 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd7 = Database::getInstance(); // old
$bd8 = Config::getInstance(); // old
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL DATABASE INSTANCES".PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd1);
echo '$bd1 === $bd2' . ($bd1 === $bd2)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd2 === $bd6' . ($bd2 === $bd6)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd6 === $bd7' . ($bd6 === $bd7)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo PHP_EOL;
echo PHP_EOL."COMPARE ALL CONFIG INSTANCES". PHP_EOL;
var_dump($bd3);
echo '$bd3 === $bd4' . ($bd3 === $bd4)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd4 === $bd5' . ($bd4 === $bd5)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
echo '$bd5 === $bd8' . ($bd5 === $bd8)? ' TRUE' . PHP_EOL: ' FALSE' . PHP_EOL; // TRUE
