要序列化的自定义类:

[Serializable]
public class TestClass
{
    int x = 2;
    int y = 4;
    public TestClass(){}
    public TestClass(int x, int y)
    {
        this.x = x;
        this.y = y;
    }

    public int TestFunction()
    {
        return x + y;
    }
}

我已经附上了代码片段。也许这个能帮到你。

static void Main(string[] args)
{
    XmlSerializer xmlSerializer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(TestClass));

    MemoryStream memoryStream = new MemoryStream();
    XmlTextWriter xmlWriter = new XmlTextWriter(memoryStream, Encoding.UTF8);

    TestClass domain = new TestClass(10, 3);
    xmlSerializer.Serialize(xmlWriter, domain);
    memoryStream = (MemoryStream)xmlWriter.BaseStream;
    string xmlSerializedString = ConvertByteArray2Str(memoryStream.ToArray());

    TestClass xmlDomain = (TestClass)DeserializeObject(xmlSerializedString);

    Console.WriteLine(xmlDomain.TestFunction().ToString());
    Console.ReadLine();
}

另一方面，对编译错误进行故障排除是非常复杂的。这些问题在FileNotFoundException异常中显示，并显示如下信息:

File or assembly name abcdef.dll, or one of its dependencies, was not found. File name: "abcdef.dll"
   at System.Reflection.Assembly.nLoad( ... )
   at System.Reflection.Assembly.InternalLoad( ... )
   at System.Reflection.Assembly.Load(...)
   at System.CodeDom.Compiler.CompilerResults.get_CompiledAssembly() 

You may wonder what a file not found exception has to do with instantiating a serializer object, but remember: the constructor writes C# files and tries to compile them. The call stack of this exception provides some good information to support that suspicion. The exception occurred while the XmlSerializer attempted to load an assembly generated by CodeDOM calling the System.Reflection.Assembly.Load method. The exception does not provide an explanation as to why the assembly that the XmlSerializer was supposed to create was not present. In general, the assembly is not present because the compilation failed, which may happen because, under rare circumstances, the serialization attributes produce code that the C# compiler fails to compile.

请注意 当XmlSerializer在不能访问临时目录的帐户或安全环境下运行时，也会发生此错误。

来源: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa302290.aspx

此异常也可以由名为BindingFailure的托管调试助手(MDA)捕获。

如果您的应用程序被设计为附带预构建序列化程序集，则此MDA非常有用。这样做是为了提高应用程序的性能。它允许我们确保预先构建的序列化程序集由构建过程正确构建，并由应用程序加载，而无需动态重新构建。

除了在这种情况下，它实际上没什么用，因为正如其他帖子所说，当绑定错误被Serializer构造函数捕获时，序列化程序集将在运行时重新构建。所以你可以把它关掉。

XmlSerializer函数。FromTypes不会抛出异常，但它会泄漏内存。这就是为什么你需要为每个类型缓存这样的序列化器，以避免内存泄漏为每个创建的实例。

创建自己的XmlSerializer工厂并简单地使用它:

XmlSerializer serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(typeof(MyType));

工厂是这样的:

public static class XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow
{
    public static Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> _cache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

    private static object SyncRootCache = new object();        

    /// <summary>
    /// //the constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw exception, but it is said that it causes memory leaks
    /// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1127431/xmlserializer-giving-filenotfoundexception-at-constructor
    /// That is why I use dictionary to cache the serializers my self.
    /// </summary>
    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            //constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw the first chance exception           
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            //serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(type);
        }

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            _cache[type] = serializer;
        }
        return serializer;
    }       
}

更复杂的版本，没有内存泄漏的可能性(请有人检查代码):

    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                    return serializer;
            }
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                _cache[type] = serializer;
            }
        }          
        return serializer;
    }       
}

我的解决方案是直接使用反射来创建序列化器。这就绕过了导致异常的奇怪文件加载。我将其打包在一个helper函数中，该函数还负责缓存序列化器。

private static readonly Dictionary<Type,XmlSerializer> _xmlSerializerCache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

public static XmlSerializer CreateDefaultXmlSerializer(Type type) 
{
    XmlSerializer serializer;
    if (_xmlSerializerCache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
    {
        return serializer;
    }
    else
    {
        var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
        var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(type, null, null);
        serializer = new XmlSerializer(mapping);
        return _xmlSerializerCache[type] = serializer;
    }
}

看到过很多使用ConcurrentDictionary的建议，但没有可靠的例子，所以我将全身心投入到这个解决方案竞赛中。我不是一个线程安全的开发人员，所以如果这段代码不可靠，请为那些跟随的人说出来。

public static class XmlSerializerHelper
{
    private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

    public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
    {
        return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
        t =>
        {
            var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
            var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
            return new XmlSerializer(mapping);
        });
    }
}

我看过其他关于ConcurrentDictionary和Lazy加载值的文章。我不确定这是否与此相关，但这里是它的代码:

private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>>();

public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
{
    return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
    t =>
    {
        var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
        var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
        var lazyResult = new Lazy<XmlSerializer>(() => new XmlSerializer(mapping), LazyThreadSafetyMode.ExecutionAndPublication);
        return lazyResult;
    }).Value;
}