我一直在使用的一个应用程序在尝试序列化类型时失败了。
像这样的陈述
XmlSerializer lizer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(MyType));
生产:
System.IO.FileNotFoundException occurred
Message="Could not load file or assembly '[Containing Assembly of MyType].XmlSerializers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified."
Source="mscorlib"
FileName="[Containing Assembly of MyType].XmlSerializers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"
FusionLog=""
StackTrace:
at System.Reflection.Assembly._nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection)
at System.Reflection.Assembly.nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection)
我没有为我的类定义任何特殊的序列化器。
我该如何解决这个问题?
XmlSerializer函数。FromTypes不会抛出异常，但它会泄漏内存。这就是为什么你需要为每个类型缓存这样的序列化器，以避免内存泄漏为每个创建的实例。
创建自己的XmlSerializer工厂并简单地使用它:
XmlSerializer serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(typeof(MyType));
工厂是这样的:
public static class XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow
{
public static Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> _cache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();
private static object SyncRootCache = new object();
/// <summary>
/// //the constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw exception, but it is said that it causes memory leaks
/// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1127431/xmlserializer-giving-filenotfoundexception-at-constructor
/// That is why I use dictionary to cache the serializers my self.
/// </summary>
public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
{
XmlSerializer serializer;
lock (SyncRootCache)
{
if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
return serializer;
}
lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
{
//constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw the first chance exception
serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
//serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(type);
}
lock (SyncRootCache)
{
_cache[type] = serializer;
}
return serializer;
}
}
更复杂的版本，没有内存泄漏的可能性(请有人检查代码):
public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
{
XmlSerializer serializer;
lock (SyncRootCache)
{
if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
return serializer;
}
lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
{
lock (SyncRootCache)
{
if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
return serializer;
}
serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
lock (SyncRootCache)
{
_cache[type] = serializer;
}
}
return serializer;
}
}
看到过很多使用ConcurrentDictionary的建议，但没有可靠的例子，所以我将全身心投入到这个解决方案竞赛中。我不是一个线程安全的开发人员，所以如果这段代码不可靠，请为那些跟随的人说出来。
public static class XmlSerializerHelper
{
private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();
public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
{
return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
t =>
{
var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
return new XmlSerializer(mapping);
});
}
}
我看过其他关于ConcurrentDictionary和Lazy加载值的文章。我不确定这是否与此相关，但这里是它的代码:
private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>>();
public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
{
return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
t =>
{
var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
var lazyResult = new Lazy<XmlSerializer>(() => new XmlSerializer(mapping), LazyThreadSafetyMode.ExecutionAndPublication);
return lazyResult;
}).Value;
}
