看到过很多使用ConcurrentDictionary的建议，但没有可靠的例子，所以我将全身心投入到这个解决方案竞赛中。我不是一个线程安全的开发人员，所以如果这段代码不可靠，请为那些跟随的人说出来。

public static class XmlSerializerHelper
{
    private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

    public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
    {
        return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
        t =>
        {
            var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
            var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
            return new XmlSerializer(mapping);
        });
    }
}

我看过其他关于ConcurrentDictionary和Lazy加载值的文章。我不确定这是否与此相关，但这里是它的代码:

private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>> TypeSerializers = new ConcurrentDictionary<Type, Lazy<XmlSerializer>>();

public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
{
    return TypeSerializers.GetOrAdd(type,
    t =>
    {
        var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
        var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(t, null, null);
        var lazyResult = new Lazy<XmlSerializer>(() => new XmlSerializer(mapping), LazyThreadSafetyMode.ExecutionAndPublication);
        return lazyResult;
    }).Value;
}

此异常也可以由名为BindingFailure的托管调试助手(MDA)捕获。

如果您的应用程序被设计为附带预构建序列化程序集，则此MDA非常有用。这样做是为了提高应用程序的性能。它允许我们确保预先构建的序列化程序集由构建过程正确构建，并由应用程序加载，而无需动态重新构建。

除了在这种情况下，它实际上没什么用，因为正如其他帖子所说，当绑定错误被Serializer构造函数捕获时，序列化程序集将在运行时重新构建。所以你可以把它关掉。

Like Martin Sherburn said, this is normal behavior. The constructor of the XmlSerializer first tries to find an assembly named [YourAssembly].XmlSerializers.dll which should contain the generated class for serialization of your type. Since such a DLL has not been generated yet (they are not by default), a FileNotFoundException is thrown. When that happenes, XmlSerializer's constructor catches that exception, and the DLL is generated automatically at runtime by the XmlSerializer's constructor (this is done by generating C# source files in the %temp% directory of your computer, then compiling them using the C# compiler). Additional constructions of an XmlSerializer for the same type will just use the already generated DLL.

更新:从。net 4.5开始，XmlSerializer不再执行代码生成，也不再为了在运行时创建序列化程序集而使用c#编译器执行编译，除非通过设置配置文件设置(useLegacySerializerGeneration)显式强制执行。此更改消除了对csc.exe的依赖，并提高了启动性能。来源:. net Framework 4.5 Readme，章节1.3.8.1。

异常由XmlSerializer的构造函数处理。你不需要自己做任何事情，你可以点击“继续”(F5)继续执行你的程序，一切都会好的。如果你被异常停止程序执行并弹出异常助手所困扰，你要么关闭“只是我的代码”，要么将FileNotFoundException设置为在抛出时中断执行，而不是在“User-unhandled”时。

打开“Just My Code”，请转到“Tools >> Options >> Debugging >> General >> enable Just My Code”。要关闭FileNotFound被抛出时的执行中断，请转到调试>>异常>>找到>>输入'FileNotFoundException' >>取消System.IO.FileNotFoundException中的' thrown '复选框。

只是作为参考。从D-B的回答和评论中，我得出了这个接近D-B的解决方案。它在我的所有情况下都工作得很好，并且是线程安全的。我不认为使用ConcurrentDictionary是可以的。

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Xml.Serialization;

namespace HQ.Util.General
{
    public class XmlSerializerHelper
    {
        private static readonly Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> _dictTypeToSerializer = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

        public static XmlSerializer GetSerializer(Type type)
        {
            lock (_dictTypeToSerializer)
            {
                XmlSerializer serializer;
                if (! _dictTypeToSerializer.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                {
                    var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
                    var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(type, null, null);
                    serializer = new XmlSerializer(mapping);
                    return _dictTypeToSerializer[type] = serializer;
                }

                return serializer;
            }
        }
    }
}

用法:

        if (File.Exists(Path))
        {
            using (XmlTextReader reader = new XmlTextReader(Path))
            {
                // XmlSerializer x  = new XmlSerializer(typeof(T));
                var x = XmlSerializerHelper.GetSerializer(typeof(T));

                try
                {
                    options = (OptionsBase<T>)x.Deserialize(reader);
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                    Log.Instance.AddEntry(LogType.LogException, "Unable to open Options file: " + Path, ex);
                }
            }
        }

XmlSerializer函数。FromTypes不会抛出异常，但它会泄漏内存。这就是为什么你需要为每个类型缓存这样的序列化器，以避免内存泄漏为每个创建的实例。

创建自己的XmlSerializer工厂并简单地使用它:

XmlSerializer serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(typeof(MyType));

工厂是这样的:

public static class XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow
{
    public static Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> _cache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

    private static object SyncRootCache = new object();        

    /// <summary>
    /// //the constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw exception, but it is said that it causes memory leaks
    /// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1127431/xmlserializer-giving-filenotfoundexception-at-constructor
    /// That is why I use dictionary to cache the serializers my self.
    /// </summary>
    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            //constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw the first chance exception           
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            //serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(type);
        }

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            _cache[type] = serializer;
        }
        return serializer;
    }       
}

更复杂的版本，没有内存泄漏的可能性(请有人检查代码):

    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                    return serializer;
            }
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                _cache[type] = serializer;
            }
        }          
        return serializer;
    }       
}

我得到了同样的错误，这是由于我试图反序列化的类型没有默认的无参数构造函数。我添加了一个构造函数，它开始工作了。