我一直在使用的一个应用程序在尝试序列化类型时失败了。

像这样的陈述

XmlSerializer lizer = new XmlSerializer(typeof(MyType));

生产:

System.IO.FileNotFoundException occurred
  Message="Could not load file or assembly '[Containing Assembly of MyType].XmlSerializers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified."
  Source="mscorlib"
  FileName="[Containing Assembly of MyType].XmlSerializers, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=null"
  FusionLog=""
  StackTrace:
       at System.Reflection.Assembly._nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection)
       at System.Reflection.Assembly.nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection)

我没有为我的类定义任何特殊的序列化器。

我该如何解决这个问题?


当前回答

XmlSerializer函数。FromTypes不会抛出异常,但它会泄漏内存。这就是为什么你需要为每个类型缓存这样的序列化器,以避免内存泄漏为每个创建的实例。

创建自己的XmlSerializer工厂并简单地使用它:

XmlSerializer serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(typeof(MyType));

工厂是这样的:

public static class XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow
{
    public static Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer> _cache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

    private static object SyncRootCache = new object();        

    /// <summary>
    /// //the constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw exception, but it is said that it causes memory leaks
    /// http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1127431/xmlserializer-giving-filenotfoundexception-at-constructor
    /// That is why I use dictionary to cache the serializers my self.
    /// </summary>
    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            //constructor XmlSerializer.FromTypes does not throw the first chance exception           
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            //serializer = XmlSerializerFactoryNoThrow.Create(type);
        }

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            _cache[type] = serializer;
        }
        return serializer;
    }       
}

更复杂的版本,没有内存泄漏的可能性(请有人检查代码):

    public static XmlSerializer Create(Type type)
    {
        XmlSerializer serializer;

        lock (SyncRootCache)
        {
            if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                return serializer;
        }

        lock (type) //multiple variable of type of one type is same instance
        {
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                if (_cache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
                    return serializer;
            }
            serializer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { type })[0];
            lock (SyncRootCache)
            {
                _cache[type] = serializer;
            }
        }          
        return serializer;
    }       
}

其他回答

我的解决方案是直接使用反射来创建序列化器。这就绕过了导致异常的奇怪文件加载。我将其打包在一个helper函数中,该函数还负责缓存序列化器。

private static readonly Dictionary<Type,XmlSerializer> _xmlSerializerCache = new Dictionary<Type, XmlSerializer>();

public static XmlSerializer CreateDefaultXmlSerializer(Type type) 
{
    XmlSerializer serializer;
    if (_xmlSerializerCache.TryGetValue(type, out serializer))
    {
        return serializer;
    }
    else
    {
        var importer = new XmlReflectionImporter();
        var mapping = importer.ImportTypeMapping(type, null, null);
        serializer = new XmlSerializer(mapping);
        return _xmlSerializerCache[type] = serializer;
    }
}

我也有同样的问题,直到我使用第三方工具从XSD生成类,它工作了!我发现这个工具在类的顶部添加了一些额外的代码。当我把同样的代码添加到我原来的类的顶部时,它起作用了。以下是我添加的内容……

#pragma warning disable
namespace MyNamespace
{
  using System;
  using System.Diagnostics;
  using System.Xml.Serialization;
  using System.Collections;
  using System.Xml.Schema;
  using System.ComponentModel;
  using System.Xml;
  using System.Collections.Generic;

  [System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Xml", "4.6.1064.2")]
  [System.SerializableAttribute()]
  [System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()]
  [System.ComponentModel.DesignerCategoryAttribute("code")]
  [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlTypeAttribute(AnonymousType = true)]
  [System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRootAttribute(Namespace = "", IsNullable = false)]
  public partial class MyClassName
  {
  ...

有一个变通的办法。如果你使用

XmlSerializer lizer = XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new[] { typeof(MyType) })[0];

它应该避免这种异常。这对我很管用。

警告:不要多次使用,否则会出现内存泄漏

如果多次使用此方法为同一类型创建XmlSerializer实例,将会导致内存严重泄漏!

这是因为该方法绕过了内置缓存提供的XmlSerializer(type)和XmlSerializer(type, defaultNameSpace)构造函数(所有其他构造函数也绕过缓存)。

如果使用任何方法来创建XmlSerializer,而不是通过这两个构造函数,那么必须实现自己的缓存,否则会导致内存泄漏。

在Visual Studio项目属性中,有一个选项显示“生成序列化程序集”。尝试为生成[包含MyType的程序集]的项目打开该选项。

Martin Sheburn最初的回答是正确的。 来自edeboursetty, tomas-kubes)的代码示例,quadfinity应该解决在调试器中不引发过量异常的问题。

这里有一个简短的解决方案:

internal sealed static class XmlSerializerHelper
{
    private static readonly ConcurrentDictionary<Type, System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer> s_xmlSerializers = new();

    public static System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer Get<T>()
    {
        return s_xmlSerializers.GetOrAdd(typeof(T), _ => System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSerializer.FromTypes(new [] {typeof(T)})[0]);
    }
}