Forth可以随时改变数字的基数:

HEX 10 DECIMAL 16 - .
0 Ok

它也不需要是预定义的:

36 BASE ! 1Z DECIMAL .
71 Ok

VBScript的日期/时间文字(为什么这个仍然如此罕见?):

mydate = #1/2/2010 5:23 PM#

If mydate > #1/1/2010 17:00# Then ' ...

编辑:日期文字是相对的(那么它们在技术上是文字吗?):

mydate = #Jan 3# ' Jan 3 of the current year

VB。NET，因为它是编译的，所以不支持相对日期文字。只支持日期或时间字面量，但缺失的时间或日期被假定为零。

编辑[2]:当然，有一些奇怪的极端情况会出现相对日期……

mydate = #Feb 29# ' executed on 2010-01-05, yields 2/1/2029

好吧，既然问题是断断续续的，我就加入到“有趣”中来

Go(又名Issue9)使用大写的可见性:

如果你用大写字母命名某个东西，它就会被公众访问。 如果你使用小写，它将被包保护:

包装外可见:

func Print(v ...) { 
}

包外不可见

func print( v ... ) {
}

你可以在这个原始答案中找到更多。

我一直想知道这个函数在Java Core库的Math类中的用途:

static double expm1(double x);  // Returns e^x - 1.

我喜欢这类东西在JavaScript中很好的事实:

var futureDate = new Date(2010,77,154);
alert(futureDate);

结果是距离2010年第0个月的第0天77个月零154天，即2016年11月1日

在fortran中(当然是77，可能在95中也是如此)，未声明的变量和以I到N开头的参数(“In”组)将是INTEGER，所有其他未声明的变量和参数将是REAL(源)。这与“在某些情况下可选的空白”相结合，导致了最著名的错误之一。

正如弗雷德·韦伯在1990年的《另类民间传说:计算机》一书中所说:

I worked at Nasa during the summer of 1963. The group I was working in was doing preliminary work on the Mission Control Center computer systems and programs. My office mate had the job of testing out an orbit computation program which had been used during the Mercury flights. Running some test data with known answers through it, he was getting answers that were close, but not accurate enough. So, he started looking for numerical problems in the algorithm, checking to make sure his tests data was really correct, etc. After a couple of weeks with no results, he came across a DO statement, in the form: DO 10 I=1.10 This statement was interpreted by the compiler (correctly) as: DO10I = 1.10 The programmer had clearly intended: DO 10 I = 1, 10 After changing the . to a , the program results were correct to the desired accuracy. Apparently, the program's answers had been "good enough" for the sub-orbital Mercury flights, so no one suspected a bug until they tried to get greater accuracy, in anticipation of later orbital and moon flights. As far as I know, this particular bug was never blamed for any actual failure of a space flight, but the other details here seem close enough that I'm sure this incident is the source of the DO story.

我认为这是一个很大的WTF，如果DO10I被作为DO10I，并且反过来，因为隐式声明被认为是类型REAL。这是个很棒的故事。