没有使用With子句或适当的连接并依赖子查询。

反模式:

select 
 ...
from data
where RECORD.STATE IN (
          SELECT STATEID
            FROM STATE
           WHERE NAME IN
                    ('Published to test',
                     'Approved for public',
                     'Published to public',
                     'Archived'
                    ))

好: 我喜欢使用with子句使我的意图更易于阅读。

with valid_states as (
          SELECT STATEID
            FROM STATE
           WHERE NAME IN
                    ('Published to test',
                     'Approved for public',
                     'Published to public',
                     'Archived'
                    )
select  ... from data, valid_states
where data.state = valid_states.state

最好的:

select 
  ... 
from data join states using (state)
where 
states.state in  ('Published to test',
                     'Approved for public',
                     'Published to public',
                     'Archived'
                    )

我只是把这个放在一起，基于一些SQL响应这里在SO。

认为触发器之于数据库就像事件处理程序之于OOP是一种严重的反模式。有一种看法是，任何旧的逻辑都可以放入触发器中，当一个事务(事件)在表上发生时被触发。

不正确的。最大的区别之一是触发器是同步的——而且是完全同步的，因为它们在集合操作上是同步的，而不是在行操作上。在OOP方面，正好相反——事件是实现异步事务的有效方法。

我最不喜欢的是

Using spaces when creating tables, sprocs etc. I'm fine with CamelCase or under_scores and singular or plurals and UPPERCASE or lowercase but having to refer to a table or column [with spaces], especially if [ it is oddly spaced] (yes, I've run into this) really irritates me. Denormalized data. A table doesn't have to be perfectly normalized, but when I run into a table of employees that has information about their current evaluation score or their primary anything, it tells me that I will probably need to make a separate table at some point and then try to keep them synced. I will normalize the data first and then if I see a place where denormalization helps, I'll consider it. Overuse of either views or cursors. Views have a purpose, but when each table is wrapped in a view it's too much. I've had to use cursors a few times, but generally you can use other mechanisms for this. Access. Can a program be an anti-pattern? We have SQL Server at my work, but a number of people use access due to it's availabilty, "ease of use" and "friendliness" to non-technical users. There is too much here to go into, but if you've been in a similar environment, you know.

临时表滥用。

特别是这类事情:

SELECT personid, firstname, lastname, age
INTO #tmpPeople
FROM People
WHERE lastname like 's%'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE firstname = 'John'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE firstname = 'Jon'

DELETE FROM #tmpPeople
WHERE age > 35

UPDATE People
SET firstname = 'Fred'
WHERE personid IN (SELECT personid from #tmpPeople)

不要从查询中构建临时表，只是为了删除不需要的行。

是的，我在生产db中看到过这种形式的代码页。

我最喜欢的SQL反模式:

对非唯一列进行JOIN，并使用SELECT DISTINCT修剪结果。

创建连接多个表的视图，只是为了从一个表中选择少数列。

 CREATE VIEW my_view AS 
     SELECT * FROM table1
     JOIN table2 ON (...)
     JOIN table3 ON (...);

 SELECT col1, col2 FROM my_view WHERE col3 = 123;

var query = "select COUNT(*) from Users where UserName = '" 
            + tbUser.Text 
            + "' and Password = '" 
            + tbPassword.Text +"'";

盲目相信用户输入 不使用参数化查询 明文密码