没有简单的办法。 如果目标是保持较高的语句缓存比(即不是每个参数都创建一条语句)，您可以执行以下操作:

创建带有几个参数(例如10个)的语句: ．.． 一个在 (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?) ... 绑定所有实际参数 setString(1、“foo”); setString(2,“酒吧”); 其余的绑定为NULL Types.VARCHAR setNull (3) .．. Types.VARCHAR setNull (10)

NULL从不匹配任何东西，因此它会被SQL计划构建器优化。

当你将List传递给DAO函数时，逻辑很容易自动化:

while( i < param.size() ) {
  ps.setString(i+1,param.get(i));
  i++;
}

while( i < MAX_PARAMS ) {
  ps.setNull(i+1,Types.VARCHAR);
  i++;
}

我只是为此制定了一个特定于postgresql的选项。它有点像黑客，有自己的优缺点和局限性，但它似乎是有效的，而且不局限于特定的开发语言、平台或PG驱动程序。

当然，诀窍是找到一种方法，将任意长度的值集合作为单个参数传递，并让db将其识别为多个值。我的解决方案是从集合中的值构造一个带分隔符的字符串，将该字符串作为单个参数传递，并使用string_to_array()与PostgreSQL正确使用它所需的强制转换。

因此，如果你想搜索“foo”，“blah”和“abc”，你可以将它们连接成一个字符串，如:'foo,blah,abc'。下面是直接的SQL语句:

select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array('foo,blah,abc', ',')::text[]);

显然，您可以将显式强制转换更改为您想要的结果值数组——int、text、uuid等。因为函数接受一个字符串值(或者两个，如果你也想自定义分隔符)，你可以在准备好的语句中作为参数传递它:

select column from table
where search_column = any (string_to_array($1, ',')::text[]);

这甚至足够灵活，可以支持like比较:

select column from table
where search_column like any (string_to_array('foo%,blah%,abc%', ',')::text[]);

Again, no question it's a hack, but it works and allows you to still use pre-compiled prepared statements that take *ahem* discrete parameters, with the accompanying security and (maybe) performance benefits. Is it advisable and actually performant? Naturally, it depends, as you've got string parsing and possibly casting going on before your query even runs. If you're expecting to send three, five, a few dozen values, sure, it's probably fine. A few thousand? Yeah, maybe not so much. YMMV, limitations and exclusions apply, no warranty express or implied.

但它确实有效。

我遇到了一些与准备好的语句相关的限制:

The prepared statements are cached only inside the same session (Postgres), so it will really work only with connection pooling A lot of different prepared statements as proposed by @BalusC may cause the cache to overfill and previously cached statements will be dropped The query has to be optimized and use indices. Sounds obvious, however e.g. the ANY(ARRAY...) statement proposed by @Boris in one of the top answers cannot use indices and query will be slow despite caching The prepared statement caches the query plan as well and the actual values of any parameters specified in the statement are unavailable.

在建议的解决方案中，我会选择一个不会降低查询性能并且查询次数较少的解决方案。这将是#4(批处理少数查询)从@Don链接或指定NULL值为不需要的'?@Vladimir Dyuzhev提出的标记

下面是一个完整的Java解决方案来为你创建准备好的语句:

/*usage:

Util u = new Util(500); //500 items per bracket. 
String sqlBefore  = "select * from myTable where (";
List<Integer> values = new ArrayList<Integer>(Arrays.asList(1,2,4,5)); 
string sqlAfter = ") and foo = 'bar'"; 

PreparedStatement ps = u.prepareStatements(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, connection, "someId");
*/



import java.sql.Connection;
import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
import java.sql.SQLException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

public class Util {

    private int numValuesInClause;

    public Util(int numValuesInClause) {
        super();
        this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
    }

    public int getNumValuesInClause() {
        return numValuesInClause;
    }

    public void setNumValuesInClause(int numValuesInClause) {
        this.numValuesInClause = numValuesInClause;
    }

    /** Split a given list into a list of lists for the given size of numValuesInClause*/
    public List<List<Integer>> splitList(
            List<Integer> values) {


        List<List<Integer>> newList = new ArrayList<List<Integer>>(); 
        while (values.size() > numValuesInClause) {
            List<Integer> sublist = values.subList(0,numValuesInClause);
            List<Integer> values2 = values.subList(numValuesInClause, values.size());   
            values = values2; 

            newList.add( sublist);
        }
        newList.add(values);

        return newList;
    }

    /**
     * Generates a series of split out in clause statements. 
     * @param sqlBefore ""select * from dual where ("
     * @param values [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]
     * @param "sqlAfter ) and id = 5"
     * @return "select * from dual where (id in (1,2,3) or id in (4,5,6) or id in (7,8,9) or id in (10)"
     */
    public String genInClauseSql(String sqlBefore, List<Integer> values,
            String sqlAfter, String identifier) 
    {
        List<List<Integer>> newLists = splitList(values);
        String stmt = sqlBefore;

        /* now generate the in clause for each list */
        int j = 0; /* keep track of list:newLists index */
        for (List<Integer> list : newLists) {
            stmt = stmt + identifier +" in (";
            StringBuilder innerBuilder = new StringBuilder();

            for (int i = 0; i < list.size(); i++) {
                innerBuilder.append("?,");
            }



            String inClause = innerBuilder.deleteCharAt(
                    innerBuilder.length() - 1).toString();

            stmt = stmt + inClause;
            stmt = stmt + ")";


            if (++j < newLists.size()) {
                stmt = stmt + " OR ";
            }

        }

        stmt = stmt + sqlAfter;
        return stmt;
    }

    /**
     * Method to convert your SQL and a list of ID into a safe prepared
     * statements
     * 
     * @throws SQLException
     */
    public PreparedStatement prepareStatements(String sqlBefore,
            ArrayList<Integer> values, String sqlAfter, Connection c, String identifier)
            throws SQLException {

        /* First split our potentially big list into lots of lists */
        String stmt = genInClauseSql(sqlBefore, values, sqlAfter, identifier);
        PreparedStatement ps = c.prepareStatement(stmt);

        int i = 1;
        for (int val : values)
        {

            ps.setInt(i++, val);

        }
        return ps;

    }

}

我的解决方案(JavaScript)

    var s1 = " SELECT "

 + "FROM   table t "

 + "  where t.field in ";

  var s3 = '(';

  for(var i =0;i<searchTerms.length;i++)
  {
    if(i+1 == searchTerms.length)
    {
     s3  = s3+'?)';
    }
    else
    {
        s3  = s3+'?, ' ;
    }
   }
    var query = s1+s3;

    var pstmt = connection.prepareStatement(query);

     for(var i =0;i<searchTerms.length;i++)
    {
        pstmt.setString(i+1, searchTerms[i]);
    }

SearchTerms是包含你的输入/键/字段等的数组

对于某些情况，regexp可能会有所帮助。 下面是我在Oracle上查看的一个例子，它是有效的。

select * from my_table where REGEXP_LIKE (search_column, 'value1|value2')

但它也有一些缺点:

它应用的任何列都应该转换为varchar/char，至少是隐式转换。 使用特殊字符时要小心。 它会降低性能——在我的例子中，in版本使用索引和范围扫描，而REGEXP版本执行全扫描。