你遇到过的源代码中最好的注释是什么?
当前回答
* ...and don't just declare it volatile and think you've solved
* the problem. You young punks think you know what volatile
* means... why in my day we had to cast it volatile uphill
* both ways, and the code still didn't work! Whippersnappers...
其他回答
/**
* This run through all the guipublisherbuyRecord , the records those have
* diff. is buytotal and prior to buy isRecommendedBillingClickedWarning flag
* is set if priously RB ran and this time not.
*
* --What?
*
* @return
* @throws AppException
*/
我只是在一个非常简单的大学课程测试c++程序中碰到了这个。
我在评论一个类。
在析构函数中…
// Choose! Choose the form of the Destructor!
// The choice is made! The Traveler has come!
//Code sanitized to protect the foolish. using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Text; using System.Reflection; using System.Web.UI; namespace Mobile.Web.Control { /// <summary> /// Class used to work around Richard being a fucking idiot /// </summary> /// <remarks> /// The point of this is to work around his poor design so that paging will /// work on a mobile control. The main problem is the BindCompany() method, /// which he hoped would be able to do everything. I hope he dies. /// </remarks> public abstract class RichardIsAFuckingIdiotControl : MobileBaseControl, ICompanyProfileControl { protected abstract Pager Pager { get; } public void BindCompany(int companyId) { } public RichardIsAFuckingIdiotControl() { MakeSureNobodyAccidentallyGetsBittenByRichardsStupidity(); } private void MakeSureNobodyAccidentallyGetsBittenByRichardsStupidity() { // Make sure nobody is actually using that fucking bindcompany method MethodInfo m = this.GetType().GetMethod("BindCompany", BindingFlags.DeclaredOnly | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic); if (m != null) { throw new RichardIsAFuckingIdiotException("No!! Don't use the fucking BindCompany method!!!"); } // P.S. this method is a joke ... the rest of the class is fucking serious } /// <summary> /// This returns true if this control is supposed to be doing anything /// at all for this request. Richard thought it was a good idea to load /// the entire website during every request and have things turn themselves /// off. He also thought bandanas and aviator sunglasses were "fuckin' /// gnarly, dude." /// </summary> protected bool IsThisTheRightPageImNotSureBecauseRichardIsDumb() { return Request.QueryString["Section"] == this.MenuItemKey; } protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { if (IsThisTheRightPageImNotSureBecauseRichardIsDumb()) { Page.LoadComplete += new EventHandler(Page_LoadComplete); Pager.RowCount = GetRowCountBecauseRichardIsDumb(); } base.OnLoad(e); } protected abstract int GetRowCountBecauseRichardIsDumb(); protected abstract void BindDataBecauseRichardIsDumb(); void Page_LoadComplete(object sender, EventArgs e) { BindDataBecauseRichardIsDumb(); } // the rest of his reduh-ndant interface members public abstract string MenuItemName { get; set; } public abstract string MenuItemKey { get; set; } public abstract bool IsCapable(CapabilityCheck checker, int companyId); public abstract bool ShowInMenu { get; } public virtual Control CreateHeaderControl() { return null; } } }
更新:代码的原作者已经暴露了自己,所以我必须在适当的地方给予赞扬。Dan McKinley在我入职后不久就离开了我所在的公司,他讲述了更多关于代码的内容,解释了一些背景知识和“Richard”所写的一些“WTF”。
我刚刚在。net的自定义Linq提供程序中找到了这个:
//select is a royal pain in the ass where
//the parameter passed to CreateQuery isn't actually the one that goes in the call
//requiring this workaround. Not sure how straight Linq to Objects does it.
还有这个
//expressions have to be compiled in order to work with the method call on
//straight Enumerable somehow, LINQ to objects itself magically does this.
//Reflector shows a mess, so I (Aaron) invented my own way. God love unit tests!
我刚刚也找到了这个…一切都会变得更好
//ok, this is a hairy, dirty, and nasty piece of code
//the alternatives are substantially worse than this though
//i.e. when you do your own provider, LINQ assumes that
//you are going to implement your own expression tree visitor and
//do it all yourself. Frankly, I still have xmas shopping to do
//and I really don't want us to be foobared when we get
//even more extension methods added to LINQ
//therefore, we are pulling execute based on taking the calling the
//standard execute on enumerable, but using our own class
//
//optimization can occur from here on an as needed basis, that is
//check for the value of mex.Method.Name, and write a handler for
//that method
//
//also, it may not be a bad idea to rather than do this reflection
//each and every time somehow cache the reflected methodinfos and do
//lookups that way that said, we need a complete red/green/refactor
//cycle here before I am touching that one
还有这个
//Compile that mutherf-ker, invoke it, and get the resulting hash
我刚刚在一些遗留代码中发现了这个..
'CANNOT JUST QUIT!
推荐文章
- 在VS Code中禁用“Comments are not allowed In JSON”错误
- Swift:理解// MARK
- 在构建中编写注释的语法是什么?gradle文件?
- Java注释中的/**和/*
- 有没有办法注释掉.ASPX页面中的标记?
- Jenkins:注释可以添加到Jenkins文件中吗?
- TypeScript注释的语法记录在哪里?
- CSV文件可以有注释吗?
- 什么是自文档化代码?它能取代文档化良好的代码吗?
- 在erb中添加注释的最佳方法
- 为什么Python没有多行注释?
- 我应该在批处理文件中使用哪种注释风格?
- 如何在Office VBA编辑器中注释和取消注释代码块
- “# noqa”在Python注释中是什么意思?
- 我可以向pip需求文件添加注释吗?