设法把这个糟糕的双关语插入到我们的代码中

for (bo_thans = 0 ; bo_thans < MAX ; bo_thans++)
{
    if(rs == thing[bo_thans])
    {
       found = true;
    }
}

if(!found)
{
   /* Failed to find rs with bo_thans */
   ...
}

// StupidCompilerDontInline(SCDI), in the test project where
// allcode was in a single cpp the compiler had inlined nearly
// everything which lead to nice stackoverflow.
// To prevent this the metods are made virtual
#define SCDI virtual

不是代码注释，而是SVN在同一个文件上提交注释:

第一次提交(在测试人员返回结果后，再进行数十次提交):

Squashed some IPR mod bugs. The were big and juicy ones, too.

2日提交:

Squashed some more mod bugs. Those are some nasty bugs, them mod bugs...

3rd:

Squashed some more mod bugs. They are like cockroaches: they'll live through a nuclear war.

4th:

Squashed some more John bugs. They too are like cockroaches: they appear anywhere John goes. Wait. That doesn't sound right.

5:

Same John bug. It didn't die, just played 'possum.

是的，我厌倦了"修复bug"

这是一个旧的IOCCC获奖条目，我不得不下载整个获奖档案——一个巨大的1.4 M——和grep的几个短语，我记得错了才找到它。

从语法上看，这可能不是注释。或许是这样。我还没想明白。它肯定没有注释分隔符，但也没有字符串分隔符。

C="Lint says "argument Manual isn't used."  What's that
mean?";

没有价格来猜测棉绒的产量。

对于好奇的人来说，这个条目在这里。

/**---------START-----------**/

  //  IMPLEMENTATION GOES HERE

/**---------END-----------**/

但没有代码;)

REM Don't delete this print statement ****** will die

所讨论的流程是一些遗留代码中的服务