在我的应用程序中,我使用第三方库(Spring Data for MongoDB准确地说)。
这个库的方法返回Iterable<T>,而我的其余代码期望Collection<T>。
有没有什么实用的方法可以让我快速地把一个转换成另一个?为了这么简单的事情,我希望避免在代码中创建一堆foreach循环。
在我的应用程序中,我使用第三方库(Spring Data for MongoDB准确地说)。
这个库的方法返回Iterable<T>,而我的其余代码期望Collection<T>。
有没有什么实用的方法可以让我快速地把一个转换成另一个?为了这么简单的事情,我希望避免在代码中创建一堆foreach循环。
当前回答
如果您可以更新到Spring Data 3,那么这个问题已经解决了。有一个新的界面ListCrudRepository,它做的正是你想要的。
这是来自https://spring.io/blog/2022/02/22/announcing-listcrudrepository-friends-for-spring-data-3-0:的界面
public interface ListCrudRepository<T, ID> extends CrudRepository<T, ID> {
<S extends T> List<S> saveAll(Iterable<S> entities);
List<T> findAll();
List<T> findAllById(Iterable<ID> ids);
}
注意,在版本3中必须实现两个接口
所以在版本2中
public interface PersonRepository<Person, Long> extends
PagingAndSortingRepository<Person, Long> {}
在版本3中应改为:
public interface PersonRepository<Person, Long> extends
PagingAndSortingRepository<Person, Long>,ListCrudRepository<Person, Long> {}
其他变化见https://spring.io/blog/2022/02/22/announcing-listcrudrepository-friends-for-spring-data-3-0
其他回答
我经常使用fluentiatable .from(myIterable). tolist()。
With Guava you can use Lists.newArrayList(Iterable) or Sets.newHashSet(Iterable), among other similar methods. This will of course copy all the elements in to memory. If that isn't acceptable, I think your code that works with these ought to take Iterable rather than Collection. Guava also happens to provide convenient methods for doing things you can do on a Collection using an Iterable (such as Iterables.isEmpty(Iterable) or Iterables.contains(Iterable, Object)), but the performance implications are more obvious.
来自common -collections的IteratorUtils可能会有所帮助(尽管它们在最新的稳定版本3.2.1中不支持泛型):
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Collection<Type> list = IteratorUtils.toList(iterable.iterator());
4.0版本(目前在SNAPSHOT中)支持泛型,您可以去掉@SuppressWarnings。
更新:检查IterableAsList从仙人掌。
Java 8使用Java .util.stream的简洁解决方案:
public static <T> List<T> toList(final Iterable<T> iterable) {
return StreamSupport.stream(iterable.spliterator(), false)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
}
从Java 16开始,你可以使用Stream.toList():
public static <T> List<T> toList(final Iterable<T> iterable) {
return StreamSupport.stream(iterable.spliterator(), false)
.toList();
}
两个评论
There is no need to convert Iterable to Collection to use foreach loop - Iterable may be used in such loop directly, there is no syntactical difference, so I hardly understand why the original question was asked at all. Suggested way to convert Iterable to Collection is unsafe (the same relates to CollectionUtils) - there is no guarantee that subsequent calls to the next() method return different object instances. Moreover, this concern is not pure theoretical. E.g. Iterable implementation used to pass values to a reduce method of Hadoop Reducer always returns the same value instance, just with different field values. So if you apply makeCollection from above (or CollectionUtils.addAll(Iterator)) you will end up with a collection with all identical elements.