假设我们有两个堆栈，没有其他临时变量。
是否有可能“构造”一个队列数据结构只使用两个堆栈?
当前回答
使用O(1) dequeue()，这与pythonquick的答案相同:
// time: O(n), space: O(n)
enqueue(x):
if stack.isEmpty():
stack.push(x)
return
temp = stack.pop()
enqueue(x)
stack.push(temp)
// time: O(1)
x dequeue():
return stack.pop()
使用O(1) enqueue()(这在本文中没有提到，所以这个答案)，它也使用回溯来冒泡并返回最底部的项。
// O(1)
enqueue(x):
stack.push(x)
// time: O(n), space: O(n)
x dequeue():
temp = stack.pop()
if stack.isEmpty():
x = temp
else:
x = dequeue()
stack.push(temp)
return x
显然，这是一个很好的编码练习，因为它效率很低，但仍然很优雅。
其他回答
对于c#开发人员，这里是完整的程序:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace QueueImplimentationUsingStack
{
class Program
{
public class Stack<T>
{
public int size;
public Node<T> head;
public void Push(T data)
{
Node<T> node = new Node<T>();
node.data = data;
if (head == null)
head = node;
else
{
node.link = head;
head = node;
}
size++;
Display();
}
public Node<T> Pop()
{
if (head == null)
return null;
else
{
Node<T> temp = head;
//temp.link = null;
head = head.link;
size--;
Display();
return temp;
}
}
public void Display()
{
if (size == 0)
Console.WriteLine("Empty");
else
{
Console.Clear();
Node<T> temp = head;
while (temp!= null)
{
Console.WriteLine(temp.data);
temp = temp.link;
}
}
}
}
public class Queue<T>
{
public int size;
public Stack<T> inbox;
public Stack<T> outbox;
public Queue()
{
inbox = new Stack<T>();
outbox = new Stack<T>();
}
public void EnQueue(T data)
{
inbox.Push(data);
size++;
}
public Node<T> DeQueue()
{
if (outbox.size == 0)
{
while (inbox.size != 0)
{
outbox.Push(inbox.Pop().data);
}
}
Node<T> temp = new Node<T>();
if (outbox.size != 0)
{
temp = outbox.Pop();
size--;
}
return temp;
}
}
public class Node<T>
{
public T data;
public Node<T> link;
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Queue<int> q = new Queue<int>();
for (int i = 1; i <= 3; i++)
q.EnQueue(i);
// q.Display();
for (int i = 1; i < 3; i++)
q.DeQueue();
//q.Display();
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
}
简单的JS解决方案**
注:我从其他人的评论中获得了一些想法
/* enQueue(q, x) 1) Push x to stack1 (assuming size of stacks is unlimited). deQueue(q) 1) If both stacks are empty then error. 2) If stack2 is empty While stack1 is not empty, push everything from stack1 to stack2. 3) Pop the element from stack2 and return it. */ class myQueue { constructor() { this.stack1 = []; this.stack2 = []; } push(item) { this.stack1.push(item) } remove() { if (this.stack1.length == 0 && this.stack2.length == 0) { return "Stack are empty" } if (this.stack2.length == 0) { while (this.stack1.length != 0) { this.stack2.push(this.stack1.pop()) } } return this.stack2.pop() } peek() { if (this.stack2.length == 0 && this.stack1.length == 0) { return 'Empty list' } if (this.stack2.length == 0) { while (this.stack1.length != 0) { this.stack2.push(this.stack1.pop()) } } return this.stack2[0] } isEmpty() { return this.stack2.length === 0 && this.stack1.length === 0; } } const q = new myQueue(); q.push(1); q.push(2); q.push(3); q.remove() console.log(q)
使用O(1) dequeue()，这与pythonquick的答案相同:
// time: O(n), space: O(n)
enqueue(x):
if stack.isEmpty():
stack.push(x)
return
temp = stack.pop()
enqueue(x)
stack.push(temp)
// time: O(1)
x dequeue():
return stack.pop()
使用O(1) enqueue()(这在本文中没有提到，所以这个答案)，它也使用回溯来冒泡并返回最底部的项。
// O(1)
enqueue(x):
stack.push(x)
// time: O(n), space: O(n)
x dequeue():
temp = stack.pop()
if stack.isEmpty():
x = temp
else:
x = dequeue()
stack.push(temp)
return x
显然，这是一个很好的编码练习，因为它效率很低，但仍然很优雅。
队列中的两个堆栈定义为stack1和stack2。
排队: euqueued的元素总是被推入stack1
出列: stack2的顶部可以被弹出，因为它是在stack2不为空时插入队列的第一个元素。当stack2为空时，我们从stack1中弹出所有元素，并将它们逐个推入stack2。队列中的第一个元素被压入stack1的底部。由于它位于stack2的顶部，所以在弹出和推入操作后可以直接弹出。
下面是相同的c++示例代码:
template <typename T> class CQueue
{
public:
CQueue(void);
~CQueue(void);
void appendTail(const T& node);
T deleteHead();
private:
stack<T> stack1;
stack<T> stack2;
};
template<typename T> void CQueue<T>::appendTail(const T& element) {
stack1.push(element);
}
template<typename T> T CQueue<T>::deleteHead() {
if(stack2.size()<= 0) {
while(stack1.size()>0) {
T& data = stack1.top();
stack1.pop();
stack2.push(data);
}
}
if(stack2.size() == 0)
throw new exception("queue is empty");
T head = stack2.top();
stack2.pop();
return head;
}
这个解决方案是从我的博客中借来的。我的博客网页上有详细的操作模拟分析。
// Two stacks s1 Original and s2 as Temp one
private Stack<Integer> s1 = new Stack<Integer>();
private Stack<Integer> s2 = new Stack<Integer>();
/*
* Here we insert the data into the stack and if data all ready exist on
* stack than we copy the entire stack s1 to s2 recursively and push the new
* element data onto s1 and than again recursively call the s2 to pop on s1.
*
* Note here we can use either way ie We can keep pushing on s1 and than
* while popping we can remove the first element from s2 by copying
* recursively the data and removing the first index element.
*/
public void insert( int data )
{
if( s1.size() == 0 )
{
s1.push( data );
}
else
{
while( !s1.isEmpty() )
{
s2.push( s1.pop() );
}
s1.push( data );
while( !s2.isEmpty() )
{
s1.push( s2.pop() );
}
}
}
public void remove()
{
if( s1.isEmpty() )
{
System.out.println( "Empty" );
}
else
{
s1.pop();
}
}
