使用O(1) dequeue()，这与pythonquick的答案相同:

// time: O(n), space: O(n)
enqueue(x):
    if stack.isEmpty():
        stack.push(x)
        return
    temp = stack.pop()
    enqueue(x)
    stack.push(temp)

// time: O(1)
x dequeue():
    return stack.pop()

使用O(1) enqueue()(这在本文中没有提到，所以这个答案)，它也使用回溯来冒泡并返回最底部的项。

// O(1)
enqueue(x):
    stack.push(x)

// time: O(n), space: O(n)
x dequeue():
    temp = stack.pop()
    if stack.isEmpty():
        x = temp
    else:
        x = dequeue()
        stack.push(temp)
    return x

显然，这是一个很好的编码练习，因为它效率很低，但仍然很优雅。

您必须从第一个堆栈中取出所有元素来获取底部元素。然后在每次“出队列”操作时将它们都放回第二个堆栈。

c#中的解决方案

public class Queue<T> where T : class
{
    private Stack<T> input = new Stack<T>();
    private Stack<T> output = new Stack<T>();
    public void Enqueue(T t)
    {
        input.Push(t);
    }

    public T Dequeue()
    {
        if (output.Count == 0)
        {
            while (input.Count != 0)
            {
                output.Push(input.Pop());
            }
        }

        return output.Pop();
    }
}

在Swift中使用两个堆栈的队列实现:

struct Stack<Element> {
    var items = [Element]()

    var count : Int {
        return items.count
    }

    mutating func push(_ item: Element) {
        items.append(item)
    }

    mutating func pop() -> Element? {
        return items.removeLast()
    }

    func peek() -> Element? {
        return items.last
    }
}

struct Queue<Element> {
    var inStack = Stack<Element>()
    var outStack = Stack<Element>()

    mutating func enqueue(_ item: Element) {
        inStack.push(item)
    }

    mutating func dequeue() -> Element? {
        fillOutStack() 
        return outStack.pop()
    }

    mutating func peek() -> Element? {
        fillOutStack()
        return outStack.peek()
    }

    private mutating func fillOutStack() {
        if outStack.count == 0 {
            while inStack.count != 0 {
                outStack.push(inStack.pop()!)
            }
        }
    }
}

// Two stacks s1 Original and s2 as Temp one
    private Stack<Integer> s1 = new Stack<Integer>();
    private Stack<Integer> s2 = new Stack<Integer>();

    /*
     * Here we insert the data into the stack and if data all ready exist on
     * stack than we copy the entire stack s1 to s2 recursively and push the new
     * element data onto s1 and than again recursively call the s2 to pop on s1.
     * 
     * Note here we can use either way ie We can keep pushing on s1 and than
     * while popping we can remove the first element from s2 by copying
     * recursively the data and removing the first index element.
     */
    public void insert( int data )
    {
        if( s1.size() == 0 )
        {
            s1.push( data );
        }
        else
        {
            while( !s1.isEmpty() )
            {
                s2.push( s1.pop() );
            }
            s1.push( data );
            while( !s2.isEmpty() )
            {
                s1.push( s2.pop() );
            }
        }
    }

    public void remove()
    {
        if( s1.isEmpty() )
        {
            System.out.println( "Empty" );
        }
        else
        {
            s1.pop();

        }
    }

这是我的解决方案在Java使用链表。

class queue<T>{
    static class Node<T>{
        private T data;
        private Node<T> next;
        Node(T data){
            this.data = data;
            next = null;
        }
    }
    Node firstTop;
    Node secondTop;
    
    void push(T data){
        Node temp = new Node(data);
        temp.next = firstTop;
        firstTop = temp;
    }
    
    void pop(){
        if(firstTop == null){
            return;
        }
        Node temp = firstTop;
        while(temp != null){
            Node temp1 = new Node(temp.data);
            temp1.next = secondTop;
            secondTop = temp1;
            temp = temp.next;
        }
        secondTop = secondTop.next;
        firstTop = null;
        while(secondTop != null){
            Node temp3 = new Node(secondTop.data);
            temp3.next = firstTop;
            firstTop = temp3;
            secondTop = secondTop.next;
        }
    }
    
}

注意:在这种情况下，弹出操作非常耗时。因此，我不建议使用两个堆栈创建队列。