是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
当前回答
我知道这是老帖子了。但我想提出一个更合理、更简单的答案。
for(unsigned int i=0; i < 50; i++)
{
for(unsigned int j=0; j < conditionj; j++)
{
for(unsigned int k=0; k< conditionk ; k++)
{
// If condition is true
j= conditionj;
break;
}
}
}
其他回答
我知道这是老帖子了。但我想提出一个更合理、更简单的答案。
for(unsigned int i=0; i < 50; i++)
{
for(unsigned int j=0; j < conditionj; j++)
{
for(unsigned int k=0; k< conditionk ; k++)
{
// If condition is true
j= conditionj;
break;
}
}
}
Breaking out of a for-loop is a little strange to me, since the semantics of a for-loop typically indicate that it will execute a specified number of times. However, it's not bad in all cases; if you're searching for something in a collection and want to break after you find it, it's useful. Breaking out of nested loops, however, isn't possible in C++; it is in other languages through the use of a labeled break. You can use a label and a goto, but that might give you heartburn at night..? Seems like the best option though.
我的建议是使用一个检查变量来打破一个期望的循环。结果代码可能不那么令人愉快。 您可以使用预处理器,以便在引擎盖下进行所需的破坏。这种方法可以隐藏丑陋的代码和额外的复杂性。 例如,我创建了自定义中断机制,如下所示:
想要的代码:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
//do something
if (desiredCondition) {
breakToLevel = 0;
}
if (breakToLevel < 3) {
break;
}
}
if (breakToLevel < 2) {
break;
}
}
if (breakToLevel < 1) {
break;
}
}
宏定义:
#define BREAK_TO(L) breakToLevel = (L);
#define CHECK_BREAK(L) if (breakToLevel < (L)) break;
和结果:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
//do something
if (desiredCondition) {
BREAK_TO(0)
}
CHECK_BREAK(3)
}
CHECK_BREAK(2)
}
CHECK_BREAK(1)
}
打破嵌套循环的另一种方法是将两个循环分解成一个单独的函数,并在希望退出时从该函数返回。
当然,这也引发了另一个争论,即是否应该显式地从函数的任何地方返回,而不是在函数的末尾。
while (i<n) {
bool shouldBreakOuter = false;
for (int j=i + 1; j<n; ++j) {
if (someCondition) {
shouldBreakOuter = true;
}
}
if (shouldBreakOuter == true)
break;
}