是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
当前回答
你可以使用“goto”来留下嵌套循环 下面是我的原始代码,包括“goto”
int main()
{
string str;
while (cin >> str)
{
if (str == "0")
break;
int sum = 0;
for (auto ch : str)
{
if (ch <= 'z' && ch >= 'a')
sum += (ch - 'a' + 1);
else if (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z')
sum += (ch - 'A' + 1);
else
{
cout << "Fail" << endl;
goto fail;
}
}
cout << sum << endl;
fail:
}
return 0;
}
然而,我可以通过添加函数“计算”来避免“goto”
void calculate(const string &str)
{
int sum = 0;
for (auto ch : str)
{
if (ch <= 'z' && ch >= 'a')
sum += (ch - 'a' + 1);
else if (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'Z')
sum += (ch - 'A' + 1);
else
{
cout << "Fail" << endl;
return;
}
}
cout << sum << endl;
}
int main()
{
string str;
while (cin >> str)
{
if (str == "0")
break;
calculate(str);
}
return 0;
}
其他回答
while (i<n) {
bool shouldBreakOuter = false;
for (int j=i + 1; j<n; ++j) {
if (someCondition) {
shouldBreakOuter = true;
}
}
if (shouldBreakOuter == true)
break;
}
Break将只退出包含它的最内层循环。
你可以使用goto来跳出任意数量的循环。
当然,goto通常被认为是有害的。
使用break函数[…]是否合适?
使用break和goto会使判断程序的正确性变得更加困难。请看这里关于这个问题的讨论:Dijkstra不是疯子。
break语句终止它出现的最近的封闭do、for、switch或while语句的执行。控制权转移到终止语句后面的语句。
从msdn。
用一个bool变量打破任意数量的循环,如下所示:
bool check = true;
for (unsigned int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
{
for (unsigned int j = 0; j < 50; j++)
{
for (unsigned int k = 0; k < 50; k++)
{
//Some statement
if (condition)
{
check = false;
break;
}
}
if (!check)
{
break;
}
}
if (!check)
{
break;
}
}
在这段代码中,我们中断了;所有的循环。
Breaking out of a for-loop is a little strange to me, since the semantics of a for-loop typically indicate that it will execute a specified number of times. However, it's not bad in all cases; if you're searching for something in a collection and want to break after you find it, it's useful. Breaking out of nested loops, however, isn't possible in C++; it is in other languages through the use of a labeled break. You can use a label and a goto, but that might give you heartburn at night..? Seems like the best option though.