是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
是否可以使用break函数退出几个嵌套的for循环?
如果是,你会怎么做呢?你还能控制刹车出多少圈吗?
当前回答
只是使用lambdas添加一个显式的答案:
for (int i = 0; i < n1; ++i) {
[&] {
for (int j = 0; j < n2; ++j) {
for (int k = 0; k < n3; ++k) {
return; // yay we're breaking out of 2 loops here
}
}
}();
}
当然,这种模式有一定的局限性,显然只适用于c++ 11,但我认为它非常有用。
其他回答
我的建议是使用一个检查变量来打破一个期望的循环。结果代码可能不那么令人愉快。 您可以使用预处理器,以便在引擎盖下进行所需的破坏。这种方法可以隐藏丑陋的代码和额外的复杂性。 例如,我创建了自定义中断机制,如下所示:
想要的代码:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
//do something
if (desiredCondition) {
breakToLevel = 0;
}
if (breakToLevel < 3) {
break;
}
}
if (breakToLevel < 2) {
break;
}
}
if (breakToLevel < 1) {
break;
}
}
宏定义:
#define BREAK_TO(L) breakToLevel = (L);
#define CHECK_BREAK(L) if (breakToLevel < (L)) break;
和结果:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
for (int k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
//do something
if (desiredCondition) {
BREAK_TO(0)
}
CHECK_BREAK(3)
}
CHECK_BREAK(2)
}
CHECK_BREAK(1)
}
break语句终止它出现的最近的封闭do、for、switch或while语句的执行。控制权转移到终止语句后面的语句。
从msdn。
Breaking out of a for-loop is a little strange to me, since the semantics of a for-loop typically indicate that it will execute a specified number of times. However, it's not bad in all cases; if you're searching for something in a collection and want to break after you find it, it's useful. Breaking out of nested loops, however, isn't possible in C++; it is in other languages through the use of a labeled break. You can use a label and a goto, but that might give you heartburn at night..? Seems like the best option though.
Goto对于打破嵌套循环非常有用
for (i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 1000; j++) {
for (k = 0; k < 1000; k++) {
for (l = 0; l < 1000; l++){
....
if (condition)
goto break_me_here;
....
}
}
}
}
break_me_here:
// Statements to be executed after code breaks at if condition
虽然这个答案已经提出了,但我认为一个很好的方法是这样做:
for(unsigned int z = 0; z < z_max; z++)
{
bool gotoMainLoop = false;
for(unsigned int y = 0; y < y_max && !gotoMainLoop; y++)
{
for(unsigned int x = 0; x < x_max && !gotoMainLoop; x++)
{
//do your stuff
if(condition)
gotoMainLoop = true;
}
}
}