我需要在Java中连接两个字符串数组。
void f(String[] first, String[] second) {
String[] both = ???
}
哪种方法最简单?
我需要在Java中连接两个字符串数组。
void f(String[] first, String[] second) {
String[] both = ???
}
哪种方法最简单?
当前回答
public int[] mergeArrays(int [] a, int [] b) {
int [] merged = new int[a.length + b.length];
int i = 0, k = 0, l = a.length;
int j = a.length > b.length ? a.length : b.length;
while(i < j) {
if(k < a.length) {
merged[k] = a[k];
k++;
}
if((l - a.length) < b.length) {
merged[l] = b[l - a.length];
l++;
}
i++;
}
return merged;
}
其他回答
这里是silvertab解决方案的一个修改,对泛型进行了改进:
static <T> T[] concat(T[] a, T[] b) {
final int alen = a.length;
final int blen = b.length;
final T[] result = (T[]) java.lang.reflect.Array.
newInstance(a.getClass().getComponentType(), alen + blen);
System.arraycopy(a, 0, result, 0, alen);
System.arraycopy(b, 0, result, alen, blen);
return result;
}
注意:请参阅Joachim的Java 6解决方案答案。它不仅消除了警告;它也更短,更高效,更容易阅读!
FunctionalJava库有一个数组包装器类,它为数组提供了方便的方法,如串联。
import static fj.data.Array.array;
…然后
Array<String> both = array(first).append(array(second));
要取回展开的数组,请调用
String[] s = both.array();
这是字符串数组的转换函数:
public String[] mergeArrays(String[] mainArray, String[] addArray) {
String[] finalArray = new String[mainArray.length + addArray.length];
System.arraycopy(mainArray, 0, finalArray, 0, mainArray.length);
System.arraycopy(addArray, 0, finalArray, mainArray.length, addArray.length);
return finalArray;
}
我认为泛型的最佳解决方案是:
/* This for non primitive types */
public static <T> T[] concatenate (T[]... elements) {
T[] C = null;
for (T[] element: elements) {
if (element==null) continue;
if (C==null) C = (T[]) Array.newInstance(element.getClass().getComponentType(), element.length);
else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);
System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
}
return C;
}
/**
* as far as i know, primitive types do not accept generics
* http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2721546/why-dont-java-generics-support-primitive-types
* for primitive types we could do something like this:
* */
public static int[] concatenate (int[]... elements){
int[] C = null;
for (int[] element: elements) {
if (element==null) continue;
if (C==null) C = new int[element.length];
else C = resizeArray(C, C.length+element.length);
System.arraycopy(element, 0, C, C.length-element.length, element.length);
}
return C;
}
private static <T> T resizeArray (T array, int newSize) {
int oldSize =
java.lang.reflect.Array.getLength(array);
Class elementType =
array.getClass().getComponentType();
Object newArray =
java.lang.reflect.Array.newInstance(
elementType, newSize);
int preserveLength = Math.min(oldSize, newSize);
if (preserveLength > 0)
System.arraycopy(array, 0,
newArray, 0, preserveLength);
return (T) newArray;
}
我最近一直在与过度的记忆循环作斗争。如果已知a和/或b通常是空的,这里是silvertab代码的另一种修改(也被通用化):
private static <T> T[] concatOrReturnSame(T[] a, T[] b) {
final int alen = a.length;
final int blen = b.length;
if (alen == 0) {
return b;
}
if (blen == 0) {
return a;
}
final T[] result = (T[]) java.lang.reflect.Array.
newInstance(a.getClass().getComponentType(), alen + blen);
System.arraycopy(a, 0, result, 0, alen);
System.arraycopy(b, 0, result, alen, blen);
return result;
}
编辑:这篇文章的前一个版本指出,像这样的数组重用应该清楚地记录下来。正如Maarten在评论中指出的那样,一般来说,最好删除if语句,这样就不需要文档了。但话说回来,那些if语句首先就是这个特定优化的要点。我会在这里留下这个答案,但要小心!