这一个只适用于int，但想法是通用的

public static int[] junta(int[] v, int[] w) {

int[] junta = new int[v.length + w.length];

for (int i = 0; i < v.length; i++) {            
    junta[i] = v[i];
}

for (int j = v.length; j < junta.length; j++) {
    junta[j] = w[j - v.length];
}

算法爱好者的另一个答案是：

public static String[] mergeArrays(String[] array1, String[] array2) {
    int totalSize = array1.length + array2.length; // Get total size
    String[] merged = new String[totalSize]; // Create new array
    // Loop over the total size
    for (int i = 0; i < totalSize; i++) {
        if (i < array1.length) // If the current position is less than the length of the first array, take value from first array
            merged[i] = array1[i]; // Position in first array is the current position

        else // If current position is equal or greater than the first array, take value from second array.
            merged[i] = array2[i - array1.length]; // Position in second array is current position minus length of first array.
    }

    return merged;

用法：

String[] array1str = new String[]{"a", "b", "c", "d"}; 
String[] array2str = new String[]{"e", "f", "g", "h", "i"};
String[] listTotalstr = mergeArrays(array1str, array2str);
System.out.println(Arrays.toString(listTotalstr));

结果：

[a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i]

我发现我必须处理数组可以为空的情况。。。

private double[] concat  (double[]a,double[]b){
    if (a == null) return b;
    if (b == null) return a;
    double[] r = new double[a.length+b.length];
    System.arraycopy(a, 0, r, 0, a.length);
    System.arraycopy(b, 0, r, a.length, b.length);
    return r;

}
private double[] copyRest (double[]a, int start){
    if (a == null) return null;
    if (start > a.length)return null;
    double[]r = new double[a.length-start];
    System.arraycopy(a,start,r,0,a.length-start); 
    return r;
}

public String[] concat(String[]... arrays)
{
    int length = 0;
    for (String[] array : arrays) {
        length += array.length;
    }
    String[] result = new String[length];
    int destPos = 0;
    for (String[] array : arrays) {
        System.arraycopy(array, 0, result, destPos, array.length);
        destPos += array.length;
    }
    return result;
}

我最近一直在与过度的记忆循环作斗争。如果已知a和/或b通常是空的，这里是silvertab代码的另一种修改（也被通用化）：

private static <T> T[] concatOrReturnSame(T[] a, T[] b) {
    final int alen = a.length;
    final int blen = b.length;
    if (alen == 0) {
        return b;
    }
    if (blen == 0) {
        return a;
    }
    final T[] result = (T[]) java.lang.reflect.Array.
            newInstance(a.getClass().getComponentType(), alen + blen);
    System.arraycopy(a, 0, result, 0, alen);
    System.arraycopy(b, 0, result, alen, blen);
    return result;
}

编辑：这篇文章的前一个版本指出，像这样的数组重用应该清楚地记录下来。正如Maarten在评论中指出的那样，一般来说，最好删除if语句，这样就不需要文档了。但话说回来，那些if语句首先就是这个特定优化的要点。我会在这里留下这个答案，但要小心！

一个100%旧的java和没有System.arraycopy的解决方案（例如GWT客户端中不可用）：

static String[] concat(String[]... arrays) {
    int length = 0;
    for (String[] array : arrays) {
        length += array.length;
    }
    String[] result = new String[length];
    int pos = 0;
    for (String[] array : arrays) {
        for (String element : array) {
            result[pos] = element;
            pos++;
        }
    }
    return result;
}