我在纯JS中尝试了一下，想知道上面发布的插件是如何完成这项工作的。这是我的结果。首先我要说的是，我不知道这在IE和类似的软件中会有多稳定。这只是一个快速的模型。

init(); function init() { var one = [0, 1, 2, 3]; var two = [4, 5, 6, 7]; var three = [8, 9, 10, 11, 12]; var four = zip(one, two, one); //returns array //four = zip(one, two, three); //returns false since three.length !== two.length console.log(four); } function zip() { for (var i = 0; i < arguments.length; i++) { if (!arguments[i].length || !arguments.toString()) { return false; } if (i >= 1) { if (arguments[i].length !== arguments[i - 1].length) { return false; } } } var zipped = []; for (var j = 0; j < arguments[0].length; j++) { var toBeZipped = []; for (var k = 0; k < arguments.length; k++) { toBeZipped.push(arguments[k][j]); } zipped.push(toBeZipped); } return zipped; }

虽然不是无懈可击，但还是很有趣。

没有等价的函数。如果你只有几个数组，你应该使用for循环获取一个索引，然后使用索引访问数组:

var array1 = [1, 2, 3];
var array2 = ['a','b','c'];

for (let i = 0; i < Math.min(array1.length, array2.length); i++) {
    doStuff(array1[i], array2[i]);
}

如果你有更多的数组，你可以在数组上有一个内循环。

这将从Ddi基于迭代器的答案中删除一行:

function* zip(...toZip) {
  const iterators = toZip.map((arg) => arg[Symbol.iterator]());
  const next = () => toZip = iterators.map((iter) => iter.next());
  while (next().every((item) => !item.done)) {
    yield toZip.map((item) => item.value);
  }
}

不是Javascript本身内置的。一些常见的Javascript框架(如Prototype)提供了一个实现，或者你也可以自己编写。

除了ninjagecko出色而全面的回答外，将两个js数组压缩成“元组模拟”所需要的是:

//Arrays: aIn, aOut
Array.prototype.map.call( aIn, function(e,i){return [e, aOut[i]];})

Explanation: Since Javascript doesn't have a tuples type, functions for tuples, lists and sets wasn't a high priority in the language specification. Otherwise, similar behavior is accessible in a straightforward manner via Array map in JS >1.6. (map is actually often implemented by JS engine makers in many >JS 1.4 engines, despite not specified). The major difference to Python's zip, izip,... results from map's functional style, since map requires a function-argument. Additionally it is a function of the Array-instance. One may use Array.prototype.map instead, if an extra declaration for the input is an issue.

例子:

_tarrin = [0..constructor, function(){}, false, undefined, '', 100, 123.324,
         2343243243242343242354365476453654625345345, 'sdf23423dsfsdf',
         'sdf2324.234dfs','234,234fsf','100,100','100.100']
_parseInt = function(i){return parseInt(i);}
_tarrout = _tarrin.map(_parseInt)
_tarrin.map(function(e,i,a){return [e, _tarrout[i]]})

结果:

//'('+_tarrin.map(function(e,i,a){return [e, _tarrout[i]]}).join('),\n(')+')'
>>
(function Number() { [native code] },NaN),
(function (){},NaN),
(false,NaN),
(,NaN),
(,NaN),
(100,100),
(123.324,123),
(2.3432432432423434e+42,2),
(sdf23423dsfsdf,NaN),
(sdf2324.234dfs,NaN),
(234,234fsf,234),
(100,100,100),
(100.100,100)

相关的性能:

使用map over for loops:

请参阅:将[1,2]和[7,8]合并为[[1,7]，[2,8]的最有效方法是什么

注意:基本类型如false和undefined不具有原型对象层次结构，因此不公开toString函数。因此，这些在输出中显示为空。 由于parseInt的第二个参数是基数/数字基数，要将数字转换为基数/数字基数，并且由于map将索引作为第二个参数传递给它的参数函数，因此使用包装器函数。

与其他类似Python的函数一样，pythonic提供了一个zip函数，其额外的好处是返回一个惰性求值迭代器，类似于Python对应的行为:

import {zip, zipLongest} from 'pythonic';

const arr1 = ['a', 'b'];
const arr2 = ['c', 'd', 'e'];
for (const [first, second] of zip(arr1, arr2))
    console.log(`first: ${first}, second: ${second}`);
// first: a, second: c
// first: b, second: d

for (const [first, second] of zipLongest(arr1, arr2))
    console.log(`first: ${first}, second: ${second}`);
// first: a, second: c
// first: b, second: d
// first: undefined, second: e

// unzip
const [arrayFirst, arraySecond] = [...zip(...zip(arr1, arr2))];

我是Pythonic的作者和维护者