我在一个低级名称空间中有一个枚举。我想在中层名称空间中提供一个“继承”低层枚举的类或枚举。
namespace low
{
public enum base
{
x, y, z
}
}
namespace mid
{
public enum consume : low.base
{
}
}
我希望这是可能的，或者可能有某种类可以取代枚举消费，这将为枚举提供一个抽象层，但仍然让该类的实例访问枚举。
想法吗?
编辑: 我没有在类中将其转换为const的原因之一是我必须使用的服务需要低级枚举。我已经获得了wsdl和xsd，它们将结构定义为枚举。该服务不可更改。
当前回答
枚举不能从其他枚举派生，只能从int、uint、short、ushort、long、ulong、byte和sbyte派生。
就像Pascal说的，你可以使用其他枚举的值或常量来初始化一个枚举值，但仅此而已。
其他回答
这样做的方法(如果有必要的话)是实现自己的类结构，其中包括您希望从继承枚举的概念中获得的特性，而且您还可以添加更多特性。 您只需实现相等比较器和函数来查找您自己编写的值。 您可以将构造函数设为私有，并声明类和任何子类的静态实例。 或者为您的问题找到一个简单的解决方法，并坚持使用本机枚举实现。
继承枚举的重代码实现:
/// <summary>
/// Generic Design for implementing inheritable enum
/// </summary>
public class ServiceBase
{
//members
protected int _id;
protected string _name;
//constructors
private ServiceBase(int id, string name)
{
_id = id;
_name = name;
}
//onlu required if subclassing
protected ServiceBase(int id, string name, bool isSubClass = true )
{
if( id <= _maxServiceId )
throw new InvalidProgramException("Bad Id in ServiceBase" );
_id = id;
_name = name;
}
//members
public int Id => _id;
public string Name => _name;
public virtual ServiceBase getService(int serviceBaseId)
{
return ALLBASESERVICES.SingleOrDefault(s => s.Id == _id);
}
//implement iComparable if required
//static methods
public static ServiceBase getServiceOrDefault(int serviceBaseId)
{
return SERVICE1.getService(serviceBaseId);
}
//Enumerations Here
public static ServiceBase SERVICE1 = new ServiceBase( 1, "First Service" );
public static ServiceBase SERVICE2 = new ServiceBase( 2, "Second Service" );
protected static ServiceBase[] ALLBASESERVICES =
{
//Enumerations list
SERVICE1,
SERVICE2
};
private static int _maxServiceId = ALLBASESERVICES.Max( s => s.Id );
//only required if subclassing
protected static ServiceBase[] combineServices(ServiceBase[] array1, ServiceBase[] array2)
{
List<ServiceBase> serviceBases = new List<ServiceBase>();
serviceBases.AddRange( array1 );
serviceBases.AddRange( array2 );
return serviceBases.ToArray();
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Generic Design for implementing inheritable enum
/// </summary>
public class ServiceJobs : ServiceBase
{
//constructor
private ServiceJobs(int id, string name)
: base( id, name )
{
_id = id;
_name = name;
}
//only required if subclassing
protected ServiceJobs(int id, string name, bool isSubClass = true )
: base( id, name )
{
if( id <= _maxServiceId )
throw new InvalidProgramException("Bad Id in ServiceJobs" );
_id = id;
_name = name;
}
//members
public override ServiceBase getService(int serviceBaseId)
{
if (ALLSERVICES == null)
{
ALLSERVICES = combineServices(ALLBASESERVICES, ALLJOBSERVICES);
}
return ALLSERVICES.SingleOrDefault(s => s.Id == _id);
}
//static methods
public static ServiceBase getServiceOrDefault(int serviceBaseId)
{
return SERVICE3.getService(serviceBaseId);
}
//sub class services here
public static ServiceBase SERVICE3 = new ServiceJobs( 3, "Third Service" );
public static ServiceBase SERVICE4 = new ServiceJobs( 4, "Forth Service" );
private static int _maxServiceId = ALLJOBSERVICES.Max( s => s.Id );
private static ServiceBase[] ALLJOBSERVICES =
{
//subclass service list
SERVICE3,
SERVICE4
};
//all services including superclass items
private static ServiceBase[] ALLSERVICES = null;
}
注意，您可以使用枚举而不是int作为id，尽管子类需要一个单独的枚举。 枚举类本身可以用各种标志、消息、函数等来装饰。 泛型实现将减少大量代码。
This is what I did. What I've done differently is use the same name and the new keyword on the "consuming" enum. Since the name of the enum is the same, you can just mindlessly use it and it will be right. Plus you get intellisense. You just have to manually take care when setting it up that the values are copied over from the base and keep them sync'ed. You can help that along with code comments. This is another reason why in the database when storing enum values I always store the string, not the value. Because if you are using automatically assigned increasing integer values those can change over time.
// Base Class for balls
public class Ball
{
// keep synced with subclasses!
public enum Sizes
{
Small,
Medium,
Large
}
}
public class VolleyBall : Ball
{
// keep synced with base class!
public new enum Sizes
{
Small = Ball.Sizes.Small,
Medium = Ball.Sizes.Medium,
Large = Ball.Sizes.Large,
SmallMedium,
MediumLarge,
Ginormous
}
}
我还想重载枚举，并在本页上创建了“七个”的答案和“梅林摩根-格雷厄姆”的答案的混合，再加上一些改进。 我的解决方案相对于其他解决方案的主要优势:
基础int值的自动递增 自动命名
这是一个开箱即用的解决方案，可以直接插入到您的项目中。它是根据我的需要设计的，所以如果你不喜欢它的某些部分，只需用你自己的代码替换它们。
首先，有一个基类CEnum，所有自定义枚举都应该继承它。它有基本的功能，类似于。net Enum类型:
public class CEnum
{
protected static readonly int msc_iUpdateNames = int.MinValue;
protected static int ms_iAutoValue = -1;
protected static List<int> ms_listiValue = new List<int>();
public int Value
{
get;
protected set;
}
public string Name
{
get;
protected set;
}
protected CEnum ()
{
CommonConstructor (-1);
}
protected CEnum (int i_iValue)
{
CommonConstructor (i_iValue);
}
public static string[] GetNames (IList<CEnum> i_listoValue)
{
if (i_listoValue == null)
return null;
string[] asName = new string[i_listoValue.Count];
for (int ixCnt = 0; ixCnt < asName.Length; ixCnt++)
asName[ixCnt] = i_listoValue[ixCnt]?.Name;
return asName;
}
public static CEnum[] GetValues ()
{
return new CEnum[0];
}
protected virtual void CommonConstructor (int i_iValue)
{
if (i_iValue == msc_iUpdateNames)
{
UpdateNames (this.GetType ());
return;
}
else if (i_iValue > ms_iAutoValue)
ms_iAutoValue = i_iValue;
else
i_iValue = ++ms_iAutoValue;
if (ms_listiValue.Contains (i_iValue))
throw new ArgumentException ("duplicate value " + i_iValue.ToString ());
Value = i_iValue;
ms_listiValue.Add (i_iValue);
}
private static void UpdateNames (Type i_oType)
{
if (i_oType == null)
return;
FieldInfo[] aoFieldInfo = i_oType.GetFields (BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Static);
foreach (FieldInfo oFieldInfo in aoFieldInfo)
{
CEnum oEnumResult = oFieldInfo.GetValue (null) as CEnum;
if (oEnumResult == null)
continue;
oEnumResult.Name = oFieldInfo.Name;
}
}
}
其次，这里有2个派生的Enum类。所有派生类都需要一些基本方法才能正常工作。它总是相同的样板代码;我还没有找到将它外包给基类的方法。继承的第一级的代码与所有后续级略有不同。
public class CEnumResult : CEnum
{
private static List<CEnumResult> ms_listoValue = new List<CEnumResult>();
public static readonly CEnumResult Nothing = new CEnumResult ( 0);
public static readonly CEnumResult SUCCESS = new CEnumResult ( 1);
public static readonly CEnumResult UserAbort = new CEnumResult ( 11);
public static readonly CEnumResult InProgress = new CEnumResult (101);
public static readonly CEnumResult Pausing = new CEnumResult (201);
private static readonly CEnumResult Dummy = new CEnumResult (msc_iUpdateNames);
protected CEnumResult () : base ()
{
}
protected CEnumResult (int i_iValue) : base (i_iValue)
{
}
protected override void CommonConstructor (int i_iValue)
{
base.CommonConstructor (i_iValue);
if (i_iValue == msc_iUpdateNames)
return;
if (this.GetType () == System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod ().DeclaringType)
ms_listoValue.Add (this);
}
public static new CEnumResult[] GetValues ()
{
List<CEnumResult> listoValue = new List<CEnumResult> ();
listoValue.AddRange (ms_listoValue);
return listoValue.ToArray ();
}
}
public class CEnumResultClassCommon : CEnumResult
{
private static List<CEnumResultClassCommon> ms_listoValue = new List<CEnumResultClassCommon>();
public static readonly CEnumResult Error_InternalProgramming = new CEnumResultClassCommon (1000);
public static readonly CEnumResult Error_Initialization = new CEnumResultClassCommon ();
public static readonly CEnumResult Error_ObjectNotInitialized = new CEnumResultClassCommon ();
public static readonly CEnumResult Error_DLLMissing = new CEnumResultClassCommon ();
// ... many more
private static readonly CEnumResult Dummy = new CEnumResultClassCommon (msc_iUpdateNames);
protected CEnumResultClassCommon () : base ()
{
}
protected CEnumResultClassCommon (int i_iValue) : base (i_iValue)
{
}
protected override void CommonConstructor (int i_iValue)
{
base.CommonConstructor (i_iValue);
if (i_iValue == msc_iUpdateNames)
return;
if (this.GetType () == System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod ().DeclaringType)
ms_listoValue.Add (this);
}
public static new CEnumResult[] GetValues ()
{
List<CEnumResult> listoValue = new List<CEnumResult> (CEnumResult.GetValues ());
listoValue.AddRange (ms_listoValue);
return listoValue.ToArray ();
}
}
这些类已经通过以下代码成功测试:
private static void Main (string[] args)
{
CEnumResult oEnumResult = CEnumResultClassCommon.Error_Initialization;
string sName = oEnumResult.Name; // sName = "Error_Initialization"
CEnum[] aoEnumResult = CEnumResultClassCommon.GetValues (); // aoEnumResult = {testCEnumResult.Program.CEnumResult[9]}
string[] asEnumNames = CEnum.GetNames (aoEnumResult);
int ixValue = Array.IndexOf (aoEnumResult, oEnumResult); // ixValue = 6
}
这是不可能的。枚举不能从其他枚举继承。事实上，所有枚举都必须从System.Enum继承。c#允许语法改变枚举值的底层表示，这看起来像继承，但实际上它们仍然继承自System.enum。
详细信息请参见CLI规范的8.5.2节。来自规范的相关信息
所有枚举必须从System派生。枚举 因此，所有枚举都是值类型，因此是密封的
简短的回答是否定的。如果你想，你可以玩一点:
你可以这样做:
private enum Base
{
A,
B,
C
}
private enum Consume
{
A = Base.A,
B = Base.B,
C = Base.C,
D,
E
}
但是，它并没有那么好，因为Base。A !=消费。一个
不过，你总是可以这样做:
public static class Extensions
{
public static T As<T>(this Consume c) where T : struct
{
return (T)System.Enum.Parse(typeof(T), c.ToString(), false);
}
}
为了在基础和消费之间交叉…
你也可以将枚举的值转换为整数，并将它们比较为整数而不是enum，但这也很糟糕。
扩展方法return应该将其类型转换为T类型。
