我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
我想做一些事情,比如:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj(); // Create and fill a new object
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
然后对未反映在原始对象中的新对象进行更改。
我通常不需要这个功能,所以当有必要时,我会创建一个新对象,然后单独复制每个属性,但这总是让我觉得有更好或更优雅的方法来处理这种情况。
如何克隆或深度复制对象,以便在原始对象中不反映任何更改的情况下修改克隆的对象?
当前回答
在一个方法中重铸怎么样基本上应该调用自动复制构造函数
T t = new T();
T t2 = (T)t; //eh something like that
List<myclass> cloneum;
public void SomeFuncB(ref List<myclass> _mylist)
{
cloneum = new List<myclass>();
cloneum = (List < myclass >) _mylist;
cloneum.Add(new myclass(3));
_mylist = new List<myclass>();
}
似乎对我有用
其他回答
深度克隆就是复制状态。对于.net state,表示字段。
假设有一个层次结构:
static class RandomHelper
{
private static readonly Random random = new Random();
public static int Next(int maxValue) => random.Next(maxValue);
}
class A
{
private readonly int random = RandomHelper.Next(100);
public override string ToString() => $"{typeof(A).Name}.{nameof(random)} = {random}";
}
class B : A
{
private readonly int random = RandomHelper.Next(100);
public override string ToString() => $"{typeof(B).Name}.{nameof(random)} = {random} {base.ToString()}";
}
class C : B
{
private readonly int random = RandomHelper.Next(100);
public override string ToString() => $"{typeof(C).Name}.{nameof(random)} = {random} {base.ToString()}";
}
克隆可以通过以下方式完成:
static class DeepCloneExtension
{
// consider instance fields, both public and non-public
private static readonly BindingFlags bindingFlags =
BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance;
public static T DeepClone<T>(this T obj) where T : new()
{
var type = obj.GetType();
var result = (T)Activator.CreateInstance(type);
do
// copy all fields
foreach (var field in type.GetFields(bindingFlags))
field.SetValue(result, field.GetValue(obj));
// for every level of hierarchy
while ((type = type.BaseType) != typeof(object));
return result;
}
}
演示1:
Console.WriteLine(new C());
Console.WriteLine(new C());
var c = new C();
Console.WriteLine($"{Environment.NewLine}Image: {c}{Environment.NewLine}");
Console.WriteLine(new C());
Console.WriteLine(new C());
Console.WriteLine($"{Environment.NewLine}Clone: {c.DeepClone()}{Environment.NewLine}");
Console.WriteLine(new C());
Console.WriteLine(new C());
结果:
C.random = 92 B.random = 66 A.random = 71
C.random = 36 B.random = 64 A.random = 17
Image: C.random = 96 B.random = 18 A.random = 46
C.random = 60 B.random = 7 A.random = 37
C.random = 78 B.random = 11 A.random = 18
Clone: C.random = 96 B.random = 18 A.random = 46
C.random = 33 B.random = 63 A.random = 38
C.random = 4 B.random = 5 A.random = 79
注意,所有新对象的随机字段都有随机值,但克隆与图像完全匹配
演示2:
class D
{
public event EventHandler Event;
public void RaiseEvent() => Event?.Invoke(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
// ...
var image = new D();
Console.WriteLine($"Created obj #{image.GetHashCode()}");
image.Event += (sender, e) => Console.WriteLine($"Event from obj #{sender.GetHashCode()}");
Console.WriteLine($"Subscribed to event of obj #{image.GetHashCode()}");
image.RaiseEvent();
image.RaiseEvent();
var clone = image.DeepClone();
Console.WriteLine($"obj #{image.GetHashCode()} cloned to obj #{clone.GetHashCode()}");
clone.RaiseEvent();
image.RaiseEvent();
结果:
Created obj #46104728
Subscribed to event of obj #46104728
Event from obj #46104728
Event from obj #46104728
obj #46104728 cloned to obj #12289376
Event from obj #12289376
Event from obj #46104728
注意,事件支持字段也被复制,客户端也订阅了克隆的事件。
好的,这篇文章中有一些明显的反射示例,但反射通常很慢,直到你开始正确缓存它。
如果你能正确缓存它,那么它将以4.6s的速度深度克隆1000000个对象(由Watcher测量)。
static readonly Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]> ProperyList = new Dictionary<Type, PropertyInfo[]>();
而不是获取缓存的财产或将新属性添加到字典并简单使用它们
foreach (var prop in propList)
{
var value = prop.GetValue(source, null);
prop.SetValue(copyInstance, value, null);
}
在另一个答案中查看我的帖子中的完整代码
https://stackoverflow.com/a/34365709/4711853
对于克隆过程,可以先将对象转换为字节数组,然后再转换回对象。
public static class Extentions
{
public static T Clone<T>(this T obj)
{
byte[] buffer = BinarySerialize(obj);
return (T)BinaryDeserialize(buffer);
}
public static byte[] BinarySerialize(object obj)
{
using (var stream = new MemoryStream())
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
formatter.Serialize(stream, obj);
return stream.ToArray();
}
}
public static object BinaryDeserialize(byte[] buffer)
{
using (var stream = new MemoryStream(buffer))
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
return formatter.Deserialize(stream);
}
}
}
必须为序列化进程序列化对象。
[Serializable]
public class MyObject
{
public string Name { get; set; }
}
用法:
MyObject myObj = GetMyObj();
MyObject newObj = myObj.Clone();
我知道,这个问题和答案在这里停留了一段时间,下面不是很好的答案,而是观察,最近我在检查是否确实没有克隆隐私(如果没有,我就不会是我自己了;)时,我很高兴地复制了粘贴的@johnc更新的答案。
我简单地制作了自己的扩展方法(这几乎是上述答案的复制粘贴):
public static class CloneThroughJsonExtension
{
private static readonly JsonSerializerSettings DeserializeSettings = new JsonSerializerSettings { ObjectCreationHandling = ObjectCreationHandling.Replace };
public static T CloneThroughJson<T>(this T source)
{
return ReferenceEquals(source, null) ? default(T) : JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<T>(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(source), DeserializeSettings);
}
}
并天真地放弃了这样的课程(事实上,有更多这样的课程,但它们是无关的):
public class WhatTheHeck
{
public string PrivateSet { get; private set; } // matches ctor param name
public string GetOnly { get; } // matches ctor param name
private readonly string _indirectField;
public string Indirect => $"Inception of: {_indirectField} "; // matches ctor param name
public string RealIndirectFieldVaule => _indirectField;
public WhatTheHeck(string privateSet, string getOnly, string indirect)
{
PrivateSet = privateSet;
GetOnly = getOnly;
_indirectField = indirect;
}
}
代码如下:
var clone = new WhatTheHeck("Private-Set-Prop cloned!", "Get-Only-Prop cloned!", "Indirect-Field clonned!").CloneThroughJson();
Console.WriteLine($"1. {clone.PrivateSet}");
Console.WriteLine($"2. {clone.GetOnly}");
Console.WriteLine($"3.1. {clone.Indirect}");
Console.WriteLine($"3.2. {clone.RealIndirectFieldVaule}");
结果是:
1. Private-Set-Prop cloned!
2. Get-Only-Prop cloned!
3.1. Inception of: Inception of: Indirect-Field cloned!
3.2. Inception of: Indirect-Field cloned!
我整个人都在想:什么……所以我抓起Newtonsoft.Json Github repo,开始挖掘。结果是:当反序列化一个恰好只有一个ctor且其参数名匹配(不区分大小写)公共属性名的类型时,它们将作为这些参数传递给ctor。在这里和这里的代码中可以找到一些线索。
要旨
我知道这不是很常见的情况,示例代码有点滥用,但嘿!当我检查灌木丛中是否有龙在等着跳出来咬我的屁股时,我大吃一惊;)
通常,您实现ICloneable接口并自己实现克隆。C#对象有一个内置的MemberwiseColone方法,该方法执行浅层复制,可以帮助您处理所有原语。
对于深度复制,它无法知道如何自动执行。