删除不存在的事件处理程序不会造成任何损害。因此，如果您知道可能存在哪些处理程序，您可以简单地删除它们。我刚遇到过类似的情况。这在某些情况下可能会有帮助。

如:

// Add handlers...
if (something)
{
    c.Click += DoesSomething;
}
else
{
    c.Click += DoesSomethingElse;
}

// Remove handlers...
c.Click -= DoesSomething;
c.Click -= DoesSomethingElse;

斯蒂芬是对的。这很简单:

public event EventHandler<Cles_graph_doivent_etre_redessines> les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines;
public void remove_event()
{
    if (this.les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines != null)
    {
        foreach (EventHandler<Cles_graph_doivent_etre_redessines> F_les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines in this.les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines.GetInvocationList())
        {
            this.les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines -= F_les_graph_doivent_etre_redessines;
        }
    }
}

实际上我在用这个方法，效果很好。我受到了Aeonhack写的代码的“启发”。

    Public Event MyEvent()
    Protected Overrides Sub Dispose(ByVal disposing As Boolean)
        If MyEventEvent IsNot Nothing Then
            For Each d In MyEventEvent.GetInvocationList ' If this throws an exception, try using .ToArray
                RemoveHandler MyEvent, d
            Next
        End If
    End Sub

    ~MyClass()
    {
        if (MyEventEvent != null)
        {
            foreach (var d in MyEventEvent.GetInvocationList())
            {
                MyEventEvent -= (MyEvent)d;
            }
        }

    }

字段MyEventEvent是隐藏的，但它确实存在。

调试过程中，你可以看到d.t target是如何实际处理事件的对象，而d.m ode是如何处理事件的方法。你只需要把它拿掉。

效果很好。不再有对象因为事件处理程序而被GC。

我在MSDN论坛上找到了一个解决方案。下面的示例代码将删除button1中的所有Click事件。

public partial class Form1 : Form
{
    public Form1()
    {
        InitializeComponent();

        button1.Click += button1_Click;
        button1.Click += button1_Click2;
        button2.Click += button2_Click;
    }

    private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)  => MessageBox.Show("Hello");
    private void button1_Click2(object sender, EventArgs e) => MessageBox.Show("World");
    private void button2_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)  => RemoveClickEvent(button1);

    private void RemoveClickEvent(Button b)
    {
        FieldInfo f1 = typeof(Control).GetField("EventClick", 
            BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.NonPublic);

        object obj = f1.GetValue(b);
        PropertyInfo pi = b.GetType().GetProperty("Events",  
            BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance);

        EventHandlerList list = (EventHandlerList)pi.GetValue(b, null);
        list.RemoveHandler(obj, list[obj]);
    }
}

接受的答案不完整。对于声明为{add;删除;}

下面是工作代码:

public static void ClearEventInvocations(this object obj, string eventName)
{
    var fi = obj.GetType().GetEventField(eventName);
    if (fi == null) return;
    fi.SetValue(obj, null);
}

private static FieldInfo GetEventField(this Type type, string eventName)
{
    FieldInfo field = null;
    while (type != null)
    {
        /* Find events defined as field */
        field = type.GetField(eventName, BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
        if (field != null && (field.FieldType == typeof(MulticastDelegate) || field.FieldType.IsSubclassOf(typeof(MulticastDelegate))))
            break;

        /* Find events defined as property { add; remove; } */
        field = type.GetField("EVENT_" + eventName.ToUpper(), BindingFlags.Static | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
        if (field != null)
            break;
        type = type.BaseType;
    }
    return field;
}

从删除所有事件处理程序:

Directly no, in large part because you cannot simply set the event to null. Indirectly, you could make the actual event private and create a property around it that tracks all of the delegates being added/subtracted to it. Take the following: List<EventHandler> delegates = new List<EventHandler>(); private event EventHandler MyRealEvent; public event EventHandler MyEvent { add { MyRealEvent += value; delegates.Add(value); } remove { MyRealEvent -= value; delegates.Remove(value); } } public void RemoveAllEvents() { foreach(EventHandler eh in delegates) { MyRealEvent -= eh; } delegates.Clear(); }