ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
ECMAScript 6 引入了许可声明。
我听说它被描述为一个当地变量,但我仍然不确定它是如何行为不同于 var 关键词。
什么是差异?什么时候应该被允许使用而不是 var?
当前回答
在 MDN 中查看此链接
let x = 1;
if (x === 1) {
let x = 2;
console.log(x);
// expected output: 2
}
console.log(x);
// expected output: 1
其他回答
下面是让关键词的解释,有几个例子。
主要区别在于,一个变量的范围是整个关闭功能。
此图在维基百科上显示哪些浏览器支持JavaScript 1.7.
请注意,只有 Mozilla 和 Chrome 浏览器支持它. IE、Safari 和其他可能不支持它。
我想将这些关键词链接到执行背景,因为执行背景在这一切中都很重要。执行背景有两个阶段:创作阶段和执行阶段。
在创建阶段的执行背景, var, let 和 const 将仍然存储其变量在记忆中与未确定的值在该执行背景的变量环境中. 差异在执行阶段. 如果您使用参考一个变量定义为 var 之前它被分配一个值,它将只是不确定的。
function a(){
b;
let b;
}
a();
> Uncaught ReferenceError: b is not defined
有一些微妙的差异 - 让滑动行为更像变量滑动在更多或更少的任何其他语言。
例如,它转向封锁区块,它们在被宣布之前不存在,等等。
然而,值得注意的是,让它只是新的JavaScript实施的一部分,并且有不同的浏览器支持程度。
使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here
function loop(arr) {
// i IS known here, but undefined
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS known here, and has a value
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
};
// i IS known here, and has a value
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
// l IS NOT known here
}
loop([1,2,3,4]);
for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
};
for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS known here, and has a value
};
loop([1,2,3,4]);
// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here
今天使用安全吗?
有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。
事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:
此分類上一篇
如何跟踪浏览器支持
const name = 'Max'; let age = 33; var hasHobbies = true; name = 'Maximilian'; age = 34; hasHobbies = false; const summarizeUser = (userName, userAge, userHasHobby) => { return ( 'Name is'+ userName + ', age is'+ userAge +'and the user has hobbies:'+ userHasHobby ); } console.log(summarizeUser(name, age, hasHobbies));
正如你可以从上面的代码运行中看到的那样,当你尝试更改 const 变量时,你会发现一个错误:
试图超越一个“名称”,这是一个恒定的。
或
TypeError: Invalid assignment to const 'name'.
但是,看看放变量。
首先,我们宣布让年龄=33岁,然后将另一个值年龄=34岁,这是OK;当我们试图改变时,我们没有任何错误。