在 MDN 中查看此链接

let x = 1;

if (x === 1) {
let x = 2;

console.log(x);
// expected output: 2
}

console.log(x);
// expected output: 1

下面是让关键词的解释,有几个例子。

主要区别在于,一个变量的范围是整个关闭功能。

此图在维基百科上显示哪些浏览器支持JavaScript 1.7.

请注意,只有 Mozilla 和 Chrome 浏览器支持它. IE、Safari 和其他可能不支持它。

const name = 'Max'; let age = 33; var hasHobbies = true; name = 'Maximilian'; age = 34; hasHobbies = false; const summarizeUser = (userName, userAge, userHasHobby) => { return ( 'Name is'+ userName + ', age is'+ userAge +'and the user has hobbies:'+ userHasHobby ); } console.log(summarizeUser(name, age, hasHobbies));

正如你可以从上面的代码运行中看到的那样,当你尝试更改 const 变量时,你会发现一个错误:

试图超越一个“名称”,这是一个恒定的。

或

TypeError: Invalid assignment to const 'name'.

但是,看看放变量。

首先,我们宣布让年龄=33岁,然后将另一个值年龄=34岁,这是OK;当我们试图改变时,我们没有任何错误。

差异在于与每一个声明的变量范围。

让变量仅在其最接近的封锁区({... })中可见。让变量仅在变量被宣布后发生的代码线上可用。让变量不被随后的变量或变量重新宣布。让变量不被全球变量添加到全球窗口对象中。让变量易于使用与封锁(它们不会导致赛车条件)。

{
    let x = 1;
}
console.log(`x is ${x}`);  // ReferenceError during parsing: "x is not defined".

{
    x = x + 1;  // ReferenceError during parsing: "x is not defined".
    let x;
    console.log(`x is ${x}`);  // Never runs.
}

没有重新宣言:下列代码表明,被允许宣言的变量不能随后重新宣言:

let x = 1;
let x = 2;  // SyntaxError: Identifier 'x' has already been declared

var button = "I cause accidents because my name is too common.";
let link = "Though my name is common, I am harder to access from other JS files.";
console.log(link);  // OK
console.log(window.link);  // undefined (GOOD!)
console.log(window.button);  // OK

5. 易于使用与关闭: 与 var 表示的变量与关闭内部的关闭工作不太好. 这里是一个简单的旋转,结果的值序列,变量 i 有在不同的时间点:

for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

具体而言,这些输出:

i is 0
i is 1
i is 2
i is 3
i is 4

在JavaScript中,我们经常使用变量比它们创建时更晚的时间。当我们通过延迟输出以关闭转移到设置Timeout时:

for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    setTimeout(_ => console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
    setTimeout(_ => console.log(`i is ${i}`), 125/*ms*/);
}

i is 5
i is 5
i is 5
i is 5
i is 5

有一些微妙的差异 - 让滑动行为更像变量滑动在更多或更少的任何其他语言。

例如,它转向封锁区块,它们在被宣布之前不存在,等等。

然而,值得注意的是,让它只是新的JavaScript实施的一部分,并且有不同的浏览器支持程度。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持