有一些微妙的差异 - 让滑动行为更像变量滑动在更多或更少的任何其他语言。

例如,它转向封锁区块,它们在被宣布之前不存在,等等。

然而,值得注意的是,让它只是新的JavaScript实施的一部分,并且有不同的浏览器支持程度。

答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答答

var 变量是全球性的,基本上可以到达到任何地方,而让变量不是全球性的,只有直到一个关闭的偏见杀死它们。

请参见下面的我的例子,并注意狮子(Let)变量如何在两个 console.logs 中以不同的方式行事;它在第二个 console.log 中变得无效。

var cat = "cat";
let dog = "dog";

var animals = () => {
    var giraffe = "giraffe";
    let lion = "lion";

    console.log(cat);  //will print 'cat'.
    console.log(dog);  //will print 'dog', because dog was declared outside this function (like var cat).

    console.log(giraffe); //will print 'giraffe'.
    console.log(lion); //will print 'lion', as lion is within scope.
}

console.log(giraffe); //will print 'giraffe', as giraffe is a global variable (var).
console.log(lion); //will print UNDEFINED, as lion is a 'let' variable and is now out of scope.

让它很有趣,因为它允许我们做这样的事情:

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (let i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

其次,有数以数以数。

在哪里

(() => {
    var count = 0;

    for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
        for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
            for (var i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
                console.log(count++);
            }
        }
    }
})();

只有数数(0,1 )。

使用 var 声明定义的变量在其定义的整个函数中已知,从函数的开始。 (*) 使用 let 声明定义的变量仅在其定义的区块中已知,从其定义的时刻开始。

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, but undefined
// l IS NOT known here

function loop(arr) {
    // i IS known here, but undefined
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS NOT known here
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here

    for( let j = 0; j < arr.length; j++ ) {
        // i IS known here, and has a value
        // j IS known here, and has a value
        // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
        // l IS NOT known here
    };

    // i IS known here, and has a value
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, but has a value only the second time loop is called
    // l IS NOT known here
}

loop([1,2,3,4]);

for( var k = 0; k < arr.length; k++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS NOT known here
};

for( let l = 0; l < arr.length; l++ ) {
    // i IS NOT known here
    // j IS NOT known here
    // k IS known here, and has a value
    // l IS known here, and has a value
};

loop([1,2,3,4]);

// i IS NOT known here
// j IS NOT known here
// k IS known here, and has a value
// l IS NOT known here

今天使用安全吗?

有些人会说,在未来,我们只会使用让陈述,而这些陈述会变得过时。JavaScript老师Kyle Simpson写了一篇非常复杂的文章,他认为为什么不会这样。

事实上,我们实际上需要问自己是否安全使用放弃声明,这个问题的答案取决于你的环境:

此分類上一篇

如何跟踪浏览器支持

var 是全球范围(可容量)的变量。

Let and const 是区块范围。

测试JS

{ let l = 'let'; const c = 'const'; var v = 'var'; v2 = 'var 2'; } console.log(v, this.v); console.log(v2, this.v2); console.log(l); // ReferenceError: l 未定义 console.log(c); // ReferenceError: c 未定义

在基本上,

for (let i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
  // i accessible ✔️
}
// i not accessible ❌

for (var i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
  // i accessible ✔️
}
// i accessible ✔️

<unk>️ Sandbox 要玩 ↓

此分類上一篇