我想将两个词典融入一个新的词典。
x = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
y = {'b': 3, 'c': 4}
z = merge(x, y)
>>> z
{'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'c': 4}
每当两个字典中都有一个关键 k 时,只应保留 y(k) 的值。
我想将两个词典融入一个新的词典。
x = {'a': 1, 'b': 2}
y = {'b': 3, 'c': 4}
z = merge(x, y)
>>> z
{'a': 1, 'b': 3, 'c': 4}
每当两个字典中都有一个关键 k 时,只应保留 y(k) 的值。
当前回答
您可以使用 toolz.merge([x, y]) 为此。
其他回答
一个方法是深合的. 使用操作员在 3.9+ 用于使用案例的 dict 新是默认设置的组合,而 dict 现有是使用的现有设置的组合. 我的目标是融入任何添加设置从新没有过写现有设置在现有. 我相信这个重复的实施将允许一个升级一个 dict 与新的值从另一个 dict。
def merge_dict_recursive(new: dict, existing: dict):
merged = new | existing
for k, v in merged.items():
if isinstance(v, dict):
if k not in existing:
# The key is not in existing dict at all, so add entire value
existing[k] = new[k]
merged[k] = merge_dict_recursive(new[k], existing[k])
return merged
示例测试数据:
new
{'dashboard': True,
'depth': {'a': 1, 'b': 22222, 'c': {'d': {'e': 69}}},
'intro': 'this is the dashboard',
'newkey': False,
'show_closed_sessions': False,
'version': None,
'visible_sessions_limit': 9999}
existing
{'dashboard': True,
'depth': {'a': 5},
'intro': 'this is the dashboard',
'newkey': True,
'show_closed_sessions': False,
'version': '2021-08-22 12:00:30.531038+00:00'}
merged
{'dashboard': True,
'depth': {'a': 5, 'b': 22222, 'c': {'d': {'e': 69}}},
'intro': 'this is the dashboard',
'newkey': True,
'show_closed_sessions': False,
'version': '2021-08-22 12:00:30.531038+00:00',
'visible_sessions_limit': 9999}
Python 3.5 (PEP 448) 允许更好的合成选项:
x = {'a': 1, 'b': 1}
y = {'a': 2, 'c': 2}
final = {**x, **y}
final
# {'a': 2, 'b': 1, 'c': 2}
或甚至
final = {'a': 1, 'b': 1, **x, **y}
在 Python 3.9 中,您也可以使用 <unk>和 <unk>= 与 PEP 584 的下面的示例
d = {'spam': 1, 'eggs': 2, 'cheese': 3}
e = {'cheese': 'cheddar', 'aardvark': 'Ethel'}
d | e
# {'spam': 1, 'eggs': 2, 'cheese': 'cheddar', 'aardvark': 'Ethel'}
2 词典
def union2(dict1, dict2):
return dict(list(dict1.items()) + list(dict2.items()))
n 字典
def union(*dicts):
return dict(itertools.chain.from_iterable(dct.items() for dct in dicts))
查看 https://mathieularose.com/how-not-to-flatten-a-list-of-lists-in-python/
我想要一些类似的东西,但有能力说明双键中的值是如何合并的,所以我打破了这个(但没有重量测试)。
def merge(d1, d2, merge_fn=lambda x,y:y):
"""
Merges two dictionaries, non-destructively, combining
values on duplicate keys as defined by the optional merge
function. The default behavior replaces the values in d1
with corresponding values in d2. (There is no other generally
applicable merge strategy, but often you'll have homogeneous
types in your dicts, so specifying a merge technique can be
valuable.)
Examples:
>>> d1
{'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 2}
>>> merge(d1, d1)
{'a': 1, 'c': 3, 'b': 2}
>>> merge(d1, d1, lambda x,y: x+y)
{'a': 2, 'c': 6, 'b': 4}
"""
result = dict(d1)
for k,v in d2.iteritems():
if k in result:
result[k] = merge_fn(result[k], v)
else:
result[k] = v
return result
z = MergeDict(x, y)
当使用这个新对象时,它将像合并词典一样行事,但它将有持续的创作时间和持续的记忆脚印,同时让原始词典无触摸。
当然,如果你使用结果很多,那么你会在某个时候达到创建一个真正的合并词典会是最快的解决方案的界限。
a = { 'x': 3, 'y': 4 }
b = MergeDict(a) # we merge just one dict
b['x'] = 5
print b # will print {'x': 5, 'y': 4}
print a # will print {'y': 4, 'x': 3}
class MergeDict(object):
def __init__(self, *originals):
self.originals = ({},) + originals[::-1] # reversed
def __getitem__(self, key):
for original in self.originals:
try:
return original[key]
except KeyError:
pass
raise KeyError(key)
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
self.originals[0][key] = value
def __iter__(self):
return iter(self.keys())
def __repr__(self):
return '%s(%s)' % (
self.__class__.__name__,
', '.join(repr(original)
for original in reversed(self.originals)))
def __str__(self):
return '{%s}' % ', '.join(
'%r: %r' % i for i in self.iteritems())
def iteritems(self):
found = set()
for original in self.originals:
for k, v in original.iteritems():
if k not in found:
yield k, v
found.add(k)
def items(self):
return list(self.iteritems())
def keys(self):
return list(k for k, _ in self.iteritems())
def values(self):
return list(v for _, v in self.iteritems())