应用程序开发人员常见的数据库开发错误有哪些?
当前回答
不了解DBMS的工作原理。
如果不了解离合器的工作原理,你就不能正确地驾驶变速杆。如果不了解实际上只是在硬盘上写入文件,就无法理解如何使用数据库。
具体地说:
Do you know what a Clustered Index is? Did you think about it when you designed your schema? Do you know how to use indexes properly? How to reuse an index? Do you know what a Covering Index is? So great, you have indexes. How big is 1 row in your index? How big will the index be when you have a lot of data? Will that fit easily into memory? If it won't it's useless as an index. Have you ever used EXPLAIN in MySQL? Great. Now be honest with yourself: Did you understand even half of what you saw? No, you probably didn't. Fix that. Do you understand the Query Cache? Do you know what makes a query un-cachable? Are you using MyISAM? If you NEED full text search, MyISAM's is crap anyway. Use Sphinx. Then switch to Inno.
其他回答
开发人员所犯的关键数据库设计和编程错误
Selfish database design and usage. Developers often treat the database as their personal persistent object store without considering the needs of other stakeholders in the data. This also applies to application architects. Poor database design and data integrity makes it hard for third parties working with the data and can substantially increase the system's life cycle costs. Reporting and MIS tends to be a poor cousin in application design and only done as an afterthought. Abusing denormalised data. Overdoing denormalised data and trying to maintain it within the application is a recipe for data integrity issues. Use denormalisation sparingly. Not wanting to add a join to a query is not an excuse for denormalising. Scared of writing SQL. SQL isn't rocket science and is actually quite good at doing its job. O/R mapping layers are quite good at doing the 95% of queries that are simple and fit well into that model. Sometimes SQL is the best way to do the job. Dogmatic 'No Stored Procedures' policies. Regardless of whether you believe stored procedures are evil, this sort of dogmatic attitude has no place on a software project. Not understanding database design. Normalisation is your friend and it's not rocket science. Joining and cardinality are fairly simple concepts - if you're involved in database application development there's really no excuse for not understanding them.
1 -在where子句中的值上不必要地使用函数,导致该索引未被使用。
例子:
where to_char(someDate,'YYYYMMDD') between :fromDate and :toDate
而不是
where someDate >= to_date(:fromDate,'YYYYMMDD') and someDate < to_date(:toDate,'YYYYMMDD')+1
在较小的程度上:不向需要函数索引的值添加函数索引……
2 -没有添加检查约束以确保数据的有效性。查询优化器可以使用约束,它们确实有助于确保您可以信任您的不变量。没有理由不使用它们。
3 -纯粹出于懒惰或时间压力而向表中添加未规范化的列。事情通常不是这样设计的,而是演变成这样的。最终的结果是,当您在未来的演进中受到丢失的数据完整性的困扰时,将会有大量的工作试图清理混乱。
想想看,重新设计一个没有数据的表是非常便宜的。一个有数百万条记录的表,没有完整性……重新设计并不便宜。因此,在创建列或表时执行正确的设计是可以分摊的。
4 -不是关于数据库本身,但确实令人讨厌。不关心SQL的代码质量。SQL是用文本表示的事实并不意味着可以将逻辑隐藏在大量的字符串操作算法中。完全有可能用文本编写SQL,使您的程序员同事能够读懂。
将数据库仅仅视为一种存储机制(即美化的集合库),因此从属于它们的应用程序(忽略其他共享数据的应用程序)
使用Excel存储(大量)数据。
我曾见过一些公司拥有数千行并使用多个工作表(由于以前版本的Excel的行数限制为65535)。
Excel非常适合用于报告、数据演示和其他任务,但不应被视为数据库。
如果您正在使用复制(MySQL),以下函数是不安全的,除非您正在使用基于行的复制。
USER(), CURRENT_USER() (or CURRENT_USER), UUID(), VERSION(), LOAD_FILE(), and RAND()
参见:http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/replication-features-functions.html