在HTML中,表格不应该用于布局,这似乎是普遍的观点。

Why?

我从来没有(老实说,很少)看到过支持这一点的有力论据。通常的答案是:

It's good to separate content from layoutBut this is a fallacious argument; Cliche Thinking. I guess it's true that using the table element for layout has little to do with tabular data. So what? Does my boss care? Do my users care?Perhaps me or my fellow developers who have to maintain a web page care... Is a table less maintainable? I think using a table is easier than using divs and CSS.By the way... why is using a div or a span good separation of content from layout and a table not? Getting a good layout with only divs often requires a lot of nested divs. Readability of the codeI think it's the other way around. Most people understand HTML, few understand CSS. It's better for SEO not to use tablesWhy? Can anybody show some evidence that it is? Or a statement from Google that tables are discouraged from an SEO perspective? Tables are slower.An extra tbody element has to be inserted. This is peanuts for modern web browsers. Show me some benchmarks where the use of a table significantly slows down a page. A layout overhaul is easier without tables, see css Zen Garden.Most web sites that need an upgrade need new content (HTML) as well. Scenarios where a new version of a web site only needs a new CSS file are not very likely. Zen Garden is a nice web site, but a bit theoretical. Not to mention its misuse of CSS.

我对使用divs + CSS而不是表的良好参数非常感兴趣。


当前回答

根据过去的经验,我必须选择DIV。即使在OOP中,主要目的也是减少对象之间的耦合,因此这个概念可以应用于DIVS和表。表用于保存数据,而不是围绕页面排列数据。DIV是专门设计用于在页面周围排列项目的,因此设计应该使用DIV,表应该用于存储数据。

此外,编辑由表格组成的网站是非常困难的(在我看来)

其他回答

This isn't really about whether 'divs are better than tables for layout'. Someone who understands CSS can duplicate any design using 'layout tables' pretty straightforwardly. The real win is using HTML elements for what they are there for. The reason you would not use tables for non-tablular data is the same reason you don't store integers as character strings - technology works much more easily when you use it for the purpose for which it is desgined. If it was ever necessary to use tables for layout (because of browser shortcomings in the early 1990s) it certainly isn't now.

使用DIV,您可以轻松地进行切换。例如,你可以这样做:

Menu | Content

Content | Menu

Menu
----
Content

在CSS中更改它很容易,而在HTML中则不然。你也可以提供几种风格(右手,左手,专为小屏幕)。

在CSS中,您还可以将菜单隐藏在用于打印的特殊样式表中。

另一个好处是,你的内容在代码中总是按照相同的顺序(菜单在前,内容在后),即使在视觉上它是以其他方式呈现的。

I still don't quite understand how divs / CSS make it easier to change a page design when you consider the amount of testing to ensure the changes work on all browsers, especially with all the hacks and so on. Its a hugely frustrating and tedious process which wastes large amounts of time and money. Thankfully the 508 legislation only applies to the USA (land of the free - yeah right) and so being as I am based in the UK, I can develop web sites in whatever style I choose. Contrary to popular (US) belief, legislation made in Washington doesn't apply to the rest of the world - thank goodness for that. It must have been a good day in the world of web design the day the legislation came into force. I think I'm becoming increasingly cynical as I get older with 25 years in the IT industry but I feel sure this kind of legislation is just to protect jobs. In reality anyone can knock together a reasonable web page with a couple of tables. It takes a lot more effort and knowledge to do this with DIVs / CSS. In my experience it can take hours and hours Googling to find solutions to quite simple problems and reading incomprehensible articles in forums full of idealistic zealots all argueing about the 'right' way to do things. You can't just dip your toe in the water and get things to work properly in every case. It also seems to me that the lack of a definitive guide to using DIVS / CSS "out of the box", that applies to all situations, working on browsers, and written using 'normal' language with no geek speak, also smells of a bit of protectionism. I'm an application developer and I would say it takes almost twice as long to figure out layout problems and test against all browsers than it does to create the basic application, design and implement business objects, and create the database back end. My time = money, both for me and my customers alike so I am sorry if I don't reject all the pro DIV / CSS arguments in favour of cutting costs and providing value for money for my customers. Maybe its just the way that developers minds work, but it seems to me far easier to change a complex table structure than it is to modify DIVs / CSS. Thankfully it now appears that a solution to these issues is now available - its called WPF.

根据过去的经验,我必须选择DIV。即使在OOP中,主要目的也是减少对象之间的耦合,因此这个概念可以应用于DIVS和表。表用于保存数据,而不是围绕页面排列数据。DIV是专门设计用于在页面周围排列项目的,因此设计应该使用DIV,表应该用于存储数据。

此外,编辑由表格组成的网站是非常困难的(在我看来)

将内容与布局分开是很好的 但这是一个错误的论点;陈词滥调的思考

这是一个错误的论点,因为HTML表格是布局!内容是表中的数据,表示是表本身。这就是为什么从HTML中分离CSS有时会非常困难。您不是将内容与表示分开,而是将表示与表示分开!一堆嵌套的div和一个表没有什么不同——它只是一组不同的标签。

把HTML和CSS分开的另一个问题是,它们需要彼此的密切了解——你真的不能把它们完全分开。无论您做什么,HTML中的标记布局都与CSS文件紧密耦合。

我认为表与div的区别取决于应用程序的需要。

在我们在工作中开发的应用程序中,我们需要一个页面布局,其中各个块将动态地调整自己的大小以适应其内容。我花了几天时间试图让它与CSS和div跨浏览器工作,这是一个完全的噩梦。我们换了桌子,一切都很顺利。

然而,我们的产品有一个非常封闭的受众(我们销售的是带有web界面的硬件),可访问性问题不是我们关心的问题。我不知道为什么屏幕阅读器不能很好地处理表格,但我猜如果这是开发人员必须处理的方式。