这是另一种方法。现在，除了最后一个事件以外，所有事件都被抑制，而不是传播一系列事件中的第一个事件并抑制所有接下来的事件。我认为可以从这种方法中受益的场景更常见。

要做到这一点，我们必须使用滑动延迟。每个传入事件都会取消触发前一个事件的计时器，并重新启动计时器。这开启了一种可能性，即一系列永无止境的事件将永远推迟传播。为了简单起见，在下面的扩展方法中没有针对这种异常情况的规定。

public static class FileSystemWatcherExtensions
{
    public static IDisposable OnAnyEvent(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        WatcherChangeTypes changeTypes, FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
    {
        var cancellations = new Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource>(
            StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
        var locker = new object();
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Created))
            source.Created += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted))
            source.Deleted += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Changed))
            source.Changed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed))
            source.Renamed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        return new Disposable(() =>
        {
            source.Created -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Deleted -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Changed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Renamed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        });

        async void FileSystemWatcher_Event(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            var key = e.FullPath;
            var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing))
                {
                    existing.Cancel();
                }
                cancellations[key] = cts;
            }
            try
            {
                await Task.Delay(delay, cts.Token);
                // Omitting ConfigureAwait(false) is intentional here.
                // Continuing in the captured context is desirable.
            }
            catch (TaskCanceledException)
            {
                return;
            }
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing)
                    && existing == cts)
                {
                    cancellations.Remove(key);
                }
            }
            cts.Dispose();
            handler(sender, e);
        }
    }

    public static IDisposable OnAllEvents(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.All, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnCreated(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Created, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnDeleted(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnChanged(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Changed, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnRenamed(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed, handler, delay);

    private struct Disposable : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Action _action;
        internal Disposable(Action action) => _action = action;
        public void Dispose() => _action?.Invoke();
    }
}

使用的例子:

myWatcher.OnAnyEvent(WatcherChangeTypes.Created | WatcherChangeTypes.Changed,
    MyFileSystemWatcher_Event, 100);

这一行将两个事件(Created和Changed)的订阅组合在一起。所以它大致相当于这些:

myWatcher.Created += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;
myWatcher.Changed += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;

不同之处在于，这两个事件被视为单一类型的事件，在这些事件快速连续的情况下，只有最后一个事件将被传播。例如，如果一个Created事件后面跟着两个Changed事件，并且这三个事件之间的时间间隔不超过100 msec，则只有第二个Changed事件将通过调用MyFileSystemWatcher_Event处理程序来传播，而前一个事件将被丢弃。

如果你注册了OnChanged事件，那么在修改之前删除被监视的文件可能会起作用，只要你只需要监视OnChange事件。

主要是为了未来的我:)

我用Rx写了一个包装器:

 public class WatcherWrapper : IDisposable
{
    private readonly FileSystemWatcher _fileWatcher;
    private readonly Subject<FileSystemEventArgs> _infoSubject;
    private Subject<FileSystemEventArgs> _eventSubject;

    public WatcherWrapper(string path, string nameFilter = "*.*", NotifyFilters? notifyFilters = null)
    {
        _fileWatcher = new FileSystemWatcher(path, nameFilter);

        if (notifyFilters != null)
        {
            _fileWatcher.NotifyFilter = notifyFilters.Value;
        }

        _infoSubject = new Subject<FileSystemEventArgs>();
        _eventSubject = new Subject<FileSystemEventArgs>();

        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Changed").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Created").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Deleted").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);
        Observable.FromEventPattern<FileSystemEventArgs>(_fileWatcher, "Renamed").Select(e => e.EventArgs)
            .Subscribe(_infoSubject.OnNext);

        // this takes care of double events and still works with changing the name of the same file after a while
        _infoSubject.Buffer(TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(20))
            .Select(x => x.GroupBy(z => z.FullPath).Select(z => z.LastOrDefault()).Subscribe(
                infos =>
                {
                    if (infos != null)
                        foreach (var info in infos)
                        {
                            {
                                _eventSubject.OnNext(info);
                            }
                        }
                });

        _fileWatcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
    }

    public IObservable<FileSystemEventArgs> FileEvents => _eventSubject;


    public void Dispose()
    {
        _fileWatcher?.Dispose();
        _eventSubject.Dispose();
        _infoSubject.Dispose();
    }
}

用法:

var watcher = new WatcherWrapper(_path, "*.info");
// all more complicated and scenario specific filtering of events can be done here    
watcher.FileEvents.Where(x => x.ChangeType != WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted).Subscribe(x => //do stuff)

您可以尝试打开它进行写入，如果成功，则可以假设其他应用程序已经处理了该文件。

private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    try
    {
        using (var fs = File.OpenWrite(e.FullPath))
        {
        }
        //do your stuff
    }
    catch (Exception)
    {
        //no write access, other app not done
    }
}

仅仅打开它以供写入似乎不会引发已更改的事件。所以应该是安全的。

我用了n种更简单的方法。

布尔-如果正在进行某项操作，则为true。当它结束时，false。 在处理之前，将其添加到HashSet。这样我就不会重复元素了。 每隔30分钟，计时器的事件就会运行一次，如果没有作业正在执行，它就会清除列表(just hashset = new hashset)。

FileReadTime = DateTime.Now;

private void File_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{            
    var lastWriteTime = File.GetLastWriteTime(e.FullPath);
    if (lastWriteTime.Subtract(FileReadTime).Ticks > 0)
    {
        // code
        FileReadTime = DateTime.Now;
    }
}