解决方案实际上取决于用例。您是否在注意不更改的新文件，或每隔一段时间更改一次的文件或经常更改的文件?在我的情况下，它的变化不太频繁，我不想错过任何这些变化。

但是我也不想在写入过程尚未完成写入的地方发生更改事件。

在我的情况下，我注意到6 (6 !!)onchange事件写一个125字符的txt文件。

我的解决方案是民意调查和改变事件的混合，民意调查经常被消极地看待。正常轮询比较慢，比如每10秒一次，以防FileSystemWatcher (FSW)“错过”一个事件。轮询立即响应FSW更改事件。

关键是在FSW。更改事件时，轮询速度加快，例如每100毫秒，并等待直到文件稳定。因此我们有了“两阶段轮询”:阶段1比较慢，但在FSW文件更改事件时立即响应。第二阶段是快速的，等待一个稳定的文件。

如果FSW检测到多个文件更改，每个事件都会加速轮询循环，并有效地启动一个新的短等待周期。只有在轮询循环检测到上次写入时文件没有进一步的变化之后，它才假定文件是稳定的，并且您的代码可以处理更改后的文件。

我选择了10秒和100毫秒的超时，但是您的用例可能需要不同的超时值。

这里是轮询，其中AppConfig。fiIO是要注意的FileInfo:

private readonly EventWaitHandle ewhTimeout = new AutoResetEvent(false);

private void TwoPhasedPolling()
{
    bool WaitForChange = true; //false: wait until stable
    DateTime LastWriteTime = DateTime.MinValue;
    while (true)
    {
        // wait for next poll (timeout), or FSW event
        bool GotOne = ewhTimeout.WaitOne(WaitForChange ? 10 * 1000 : 100);
        if (GotOne)
        {
            // WaitOne interrupted: end of Phase1: FSW detected file change
            WaitForChange = false;
        }
        else
        {
            // WaitOne timed out: Phase2: check file write time for change
            if (AppConfig.fiIO.LastWriteTime > LastWriteTime)
            {
                LastWriteTime = AppConfig.fiIO.LastWriteTime;
            }
            else
            {
                // End of Phase2: file has changed and is stable
                WaitForChange = true;
                // action on changed file
                ... your code here ...
            }}}}

private void fileSystemWatcher1_Changed(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
{
    ewhTimeout.Set();
}

NB:是的，我也不喜欢}}}}，但它使列表更短，这样你就不必滚动了:-)

试试这个，效果很好

  private static readonly FileSystemWatcher Watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        Console.WriteLine("Watching....");

        Watcher.Path = @"D:\Temp\Watcher";
        Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
        Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        Console.ReadKey();
    }

    static void OnChanged(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        try
        {
            Watcher.Changed -= OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = false;
            Console.WriteLine($"File Changed. Name: {e.Name}");
        }
        catch (Exception exception)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(exception);
        }
        finally
        {
            Watcher.Changed += OnChanged;
            Watcher.EnableRaisingEvents = true;
        }
    }

这个代码对我有用。

        private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {

        string fullFilePath = e.FullPath.ToString();
        string fullURL = buildTheUrlFromStudyXML(fullFilePath);

        System.Diagnostics.Process.Start("iexplore", fullURL);

        Timer timer = new Timer();
        ((FileSystemWatcher)source).Changed -= new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
        timer.Interval = 1000;
        timer.Elapsed += new ElapsedEventHandler(t_Elapsed);
        timer.Start();
    }

    private void t_Elapsed(object sender, ElapsedEventArgs e)
    {
        ((Timer)sender).Stop();
        theWatcher.Changed += new FileSystemEventHandler(OnChanged);
    }

我简单地添加了一个dupe检查如下:

 private void OnChanged(object source, FileSystemEventArgs e)
    {
        string sTabName = Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension(e.Name);
        string sLastLine = ReadLastLine(e.FullPath);
        if(sLastLine != _dupeCheck)
        {
            TabPage tp = tcLogs.TabPages[sTabName];
            TextBox tbLog = (TextBox)tp.Controls[0] as TextBox;

            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.AppendText(sLastLine + Environment.NewLine)));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.SelectionStart = tbLog.Text.Length));
            tbLog.Invoke(new Action(() => tbLog.ScrollToCaret()));
            _dupeCheck = sLastLine;
        }
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path)
    {
        return ReadLastLine(path, Encoding.Default, "\n");
    }

    public static String ReadLastLine(string path, Encoding encoding, string newline)
    {
        int charsize = encoding.GetByteCount("\n");
        byte[] buffer = encoding.GetBytes(newline);
        using (FileStream stream = new FileStream(path, FileMode.Open, FileAccess.Read, FileShare.ReadWrite))
        {
            long endpos = stream.Length / charsize;
            for (long pos = charsize; pos < endpos; pos += charsize)
            {
                stream.Seek(-pos, SeekOrigin.End);
                stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                if (encoding.GetString(buffer) == newline)
                {
                    buffer = new byte[stream.Length - stream.Position];
                    stream.Read(buffer, 0, buffer.Length);
                    return encoding.GetString(buffer);
                }
            }
        }
        return null;
    }

    [DllImport("user32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto)]
    private static extern int SendMessage(IntPtr hWnd, int wMsg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam);

    private const int WM_VSCROLL = 0x115;
    private const int SB_BOTTOM = 7;

    /// <summary>
    /// Scrolls the vertical scroll bar of a multi-line text box to the bottom.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="tb">The text box to scroll</param>
    public static void ScrollToBottom(TextBox tb)
    {
        SendMessage(tb.Handle, WM_VSCROLL, (IntPtr)SB_BOTTOM, IntPtr.Zero);
    }

好吧，这是我如何只引发一个事件的解决方案:

FileSystemWatcheк watcher = new FileSystemWatcher();

//'path' - path to the file that has been modified.
watcher.Changed += (s, e) => FileChanged(path);

这里是FileChanged实现

//count is our counter to triger when we can raise and when not.
private int count = 0;
private void FileChanged(string path)
{
   if (count % 2 == 0)
     {
       //code here
     }

     count ++;
}

这是另一种方法。现在，除了最后一个事件以外，所有事件都被抑制，而不是传播一系列事件中的第一个事件并抑制所有接下来的事件。我认为可以从这种方法中受益的场景更常见。

要做到这一点，我们必须使用滑动延迟。每个传入事件都会取消触发前一个事件的计时器，并重新启动计时器。这开启了一种可能性，即一系列永无止境的事件将永远推迟传播。为了简单起见，在下面的扩展方法中没有针对这种异常情况的规定。

public static class FileSystemWatcherExtensions
{
    public static IDisposable OnAnyEvent(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        WatcherChangeTypes changeTypes, FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
    {
        var cancellations = new Dictionary<string, CancellationTokenSource>(
            StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
        var locker = new object();
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Created))
            source.Created += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted))
            source.Deleted += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Changed))
            source.Changed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        if (changeTypes.HasFlag(WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed))
            source.Renamed += FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        return new Disposable(() =>
        {
            source.Created -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Deleted -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Changed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
            source.Renamed -= FileSystemWatcher_Event;
        });

        async void FileSystemWatcher_Event(object sender, FileSystemEventArgs e)
        {
            var key = e.FullPath;
            var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing))
                {
                    existing.Cancel();
                }
                cancellations[key] = cts;
            }
            try
            {
                await Task.Delay(delay, cts.Token);
                // Omitting ConfigureAwait(false) is intentional here.
                // Continuing in the captured context is desirable.
            }
            catch (TaskCanceledException)
            {
                return;
            }
            lock (locker)
            {
                if (cancellations.TryGetValue(key, out var existing)
                    && existing == cts)
                {
                    cancellations.Remove(key);
                }
            }
            cts.Dispose();
            handler(sender, e);
        }
    }

    public static IDisposable OnAllEvents(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.All, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnCreated(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Created, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnDeleted(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Deleted, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnChanged(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Changed, handler, delay);

    public static IDisposable OnRenamed(this FileSystemWatcher source,
        FileSystemEventHandler handler, int delay)
        => OnAnyEvent(source, WatcherChangeTypes.Renamed, handler, delay);

    private struct Disposable : IDisposable
    {
        private readonly Action _action;
        internal Disposable(Action action) => _action = action;
        public void Dispose() => _action?.Invoke();
    }
}

使用的例子:

myWatcher.OnAnyEvent(WatcherChangeTypes.Created | WatcherChangeTypes.Changed,
    MyFileSystemWatcher_Event, 100);

这一行将两个事件(Created和Changed)的订阅组合在一起。所以它大致相当于这些:

myWatcher.Created += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;
myWatcher.Changed += MyFileSystemWatcher_Event;

不同之处在于，这两个事件被视为单一类型的事件，在这些事件快速连续的情况下，只有最后一个事件将被传播。例如，如果一个Created事件后面跟着两个Changed事件，并且这三个事件之间的时间间隔不超过100 msec，则只有第二个Changed事件将通过调用MyFileSystemWatcher_Event处理程序来传播，而前一个事件将被丢弃。