我一直在使用ES6 Promise。
通常,Promise是这样构造和使用的
new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
if (someCondition){
resolve();
} else {
reject();
}
});
但我一直在做下面这样的事情,为了灵活起见,把决心放在外面。
var outsideResolve;
var outsideReject;
new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
outsideResolve = resolve;
outsideReject = reject;
});
后来
onClick = function(){
outsideResolve();
}
这很好,但是否有更简单的方法来做到这一点?如果不是,这是一个好的实践吗?
公认的答案是错误的。使用范围和引用非常简单,尽管这可能会让Promise纯粹主义者生气:
const createPromise = () => {
let resolver;
return [
new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolver = resolve;
}),
resolver,
];
};
const [ promise, resolver ] = createPromise();
promise.then(value => console.log(value));
setTimeout(() => resolver('foo'), 1000);
我们实际上是在创建promise时获取resolve函数的引用,并返回该引用,以便可以在外部设置它。
在一秒钟内控制台将输出:
> foo
helper方法可以减轻这种额外的开销,并给您同样的jQuery感觉。
function Deferred() {
let resolve;
let reject;
const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
resolve = res;
reject = rej;
});
return { promise, resolve, reject };
}
用法是
const { promise, resolve, reject } = Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: resolve,
cancel: reject
});
return promise;
它类似于jQuery
const dfd = $.Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: dfd.resolve,
cancel: dfd.reject
});
return dfd.promise();
不过,在用例中,这种简单的本机语法就可以了
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
displayConfirmationDialog({
confirm: resolve,
cancel: reject
});
});
我想分享一些不同的东西,这是这个话题的延伸。
有时,您希望“任务承诺”在解析时自动在相同的地址(属性或变量)重新创建。可以创建一个外部解析器来完成这个任务。
一个带有外部解析器的重复承诺的例子。无论何时调用解析器,都会在相同的地址/变量/属性处创建一个新的承诺。
let resolvePromise;
let thePromise;
const setPromise = (resolve) => {
resolvePromise = () => {
resolve();
thePromise = new Promise(setPromise);
}
}
thePromise = new Promise(setPromise);
(async () => {
let i = 0;
while (true) {
let msg = (i % 2 === 0) ? 'Tick' : 'Tock';
document.body.innerHTML = msg;
setTimeout(resolvePromise, 1000);
await thePromise;
i++;
}
})();
https://jsfiddle.net/h3zvw5xr
我正在使用一个辅助函数来创建我所谓的“扁平承诺”-
function flatPromise() {
let resolve, reject;
const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
resolve = res;
reject = rej;
});
return { promise, resolve, reject };
}
我是这样用的
function doSomethingAsync() {
// Get your promise and callbacks
const { resolve, reject, promise } = flatPromise();
// Do something amazing...
setTimeout(() => {
resolve('done!');
}, 500);
// Pass your promise to the world
return promise;
}
参见完整的工作示例-
function flatPromise() {
let resolve, reject;
const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
resolve = res;
reject = rej;
});
return { promise, resolve, reject };
}
function doSomethingAsync() {
// Get your promise and callbacks
const { resolve, reject, promise } = flatPromise();
// Do something amazing...
setTimeout(() => {
resolve('done!');
}, 500);
// Pass your promise to the world
return promise;
}
(async function run() {
const result = await doSomethingAsync()
.catch(err => console.error('rejected with', err));
console.log(result);
})();
编辑:
我已经创建了一个名为flat-promise的NPM包,代码也可以在GitHub上获得。
公认的答案是错误的。使用范围和引用非常简单,尽管这可能会让Promise纯粹主义者生气:
const createPromise = () => {
let resolver;
return [
new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
resolver = resolve;
}),
resolver,
];
};
const [ promise, resolver ] = createPromise();
promise.then(value => console.log(value));
setTimeout(() => resolver('foo'), 1000);
我们实际上是在创建promise时获取resolve函数的引用,并返回该引用,以便可以在外部设置它。
在一秒钟内控制台将输出:
> foo