只是另一种从外部解决承诺的方法

 class Lock {
        #lock;  // Promise to be resolved (on  release)
        release;  // Release lock
        id;  // Id of lock
        constructor(id) {
            this.id = id
            this.#lock = new Promise((resolve) => {
                this.release = () => {
                    if (resolve) {
                        resolve()
                    } else {
                        Promise.resolve()
                    }
                }
            })
        }
        get() { return this.#lock }
    }

使用

let lock = new Lock(... some id ...);
...
lock.get().then(()=>{console.log('resolved/released')})
lock.release()  // Excpected 'resolved/released'

我发现自己在某些情况下也忽略了Deferred模式。你总是可以在ES6的顶部创建一个:

export default class Deferred<T> {
    private _resolve: (value: T) => void = () => {};
    private _reject: (value: T) => void = () => {};

    private _promise: Promise<T> = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
        this._reject = reject;
        this._resolve = resolve;
    })

    public get promise(): Promise<T> {
        return this._promise;
    }

    public resolve(value: T) {
        this._resolve(value);
    }

    public reject(value: T) {
        this._reject(value);
    }
}

类版本，在Typescript中:

export class Deferred<T> {
    public readonly promise: Promise<T>
    private resolveFn!: (value: T | PromiseLike<T>) => void
    private rejectFn!: (reason?: any) => void

    public constructor() {
        this.promise = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
            this.resolveFn = resolve
            this.rejectFn = reject
        })
    }

    public reject(reason?: any): void {
        this.rejectFn(reason)
    }

    public resolve(param: T): void {
        this.resolveFn(param)
    }
}

helper方法可以减轻这种额外的开销，并给您同样的jQuery感觉。

function Deferred() {
    let resolve;
    let reject;
    const promise = new Promise((res, rej) => {
        resolve = res;
        reject = rej;
    });
    return { promise, resolve, reject };
}

用法是

const { promise, resolve, reject } = Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: resolve,
    cancel: reject
});
return promise;

它类似于jQuery

const dfd = $.Deferred();
displayConfirmationDialog({
    confirm: dfd.resolve,
    cancel: dfd.reject
});
return dfd.promise();

不过，在用例中，这种简单的本机语法就可以了

return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
    displayConfirmationDialog({
        confirm: resolve,
        cancel: reject
    });
});

公认的答案是错误的。使用范围和引用非常简单，尽管这可能会让Promise纯粹主义者生气:

const createPromise = () => {
    let resolver;
    return [
        new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
            resolver = resolve;
        }),
        resolver,
    ];
};

const [ promise, resolver ] = createPromise();
promise.then(value => console.log(value));
setTimeout(() => resolver('foo'), 1000);

我们实际上是在创建promise时获取resolve函数的引用，并返回该引用，以便可以在外部设置它。

在一秒钟内控制台将输出:

> foo

因为我没有找到我想要的东西，所以当我以这个问题结束时，我将分享我真正想要实现的东西。

场景:我有3个不同的API，具有相同的可能响应，因此我想在一个函数中处理承诺的完成和错误处理。这就是我所做的:

创建一个处理器函数:

  private handleHttpPromise = (promise: Promise<any>) => {
    promise
      .then((response: any) => {
        // do something with the response
        console.log(response);
      })
      .catch((error) => {
        // do something with the error
        console.log(error);
      });
  };

将承诺发送给创建的处理程序

  switch (method) {
    case 'get': {
      this.handleHttpPromise(apiService.get(url));
      break;
    }
    case 'post': {
      if (jsonData) {
        this.handleHttpPromise(apiService.post(url, jsonData));
      }
      break;
    }
    // (...)
  }