我一直在使用ES6 Promise。
通常，Promise是这样构造和使用的
new Promise(function(resolve, reject){
if (someCondition){
resolve();
} else {
reject();
}
});
但我一直在做下面这样的事情，为了灵活起见，把决心放在外面。
var outsideResolve;
var outsideReject;
new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
outsideResolve = resolve;
outsideReject = reject;
});
后来
onClick = function(){
outsideResolve();
}
这很好，但是否有更简单的方法来做到这一点?如果不是，这是一个好的实践吗?
当前回答
只是另一种从外部解决承诺的方法
class Lock {
#lock; // Promise to be resolved (on release)
release; // Release lock
id; // Id of lock
constructor(id) {
this.id = id
this.#lock = new Promise((resolve) => {
this.release = () => {
if (resolve) {
resolve()
} else {
Promise.resolve()
}
}
})
}
get() { return this.#lock }
}
使用
let lock = new Lock(... some id ...);
...
lock.get().then(()=>{console.log('resolved/released')})
lock.release() // Excpected 'resolved/released'
其他回答
我为此写了一个小库。https://www.npmjs.com/package/@inf3rno/promise.exposed
我使用了别人写的工厂方法，但是我也重写了then, catch, finally方法，所以你也可以通过这些方法解决原来的承诺。
在没有外部执行人的情况下解决承诺:
const promise = Promise.exposed().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");
从外部与执行器的setTimeout赛跑:
const promise = Promise.exposed(function (resolve, reject){
setTimeout(function (){
resolve("I almost fell asleep.")
}, 100000);
}).then(console.log);
setTimeout(function (){
promise.resolve("I don't want to wait that much.");
}, 100);
如果你不想污染全局命名空间，有一个无冲突模式:
const createExposedPromise = require("@inf3rno/promise.exposed/noConflict");
const promise = createExposedPromise().then(console.log);
promise.resolve("This should show up in the console.");
我们的解决方案是使用闭包来存储解析/拒绝函数，并附加一个函数来扩展承诺本身。
模式如下:
function getPromise() {
var _resolve, _reject;
var promise = new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
_reject = reject;
_resolve = resolve;
});
promise.resolve_ex = (value) => {
_resolve(value);
};
promise.reject_ex = (value) => {
_reject(value);
};
return promise;
}
使用它:
var promise = getPromise();
promise.then(value => {
console.info('The promise has been fulfilled: ' + value);
});
promise.resolve_ex('hello');
// or the reject version
//promise.reject_ex('goodbye');
类版本，在Typescript中:
export class Deferred<T> {
public readonly promise: Promise<T>
private resolveFn!: (value: T | PromiseLike<T>) => void
private rejectFn!: (reason?: any) => void
public constructor() {
this.promise = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
this.resolveFn = resolve
this.rejectFn = reject
})
}
public reject(reason?: any): void {
this.rejectFn(reason)
}
public resolve(param: T): void {
this.resolveFn(param)
}
}
我发现自己在某些情况下也忽略了Deferred模式。你总是可以在ES6的顶部创建一个:
export default class Deferred<T> {
private _resolve: (value: T) => void = () => {};
private _reject: (value: T) => void = () => {};
private _promise: Promise<T> = new Promise<T>((resolve, reject) => {
this._reject = reject;
this._resolve = resolve;
})
public get promise(): Promise<T> {
return this._promise;
}
public resolve(value: T) {
this._resolve(value);
}
public reject(value: T) {
this._reject(value);
}
}
我做了一个名为manual-promise的库，它的功能是替换Promise的drop。这里的其他答案都不能作为Promise的替代品，因为它们使用代理或包装器。
纱线添加手工承诺
NPN安装手动承诺
import { ManualPromise } from "manual-promise";
const prom = new ManualPromise();
prom.resolve(2);
// actions can still be run inside the promise
const prom2 = new ManualPromise((resolve, reject) => {
// ... code
});
new ManualPromise() instanceof Promise === true
https://github.com/zpxp/manual-promise#readme
